Jorge Valverde-Carbonell , Carlo Pietrobelli , María de las Mercedes Menéndez
{"title":"矿产的关键性与国家的矿业竞争力:一枚硬币的两面","authors":"Jorge Valverde-Carbonell , Carlo Pietrobelli , María de las Mercedes Menéndez","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article introduces a novel theoretical and empirical framework for estimating the criticality of key minerals that are intensively used in the energy transition and the mining competitiveness of countries producing them, using economic complexity techniques.</div><div>The theoretical framework proposes that the most competitive countries are those exporting a broad range of mineral goods, including the most critical ones. Meanwhile, the most critical minerals are the least ubiquitous and are exported by the most competitive countries. The empirical framework relies on an endogenous system of equations in which countries’ mining competitiveness and mineral criticality are simultaneously co-determined. The equation system is solved using the Fitness-Criticality algorithm (FCa), an adaptation of the Economic Fitness-Complexity algorithm.</div><div>The results show that South Africa, Russia, the United States, and China are the most competitive mining countries. Meanwhile, the platinum group metals, silicon, rare earths, and lithium are the most critical minerals. These results are consistent with other methodologies employed by different experts that separately estimate both dimensions and derive rankings of countries and minerals, but are obtained with a methodology that offers substantial advantages.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105359"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minerals’ criticality and countries' mining competitiveness: Two faces of the same coin\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Valverde-Carbonell , Carlo Pietrobelli , María de las Mercedes Menéndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article introduces a novel theoretical and empirical framework for estimating the criticality of key minerals that are intensively used in the energy transition and the mining competitiveness of countries producing them, using economic complexity techniques.</div><div>The theoretical framework proposes that the most competitive countries are those exporting a broad range of mineral goods, including the most critical ones. Meanwhile, the most critical minerals are the least ubiquitous and are exported by the most competitive countries. The empirical framework relies on an endogenous system of equations in which countries’ mining competitiveness and mineral criticality are simultaneously co-determined. The equation system is solved using the Fitness-Criticality algorithm (FCa), an adaptation of the Economic Fitness-Complexity algorithm.</div><div>The results show that South Africa, Russia, the United States, and China are the most competitive mining countries. Meanwhile, the platinum group metals, silicon, rare earths, and lithium are the most critical minerals. These results are consistent with other methodologies employed by different experts that separately estimate both dimensions and derive rankings of countries and minerals, but are obtained with a methodology that offers substantial advantages.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724007268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minerals’ criticality and countries' mining competitiveness: Two faces of the same coin
This article introduces a novel theoretical and empirical framework for estimating the criticality of key minerals that are intensively used in the energy transition and the mining competitiveness of countries producing them, using economic complexity techniques.
The theoretical framework proposes that the most competitive countries are those exporting a broad range of mineral goods, including the most critical ones. Meanwhile, the most critical minerals are the least ubiquitous and are exported by the most competitive countries. The empirical framework relies on an endogenous system of equations in which countries’ mining competitiveness and mineral criticality are simultaneously co-determined. The equation system is solved using the Fitness-Criticality algorithm (FCa), an adaptation of the Economic Fitness-Complexity algorithm.
The results show that South Africa, Russia, the United States, and China are the most competitive mining countries. Meanwhile, the platinum group metals, silicon, rare earths, and lithium are the most critical minerals. These results are consistent with other methodologies employed by different experts that separately estimate both dimensions and derive rankings of countries and minerals, but are obtained with a methodology that offers substantial advantages.
期刊介绍:
Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.