Philipp Diesing , Gabriel Lopez , Philipp Blechinger , Christian Breyer
{"title":"从知识差距到技术成熟:能源密集型产业深度减排途径的比较审查","authors":"Philipp Diesing , Gabriel Lopez , Philipp Blechinger , Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 115023"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From knowledge gaps to technological maturity: A comparative review of pathways to deep emission reduction for energy-intensive industries\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Diesing , Gabriel Lopez , Philipp Blechinger , Christian Breyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007494\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007494","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
From knowledge gaps to technological maturity: A comparative review of pathways to deep emission reduction for energy-intensive industries
Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.