从知识差距到技术成熟:能源密集型产业深度减排途径的比较审查

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.115023
Philipp Diesing , Gabriel Lopez , Philipp Blechinger , Christian Breyer
{"title":"从知识差距到技术成熟:能源密集型产业深度减排途径的比较审查","authors":"Philipp Diesing ,&nbsp;Gabriel Lopez ,&nbsp;Philipp Blechinger ,&nbsp;Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 115023"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From knowledge gaps to technological maturity: A comparative review of pathways to deep emission reduction for energy-intensive industries\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Diesing ,&nbsp;Gabriel Lopez ,&nbsp;Philipp Blechinger ,&nbsp;Christian Breyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007494\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007494","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钢铁、水泥、基础化工、铝、玻璃以及纸浆和造纸等能源密集型工业排放了大量温室气体,进一步加剧了气候变化。工业排放通常被认为难以消减,而技术解决方案往往尚未成熟。此外,对于每个工业部门的理想技术,还没有以结构化和比较的方式进行明确的研究,这也是本研究要解决的主要研究空白。为此,我们按照严格的规程进行了广泛、系统的文献综述。我们仔细阅读了大量研究报告并获取了相关信息。本研究的比较方法采用基于李克特量表的评分方法,为深入了解有利途径提供了一个稳健的框架,这在同类研究中尚属首次。研究结果表明,钢铁行业是研究得最好的行业部门,而水泥和玻璃行业则存在知识空白。研究结果进一步表明,对于大多数行业部门来说,通过回收利用进行二次生产是一种低风险的选择,它具有技术成熟度高、能源效率高、生产成本低等优点,同时又不影响可持续发展标准。热能直接电气化和以绿色电力为基础的氢原料对于实现一次生产零排放至关重要。研究结果表明,要在能源密集型产业中实现大幅减排,必须做出巨大努力,这就需要政府提供强有力的财政支持。重点应放在可再生电力、绿色氢气和循环利用上,将其作为这些努力的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From knowledge gaps to technological maturity: A comparative review of pathways to deep emission reduction for energy-intensive industries
Energy intensive industries, such as steel, cement, basic chemicals, aluminium, glass as well as pulp and paper contribute substantial amounts of greenhouse gas emissions, which further accelerate climate change. The emissions from industry are generally considered hard-to-abate and technological solutions are often not yet mature. Additionally, the ideal technologies for each industry sector are not yet clearly researched in a structured and comparative manner, which is the key research gap addressed by this study. To focus on this, an extensive, systemic literature review has been conducted, following a strict protocol. A vast number of studies have been carefully read and information obtained. The comparative approach of the study is expressed in a Likert-type scale-based scoring approach, providing a robust framework to gain insights into favourable pathways, which is the first of its kind. It could be demonstrated that the steel industry is the best researched industry sector while knowledge gaps exist for the cement and glass industry. The results further show that secondary production via recycling serves as a low-risk option for most industry sectors, providing benefits such as high technological maturity, energy efficiency, and low production costs, without compromising sustainability standards. Direct electrification of heat and green electricity-based hydrogen feedstocks are essential to reach zero emissions for primary production. The results indicate that substantial efforts are imperative for achieving significant emission reductions in energy-intensive industries, necessitating robust financial support from governments. Emphasis should be placed on renewable electricity, green hydrogen, and recycling as pivotal components of these efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling benefits: A framework for analyzing small hydropower refurbishment activities An efficient uncertainty analysis of performance of hydrogen storage systems Economic and environmentally efficient biochar production via microwave-assisted co-torrefaction of fruit residue and waste oil An interdisciplinary literature review of floating solar power plants A techno-economic analysis of communication in low-voltage islanded microgrids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1