Iván Coarasa, Julio Amaré, Jaime Apilluelo, Susana Cebrián, David Cintas, Eduardo García, María Martínez, Miguel Ángel Oliván, Ysrael Ortigoza, Alfonso Ortiz de Solórzano, Tamara Pardo, Jorge Puimedón, Ana Salinas, María Luisa Sarsa, Patricia Villar
{"title":"ANAIS-112三年数据:对DAMA/LIBRA暗物质信号进行与模型无关的灵敏负测试","authors":"Iván Coarasa, Julio Amaré, Jaime Apilluelo, Susana Cebrián, David Cintas, Eduardo García, María Martínez, Miguel Ángel Oliván, Ysrael Ortigoza, Alfonso Ortiz de Solórzano, Tamara Pardo, Jorge Puimedón, Ana Salinas, María Luisa Sarsa, Patricia Villar","doi":"10.1038/s42005-024-01827-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) are well-motivated candidates for dark matter. One signature of galactic WIMPs is the annual modulation expected in a detector’s interaction rate, which arises from Earth’s revolution around the Sun. Over two decades, the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed such modulation with 250 kg of NaI(Tl) scintillators, in accordance with WIMP expectations but inconsistent with the negative results of other experiments. The signal depends on the target material, so to validate or refute the DAMA result, the experiment must be replicated using the same material. This is the goal of the ANAIS–112 experiment, currently underway since August 2017 with 112.5 kg of NaI(Tl). In this work, we present a reanalysis of three years of data employing an improved analysis chain to enhance the experimental sensitivity. The results presented here are consistent with the absence of modulation and inconsistent with DAMA’s observation at nearly 3σ confidence level, with the potential to reach a 5σ level within 8 years from the beginning of the data collection. Additionally, we explore the impact of different scintillation quenching factors in the comparison between ANAIS–112 and DAMA/LIBRA. The DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed a clear signal of dark matter for over 20 years. Although this signal contradicts the negative results of other experiments, it cannot be dismissed without replication using the same material. The authors present the negative results from the ANAIS-112 experiment, which uses the same target and shows strong tension with DAMA/LIBRA","PeriodicalId":10540,"journal":{"name":"Communications Physics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-024-01827-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANAIS–112 three years data: a sensitive model independent negative test of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter signal\",\"authors\":\"Iván Coarasa, Julio Amaré, Jaime Apilluelo, Susana Cebrián, David Cintas, Eduardo García, María Martínez, Miguel Ángel Oliván, Ysrael Ortigoza, Alfonso Ortiz de Solórzano, Tamara Pardo, Jorge Puimedón, Ana Salinas, María Luisa Sarsa, Patricia Villar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s42005-024-01827-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) are well-motivated candidates for dark matter. One signature of galactic WIMPs is the annual modulation expected in a detector’s interaction rate, which arises from Earth’s revolution around the Sun. Over two decades, the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed such modulation with 250 kg of NaI(Tl) scintillators, in accordance with WIMP expectations but inconsistent with the negative results of other experiments. The signal depends on the target material, so to validate or refute the DAMA result, the experiment must be replicated using the same material. This is the goal of the ANAIS–112 experiment, currently underway since August 2017 with 112.5 kg of NaI(Tl). In this work, we present a reanalysis of three years of data employing an improved analysis chain to enhance the experimental sensitivity. The results presented here are consistent with the absence of modulation and inconsistent with DAMA’s observation at nearly 3σ confidence level, with the potential to reach a 5σ level within 8 years from the beginning of the data collection. Additionally, we explore the impact of different scintillation quenching factors in the comparison between ANAIS–112 and DAMA/LIBRA. The DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed a clear signal of dark matter for over 20 years. Although this signal contradicts the negative results of other experiments, it cannot be dismissed without replication using the same material. The authors present the negative results from the ANAIS-112 experiment, which uses the same target and shows strong tension with DAMA/LIBRA\",\"PeriodicalId\":10540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-024-01827-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-024-01827-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42005-024-01827-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ANAIS–112 three years data: a sensitive model independent negative test of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter signal
Weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) are well-motivated candidates for dark matter. One signature of galactic WIMPs is the annual modulation expected in a detector’s interaction rate, which arises from Earth’s revolution around the Sun. Over two decades, the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed such modulation with 250 kg of NaI(Tl) scintillators, in accordance with WIMP expectations but inconsistent with the negative results of other experiments. The signal depends on the target material, so to validate or refute the DAMA result, the experiment must be replicated using the same material. This is the goal of the ANAIS–112 experiment, currently underway since August 2017 with 112.5 kg of NaI(Tl). In this work, we present a reanalysis of three years of data employing an improved analysis chain to enhance the experimental sensitivity. The results presented here are consistent with the absence of modulation and inconsistent with DAMA’s observation at nearly 3σ confidence level, with the potential to reach a 5σ level within 8 years from the beginning of the data collection. Additionally, we explore the impact of different scintillation quenching factors in the comparison between ANAIS–112 and DAMA/LIBRA. The DAMA/LIBRA experiment has observed a clear signal of dark matter for over 20 years. Although this signal contradicts the negative results of other experiments, it cannot be dismissed without replication using the same material. The authors present the negative results from the ANAIS-112 experiment, which uses the same target and shows strong tension with DAMA/LIBRA
期刊介绍:
Communications Physics is an open access journal from Nature Research publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the physical sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances bringing new insight to a specialized area of research in physics. We also aim to provide a community forum for issues of importance to all physicists, regardless of sub-discipline.
The scope of the journal covers all areas of experimental, applied, fundamental, and interdisciplinary physical sciences. Primary research published in Communications Physics includes novel experimental results, new techniques or computational methods that may influence the work of others in the sub-discipline. We also consider submissions from adjacent research fields where the central advance of the study is of interest to physicists, for example material sciences, physical chemistry and technologies.