Shih-Jung Wang , Yan-Yao Lin , Ying-Han Chen , Chia-Lin Chung , Wen-Chi Lai , Chien-Chung Ke
{"title":"整合多种观测数据,验证地震触发地下水位异常的机理:2016 年台湾美浓地震","authors":"Shih-Jung Wang , Yan-Yao Lin , Ying-Han Chen , Chia-Lin Chung , Wen-Chi Lai , Chien-Chung Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes multi-depth groundwater level data and integrated observation data to validate the previously proposed mechanisms of hydrological anomalies triggered by the 2016 M6.4 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan. The main influence area was northwest of the epicenter, which may be due to the blind fault rupture, intensity distribution, and hydrogeological properties. The step changes in groundwater level do not fit the concept of epicentral distance, static stress–strain theory, or the focal mechanism. The distribution of step changes in groundwater level have a pattern similar to that of horizontal peak ground velocity. The results imply that these changes may be driven by dynamic stress–strain, instead of static stress–strain. The minimum horizontal peak ground velocity and acceleration of the Meinong earthquake, which induced obvious step changes in groundwater level and soil liquefaction, are provided. The pressure dissipation ability of an aquifer (e.g., transmissivity) may affect the persistence of groundwater responses. Four wells located near the surface rupture area, which has cemented or partial cemented geological material, showed an obvious step decrease in the groundwater level at a deep depth and all wells showed an increase in the groundwater level at a shallow depth. These decreases and increases of the groundwater level at different depths have different mechanisms, which are discussed in this study. The integrated observations made during the Meinong earthquake show that ground motion and the hydraulic properties might be important factors in hydrological anomalies. The results of this study are an important reference for further studies on earthquake hydrology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"645 ","pages":"Article 132230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration of multiple observations for validation of mechanisms of earthquake-triggered groundwater level Anomalies: 2016 Taiwan Meinong earthquake\",\"authors\":\"Shih-Jung Wang , Yan-Yao Lin , Ying-Han Chen , Chia-Lin Chung , Wen-Chi Lai , Chien-Chung Ke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study analyzes multi-depth groundwater level data and integrated observation data to validate the previously proposed mechanisms of hydrological anomalies triggered by the 2016 M6.4 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan. The main influence area was northwest of the epicenter, which may be due to the blind fault rupture, intensity distribution, and hydrogeological properties. The step changes in groundwater level do not fit the concept of epicentral distance, static stress–strain theory, or the focal mechanism. The distribution of step changes in groundwater level have a pattern similar to that of horizontal peak ground velocity. The results imply that these changes may be driven by dynamic stress–strain, instead of static stress–strain. The minimum horizontal peak ground velocity and acceleration of the Meinong earthquake, which induced obvious step changes in groundwater level and soil liquefaction, are provided. The pressure dissipation ability of an aquifer (e.g., transmissivity) may affect the persistence of groundwater responses. Four wells located near the surface rupture area, which has cemented or partial cemented geological material, showed an obvious step decrease in the groundwater level at a deep depth and all wells showed an increase in the groundwater level at a shallow depth. These decreases and increases of the groundwater level at different depths have different mechanisms, which are discussed in this study. The integrated observations made during the Meinong earthquake show that ground motion and the hydraulic properties might be important factors in hydrological anomalies. The results of this study are an important reference for further studies on earthquake hydrology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"645 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016263\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424016263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integration of multiple observations for validation of mechanisms of earthquake-triggered groundwater level Anomalies: 2016 Taiwan Meinong earthquake
This study analyzes multi-depth groundwater level data and integrated observation data to validate the previously proposed mechanisms of hydrological anomalies triggered by the 2016 M6.4 Meinong earthquake in Taiwan. The main influence area was northwest of the epicenter, which may be due to the blind fault rupture, intensity distribution, and hydrogeological properties. The step changes in groundwater level do not fit the concept of epicentral distance, static stress–strain theory, or the focal mechanism. The distribution of step changes in groundwater level have a pattern similar to that of horizontal peak ground velocity. The results imply that these changes may be driven by dynamic stress–strain, instead of static stress–strain. The minimum horizontal peak ground velocity and acceleration of the Meinong earthquake, which induced obvious step changes in groundwater level and soil liquefaction, are provided. The pressure dissipation ability of an aquifer (e.g., transmissivity) may affect the persistence of groundwater responses. Four wells located near the surface rupture area, which has cemented or partial cemented geological material, showed an obvious step decrease in the groundwater level at a deep depth and all wells showed an increase in the groundwater level at a shallow depth. These decreases and increases of the groundwater level at different depths have different mechanisms, which are discussed in this study. The integrated observations made during the Meinong earthquake show that ground motion and the hydraulic properties might be important factors in hydrological anomalies. The results of this study are an important reference for further studies on earthquake hydrology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.