在早期精神分裂症治疗中采用循证抗精神病药物的多层次障碍和促进因素。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2024.1385398
Allison J Carroll, Delbert G Robinson, John M Kane, Avram Kordon, Jennifer Bannon, Theresa L Walunas, C Hendricks Brown
{"title":"在早期精神分裂症治疗中采用循证抗精神病药物的多层次障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Allison J Carroll, Delbert G Robinson, John M Kane, Avram Kordon, Jennifer Bannon, Theresa L Walunas, C Hendricks Brown","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2024.1385398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (<i>n</i> = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (<i>n</i> = 5), administrators (<i>n</i> = 3), clients (<i>n</i> = 3), and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a \"last resort\" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"4 ","pages":"1385398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based antipsychotics in the treatment of early-phase schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Allison J Carroll, Delbert G Robinson, John M Kane, Avram Kordon, Jennifer Bannon, Theresa L Walunas, C Hendricks Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2024.1385398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (<i>n</i> = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (<i>n</i> = 5), administrators (<i>n</i> = 3), clients (<i>n</i> = 3), and caregivers (<i>n</i> = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a \\\"last resort\\\" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"1385398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1385398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1385398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物和氯氮平是早期干预服务中有效但未得到充分利用的医疗疗法。本研究旨在对早期干预项目的背景决定因素进行实施前评估,以便在共同决策模式下实施优化 LAI 抗精神病药物和氯氮平使用的创新方法:半结构式访谈探讨了在早期干预服务中实施LAI抗精神病药物和氯氮平的障碍和促进因素。参与者包括:处方者(n = 2)、非处方临床医生(n = 5)、管理者(n = 3)、客户(n = 3)和照顾者(n = 3)。访谈采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR 2.0)进行组织和分析:结果:尽管存在障碍(如交通、保险范围),但参与者都支持使用 LAI 抗精神病药物,而大多数人对氯氮平(创新)并不熟悉。关键事件(如 COVID-19)并没有干扰实施,而障碍包括缺乏绩效衡量标准;影响服药意愿的耻辱感;以及氯氮平被视为 "最后手段"(外部环境)。治疗文化被描述为以客户为中心和协作式,大多数参与者表示LAI抗精神病药物的使用与诊所的工作流程相符,但有些人需要资源(例如,接受过LAI抗精神病药物管理培训的人;内部环境)。医疗团队的参与者表示对自己的角色充满信心。建议通过家庭教育和合作决策来提高客户/家庭的参与度(个人)。参与者认为,跟踪用药依从性、解决客户关切的问题以及为处方者提供最新的循证治疗指南(实施过程)非常重要:讨论:研究结果可为未来项目的实施策略选择提供指导,从而在适当的时候优化LAI抗精神病药物和氯氮平对早期精神分裂症的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based antipsychotics in the treatment of early-phase schizophrenia.

Introduction: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications and clozapine are effective yet underutilized medical therapies in early intervention services. The purpose of this study was to conduct a pre-implementation evaluation of contextual determinants of early intervention programs to implement innovations optimizing LAI antipsychotic and clozapine use within a shared decision-making model.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews explored barriers and facilitators to implementing LAI antipsychotics and clozapine in early intervention services. Participants were: prescribers (n = 2), non-prescribing clinicians (n = 5), administrators (n = 3), clients (n = 3), and caregivers (n = 3). Interviews were structured and analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0).

Results: Participants were supportive of using LAI antipsychotics, despite barriers (e.g., transportation, insurance coverage), while most were unfamiliar with clozapine (Innovation). Critical incidents (e.g., COVID-19) did not interfere with implementation, while barriers included lack of performance measures; stigma affecting willingness to take medication; and clozapine considered to be a "last resort" (Outer Setting). Treatment culture was described as client-centered and collaborative, and most participants indicated LAI antipsychotic use was compatible with clinic workflows, but some were in need of resources (e.g., individuals trained to administer LAI antipsychotics; Inner Setting). Participants on the healthcare team expressed confidence in their roles. Family education and collaborative decision-making were recommended to improve client/family engagement (Individuals). Participants related the importance of tracking medication compliance, addressing client concerns, and providing prescribers with updated guidelines on evidence-based treatment (Implementation Process).

Discussion: Results may guide implementation strategy selection for future programs seeking to optimize the use of LAI antipsychotics and clozapine for early-phase schizophrenia, when appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1