对接受硬膜外类固醇注射的腰椎退行性疾病患者进行基于智能手机的 6 分钟步行测试的外部验证

Michal Ziga MD , Martin N. Stienen MD/FEBNS , Anna Maria Zeitlberger MD , Stefanos Voglis MD , Luca Regli MD , Oliver Bozinov MD , Nicolai Maldaner MD
{"title":"对接受硬膜外类固醇注射的腰椎退行性疾病患者进行基于智能手机的 6 分钟步行测试的外部验证","authors":"Michal Ziga MD ,&nbsp;Martin N. Stienen MD/FEBNS ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Zeitlberger MD ,&nbsp;Stefanos Voglis MD ,&nbsp;Luca Regli MD ,&nbsp;Oliver Bozinov MD ,&nbsp;Nicolai Maldaner MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>About 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was −2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=−0.30, ODI r=−0.43, COMI back r=−0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p&lt;.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of the smartphone-based 6-minute walking test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders undergoing epidural steroid injection\",\"authors\":\"Michal Ziga MD ,&nbsp;Martin N. Stienen MD/FEBNS ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Zeitlberger MD ,&nbsp;Stefanos Voglis MD ,&nbsp;Luca Regli MD ,&nbsp;Oliver Bozinov MD ,&nbsp;Nicolai Maldaner MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>About 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was −2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=−0.30, ODI r=−0.43, COMI back r=−0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p&lt;.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Spine Society Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Spine Society Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景6分钟步行测试(6WT)曾被证明是对接受腰椎退行性疾病(DLD)手术的患者进行可靠有效的结果测量。方法对约50名计划接受硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)的DLD患者进行评估,评估方法包括基于智能手机的6分钟步行测试和常见的纸质患者报告结局测量(PROMs),包括核心结局测量指数[COMI]背部、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和简表调查(SF-12)。皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)用于确定 6WT 与 PROMs 之间的关系。通过类内相关系数(ICC)确定了 6WT 的可靠性。结果 共纳入了 50 名患者(平均年龄 52 岁,SD 13;女性占 25%),包括 35 名腰椎间盘突出症患者(70%)和 15 名腰椎管狭窄症患者(30%)。6分钟步行距离(6WD)的平均值为454.1米(标清89.1);经年龄和性别调整后的OFI z分数平均值为-2.1(标清4.0)。共有 17 名(34%)患者有轻度 OFI,8 名(16%)患者有中度 OFI,4 名(8%)患者有重度 OFI,而 21 名(42%)患者的 6WT 结果在正常人群范围内(无 OFI)。6WD 和 VAS 背痛之间的 PCC 分别为 r=-0.30、ODI r=-0.43、COMI back r=-0.36、PCS-12 r=0.51(均为 p<.05)。结论这项在保守治疗的 DLD 患者队列中进行的外部验证证实了 6WT 的可靠性和内容有效性,与原始手术队列相比,6WT 具有相似的 PCC 和 PROM。结果证实,6WT 是在门诊环境中评估 DLD 患者 OFI 和各种功能限制的有效和实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
External validation of the smartphone-based 6-minute walking test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders undergoing epidural steroid injection

Background

The 6-minute walking test (6WT) has previously shown to be reliable and valid outcome measure in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative lumbar disorders (DLD). A role of 6WT in conservatively treated patients undergoing epidural steroid injection (ESI) remains unclear.

Methods

About 50 patients with DLD, scheduled for ESI were assessed by the smartphone-based 6WT and common paper-based patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Core Outcome Measures Index [COMI] back, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Short Form Survey (SF-12). Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) was used to define the relationship between 6WT and PROMs. Reliability of the 6WT was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Age- and sex-adjusted objective functional impairment (OFI) z-scores were calculated for each patient.

Results

A total of 50 patients (mean age 52 years, SD 13; 25% female), including 35 patients (70%) with lumbar disc herniation and 15 patients (30%) with lumbar spinal stenosis were included. The mean 6-minute walking distance (6WD) was 454.1 m (SD 89.1); the age- and sex-adjusted mean OFI z-score was −2.1 (SD 4.0). A total of 17 (34%) patients had mild, 8 (16%) moderate, and 4 (8%) severe OFI, while 21 (42%) had 6WT results within the normal population range (no OFI). The PCCs between the 6WD and VAS back pain were r=−0.30, ODI r=−0.43, COMI back r=−0.36, and PCS-12 r=0.51 (all p<.05). The ICC of the 6WT was β=0.92.

Conclusions

This external validation in a patient cohort with DLD, which was managed conservatively, confirms the reliability and content validity of the 6WT with similar PCCs with PROMs compared to the original surgical cohort. The results confirm the 6WT as a valid and useful tool for assessing OFI in patients with DLD and a broad range of functional restrictions in an outpatient setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
48 days
期刊最新文献
Spine surgery and readmission: Risk factors in lumbar corpectomy patients Common spine codes are reimbursed 13% less by Medicaid compared to Medicare, ranging from 46% to 160% by state A systematic review of bone graft products used in lumbar interbody fusion procedures for degenerative disc disease The association of hip range of movement, and its side-to-side asymmetries, and non-specific lower back pain in adults aged 40 years and older Neurological deterioration in an adult patient with split cord malformation following untethering via filum sectioning: Case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1