复杂人-技系统的人为因素验证 - 需要更新技术基础并改进指南和标准

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106697
Per Øivind Braarud , Jinkyun Park , Jitae Kim , Johnny Short
{"title":"复杂人-技系统的人为因素验证 - 需要更新技术基础并改进指南和标准","authors":"Per Øivind Braarud ,&nbsp;Jinkyun Park ,&nbsp;Jitae Kim ,&nbsp;Johnny Short","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human Factors validation is a critical step in the design and development of complex human-technology systems such as nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, frequent validation challenges are reported by designers, vendors, and authorities, and this presents challenges when determining the acceptability of system design due to inefficient test scenarios, and inadequate human performance measures. This means that whilst existing guides and standards attempt to provide technical advice and a common basis for different stakeholders, validation teams continue to report limitations in the levels of support provided. This paper discusses a number of these human factors validation challenges and makes recommendations for future research to improve the technical basis of guides and standards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 106697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human factors validation of complex human-technology systems – Need for updating the technical basis and improving the guides and standards\",\"authors\":\"Per Øivind Braarud ,&nbsp;Jinkyun Park ,&nbsp;Jitae Kim ,&nbsp;Johnny Short\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Human Factors validation is a critical step in the design and development of complex human-technology systems such as nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, frequent validation challenges are reported by designers, vendors, and authorities, and this presents challenges when determining the acceptability of system design due to inefficient test scenarios, and inadequate human performance measures. This means that whilst existing guides and standards attempt to provide technical advice and a common basis for different stakeholders, validation teams continue to report limitations in the levels of support provided. This paper discusses a number of these human factors validation challenges and makes recommendations for future research to improve the technical basis of guides and standards.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"181 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400287X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400287X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人因验证是设计和开发核电站等复杂人机工程系统的关键步骤。遗憾的是,设计人员、供应商和权威机构经常报告验证方面的挑战,这给确定系统设计的可接受性带来了挑战,原因是测试场景效率低下,人的表现措施不足。这意味着,尽管现有的指南和标准试图为不同的利益相关者提供技术建议和共同基础,但验证团队仍然报告说,所提供的支持水平有限。本文讨论了其中一些人为因素验证方面的挑战,并对未来研究提出了建议,以改进指南和标准的技术基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human factors validation of complex human-technology systems – Need for updating the technical basis and improving the guides and standards
Human Factors validation is a critical step in the design and development of complex human-technology systems such as nuclear power plants. Unfortunately, frequent validation challenges are reported by designers, vendors, and authorities, and this presents challenges when determining the acceptability of system design due to inefficient test scenarios, and inadequate human performance measures. This means that whilst existing guides and standards attempt to provide technical advice and a common basis for different stakeholders, validation teams continue to report limitations in the levels of support provided. This paper discusses a number of these human factors validation challenges and makes recommendations for future research to improve the technical basis of guides and standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
The effect of the Labour Inspection Authority’s regulatory tools on compliance with regulations in the Norwegian home care services – A post-test-only control group study A novel methodology for quantifying the impact of dependent competing failure-induced performance degradation of fireproofing coatings on domino effect risk Editorial Board A systematic review of hazard recognition and risk perception research in the construction industry Investigating the predictive validity of subjective and objective measures for general aviation pilots’ risk propensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1