剖析目的地抵制:解读政治化旅游业中的道德困境

IF 8.9 2区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Destination Marketing & Management Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100950
Siamak Seyfi , Abolfazl Siyamiyan Gorji , Salar Kuhzady , C. Michael Hall , Dagnachew Leta Senbeto
{"title":"剖析目的地抵制:解读政治化旅游业中的道德困境","authors":"Siamak Seyfi ,&nbsp;Abolfazl Siyamiyan Gorji ,&nbsp;Salar Kuhzady ,&nbsp;C. Michael Hall ,&nbsp;Dagnachew Leta Senbeto","doi":"10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Informed by political consumerism theory and employing a multi-case approach, this study examines the different factors influencing tourists' decisions to participate in or abstain from destination boycotts. Through an analysis of online narratives, the study identifies and discusses key manifestations of ethical dilemmas in tourists' boycott decisions, reflecting both the transformative potential of boycotts and doubts about their effectiveness. The findings indicate that participation in boycotts is driven by perceived egregiousness, the empowerment of change through tourism, and ethical and moral considerations. Conversely, rejection of boycotts often stems from the contentious nature of certain boycotts, skepticism about their effectiveness, concerns about local welfare, the desire to avoid collective punishment, and the double standard dilemma. By introducing the concept of ‘politicized tourism consumerism’, this study highlights tourism's potential to drive social change and offers novel theoretical insights into tourists' politicized tourism practices and their implications. These insights can help tourism stakeholders, including policymakers and businesses, develop strategies to address ethical concerns and boycott impacts, leading to more ethical and responsible tourism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100950"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting destination boycotts: Unpacking ethical dilemmas in politicized tourism\",\"authors\":\"Siamak Seyfi ,&nbsp;Abolfazl Siyamiyan Gorji ,&nbsp;Salar Kuhzady ,&nbsp;C. Michael Hall ,&nbsp;Dagnachew Leta Senbeto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdmm.2024.100950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Informed by political consumerism theory and employing a multi-case approach, this study examines the different factors influencing tourists' decisions to participate in or abstain from destination boycotts. Through an analysis of online narratives, the study identifies and discusses key manifestations of ethical dilemmas in tourists' boycott decisions, reflecting both the transformative potential of boycotts and doubts about their effectiveness. The findings indicate that participation in boycotts is driven by perceived egregiousness, the empowerment of change through tourism, and ethical and moral considerations. Conversely, rejection of boycotts often stems from the contentious nature of certain boycotts, skepticism about their effectiveness, concerns about local welfare, the desire to avoid collective punishment, and the double standard dilemma. By introducing the concept of ‘politicized tourism consumerism’, this study highlights tourism's potential to drive social change and offers novel theoretical insights into tourists' politicized tourism practices and their implications. These insights can help tourism stakeholders, including policymakers and businesses, develop strategies to address ethical concerns and boycott impacts, leading to more ethical and responsible tourism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212571X24000982\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Destination Marketing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212571X24000982","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以政治消费主义理论为指导,采用多案例研究方法,探讨了影响游客决定参与或放弃目的地抵制行动的不同因素。通过对在线叙述的分析,本研究确定并讨论了游客抵制决定中道德困境的主要表现形式,既反映了抵制的变革潜力,也反映了对其有效性的怀疑。研究结果表明,参与抵制行动的驱动因素包括:游客认为抵制行动的恶劣程度、通过旅游业实现变革的动力以及伦理道德方面的考虑。反之,拒绝抵制往往源于某些抵制活动的争议性、对其有效性的怀疑、对当地福利的担忧、避免集体惩罚的愿望以及双重标准困境。通过引入 "政治化旅游消费主义 "的概念,本研究强调了旅游业推动社会变革的潜力,并为游客的政治化旅游行为及其影响提供了新颖的理论见解。这些见解可帮助包括政策制定者和企业在内的旅游业利益相关者制定战略,以解决道德问题和抵制影响,从而实现更加道德和负责任的旅游业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissecting destination boycotts: Unpacking ethical dilemmas in politicized tourism
Informed by political consumerism theory and employing a multi-case approach, this study examines the different factors influencing tourists' decisions to participate in or abstain from destination boycotts. Through an analysis of online narratives, the study identifies and discusses key manifestations of ethical dilemmas in tourists' boycott decisions, reflecting both the transformative potential of boycotts and doubts about their effectiveness. The findings indicate that participation in boycotts is driven by perceived egregiousness, the empowerment of change through tourism, and ethical and moral considerations. Conversely, rejection of boycotts often stems from the contentious nature of certain boycotts, skepticism about their effectiveness, concerns about local welfare, the desire to avoid collective punishment, and the double standard dilemma. By introducing the concept of ‘politicized tourism consumerism’, this study highlights tourism's potential to drive social change and offers novel theoretical insights into tourists' politicized tourism practices and their implications. These insights can help tourism stakeholders, including policymakers and businesses, develop strategies to address ethical concerns and boycott impacts, leading to more ethical and responsible tourism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
46
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Destination Marketing & Management (JDMM) is an international journal that focuses on the study of tourist destinations, specifically their marketing and management. It aims to provide a critical understanding of all aspects of destination marketing and management, considering their unique contexts in terms of policy, planning, economics, geography, and history. The journal seeks to develop a strong theoretical foundation in this field by incorporating knowledge from various disciplinary approaches. Additionally, JDMM aims to promote critical thinking and innovation in destination marketing and management, expand the boundaries of knowledge, and serve as a platform for international idea exchange.
期刊最新文献
Beyond attraction: Unveiling Bali's cultural community's role in bolstering tourism resilience amidst the COVID-19 pandemic Perception disparity: Analyzing the destination image of Uzbekistan among residents and non-visitors Optimal-fit model of risk perception and travel-related behaviors during a global pandemic Women travelers and social media: Charting the path to economic and entrepreneurial opportunities Effects of liquor and wine heritage stimuli on tourists’ experiential value and behavioral intentions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1