{"title":"揭示种族化地域:投资者策略与 2008 年芝加哥金融危机的影响","authors":"Amanda Kass , Carrie Craig","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The wreckage of the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) led to long lasting changes in the single-family rental market. A variety of investors took advantage of the post-GFC environment, specializing in different segments of the distressed housing market. We examine two prominent companies’ activity in Chicagoland to explore how post-GFC investor purchases map onto a racialized geography that itself is a product of past housing policies and practices. National companies engaged in land contract sales and single-family rentals (SFR) targeted different sections of the foreclosure crisis that occurred during the broader GFC. While the SFR profit-strategy necessitates buying habitable properties that can attract tenants, predatory land contract sellers milk profit from distressed housing by offloading the risk (and cost) of homeownership to buyers. By exploring the geography of where the corporate landlord American Homes 4 Rent and land contract seller Harbour Portfolio purchased in the GFC’s aftermath we can better understand how the racialized nature of the U.S. housing market creates different pathways for profit <em>and</em> deepens racial-income inequities. American Homes 4 Rent targeted properties in higher income, whiter exurban regions of Chicagoland whereas Harbour Portfolio concentrated its activity in lower-income, majority-minority communities largely within the City of Chicago.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering racialized geographies: Investor strategies and the legacy of the 2008 financial crisis in Chicagoland\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Kass , Carrie Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The wreckage of the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) led to long lasting changes in the single-family rental market. A variety of investors took advantage of the post-GFC environment, specializing in different segments of the distressed housing market. We examine two prominent companies’ activity in Chicagoland to explore how post-GFC investor purchases map onto a racialized geography that itself is a product of past housing policies and practices. National companies engaged in land contract sales and single-family rentals (SFR) targeted different sections of the foreclosure crisis that occurred during the broader GFC. While the SFR profit-strategy necessitates buying habitable properties that can attract tenants, predatory land contract sellers milk profit from distressed housing by offloading the risk (and cost) of homeownership to buyers. By exploring the geography of where the corporate landlord American Homes 4 Rent and land contract seller Harbour Portfolio purchased in the GFC’s aftermath we can better understand how the racialized nature of the U.S. housing market creates different pathways for profit <em>and</em> deepens racial-income inequities. American Homes 4 Rent targeted properties in higher income, whiter exurban regions of Chicagoland whereas Harbour Portfolio concentrated its activity in lower-income, majority-minority communities largely within the City of Chicago.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2008 年全球金融危机(GFC)的破坏导致独户住宅租赁市场发生了长期的变化。各种投资者利用全球金融危机后的环境,专注于不良住房市场的不同领域。我们研究了两家著名公司在芝加哥地区的活动,以探讨全球金融危机后投资者的购买行为如何映射到种族化的地理环境中,而种族化的地理环境本身就是过去住房政策和做法的产物。从事土地合约销售和独户住宅出租(SFR)的全国性公司针对的是在更广泛的全球金融危机期间发生的止赎危机的不同部分。单户租赁的盈利策略要求购买可居住的房产,以吸引租户,而掠夺性的土地合约销售商则通过将房屋所有权的风险(和成本)转嫁给买家,从不良住房中获利。通过探究企业房东 "美国之家 4 号租赁公司"(American Homes 4 Rent)和土地合约卖家 "港湾投资组合"(Harbour Portfolio)在全球金融危机后购买房产的地理位置,我们可以更好地理解美国住房市场的种族性质是如何创造不同的盈利途径并加深种族收入不平等的。American Homes 4 Rent 将目标锁定在收入较高、白人较多的芝加哥郊区,而 Harbour Portfolio 则主要集中在芝加哥市内收入较低、少数族裔占多数的社区。
Uncovering racialized geographies: Investor strategies and the legacy of the 2008 financial crisis in Chicagoland
The wreckage of the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) led to long lasting changes in the single-family rental market. A variety of investors took advantage of the post-GFC environment, specializing in different segments of the distressed housing market. We examine two prominent companies’ activity in Chicagoland to explore how post-GFC investor purchases map onto a racialized geography that itself is a product of past housing policies and practices. National companies engaged in land contract sales and single-family rentals (SFR) targeted different sections of the foreclosure crisis that occurred during the broader GFC. While the SFR profit-strategy necessitates buying habitable properties that can attract tenants, predatory land contract sellers milk profit from distressed housing by offloading the risk (and cost) of homeownership to buyers. By exploring the geography of where the corporate landlord American Homes 4 Rent and land contract seller Harbour Portfolio purchased in the GFC’s aftermath we can better understand how the racialized nature of the U.S. housing market creates different pathways for profit and deepens racial-income inequities. American Homes 4 Rent targeted properties in higher income, whiter exurban regions of Chicagoland whereas Harbour Portfolio concentrated its activity in lower-income, majority-minority communities largely within the City of Chicago.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.