持续评估的新方法:从紧张的分数总和转向通过自我反思进行有意义的学习

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072
Yeray Rodríguez Rincón , Ana Munárriz , Alberto Magreñán Ruiz
{"title":"持续评估的新方法:从紧张的分数总和转向通过自我反思进行有意义的学习","authors":"Yeray Rodríguez Rincón ,&nbsp;Ana Munárriz ,&nbsp;Alberto Magreñán Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper proposes a new approach of continuous assessment of a formative nature, aimed at achieving meaningful learning with lower stress levels. This approach minimizes the punitive nature of traditional summative continuous assessment and replaces typical graded activities with self-reflecting ones. To conduct the formative evaluation, a teaching model has been developed to guide the choice of feedback and feed-forward strategies to be implemented by the instructors, depending on the students’ levels of competence and confidence. To validate the effectiveness of this approach, a quasi-experimental design was employed, with the new continuous assessment method in the experimental group and the summative continuous assessment method in the control group. The experiment was conducted in a Mathematics course with undergraduate Economics and Business students. Data were collected through test scores and a perception questionnaire. The results indicate that the new evaluation method promotes meaningful learning and yields better academic results compared to the traditional continuous evaluation. Students expressed high satisfaction with the new approach, noting that it allows them to understand their formative status and address deficiencies before undertaking evaluable activities. They also believe this strategy helps reduce the stress associated with the summative evaluation itself.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"22 3","pages":"Article 101072"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to continuous assessment: Moving from a stressful sum of grades to meaningful learning through self-reflection\",\"authors\":\"Yeray Rodríguez Rincón ,&nbsp;Ana Munárriz ,&nbsp;Alberto Magreñán Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper proposes a new approach of continuous assessment of a formative nature, aimed at achieving meaningful learning with lower stress levels. This approach minimizes the punitive nature of traditional summative continuous assessment and replaces typical graded activities with self-reflecting ones. To conduct the formative evaluation, a teaching model has been developed to guide the choice of feedback and feed-forward strategies to be implemented by the instructors, depending on the students’ levels of competence and confidence. To validate the effectiveness of this approach, a quasi-experimental design was employed, with the new continuous assessment method in the experimental group and the summative continuous assessment method in the control group. The experiment was conducted in a Mathematics course with undergraduate Economics and Business students. Data were collected through test scores and a perception questionnaire. The results indicate that the new evaluation method promotes meaningful learning and yields better academic results compared to the traditional continuous evaluation. Students expressed high satisfaction with the new approach, noting that it allows them to understand their formative status and address deficiencies before undertaking evaluable activities. They also believe this strategy helps reduce the stress associated with the summative evaluation itself.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种新的形成性持续评估方法,旨在以较低的压力实现有意义的学习。这种方法最大限度地减少了传统终结性持续评估的惩罚性质,并以自我反思活动取代了典型的评分活动。为了进行形成性评价,我们开发了一个教学模式,指导教师根据学生的能力和信心水平选择反馈和前馈策略。为了验证这种方法的有效性,我们采用了准实验设计,实验组采用新的连续性评价方法,对照组采用终结性连续性评价方法。实验在经济学和商学本科生的数学课程中进行。通过考试成绩和认知问卷收集数据。结果表明,与传统的连续评价相比,新的评价方法促进了有意义的学习,并取得了更好的学习成绩。学生对新方法的满意度很高,认为它能让他们了解自己的成长状况,并在开展可评价活动之前解决不足之处。他们还认为,这种策略有助于减轻与终结性评价本身相关的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach to continuous assessment: Moving from a stressful sum of grades to meaningful learning through self-reflection
This paper proposes a new approach of continuous assessment of a formative nature, aimed at achieving meaningful learning with lower stress levels. This approach minimizes the punitive nature of traditional summative continuous assessment and replaces typical graded activities with self-reflecting ones. To conduct the formative evaluation, a teaching model has been developed to guide the choice of feedback and feed-forward strategies to be implemented by the instructors, depending on the students’ levels of competence and confidence. To validate the effectiveness of this approach, a quasi-experimental design was employed, with the new continuous assessment method in the experimental group and the summative continuous assessment method in the control group. The experiment was conducted in a Mathematics course with undergraduate Economics and Business students. Data were collected through test scores and a perception questionnaire. The results indicate that the new evaluation method promotes meaningful learning and yields better academic results compared to the traditional continuous evaluation. Students expressed high satisfaction with the new approach, noting that it allows them to understand their formative status and address deficiencies before undertaking evaluable activities. They also believe this strategy helps reduce the stress associated with the summative evaluation itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
An effective method in project management education: A stepwise project modelled on a real-life project Developing and validating an instrument to measure model-reality fit in business simulation-based learning contexts The impact of cultural values on students’ communication apprehension in online classrooms: The moderating role of gender Making sense of generative AI for assessments: Contrasting student claims and assessor evaluations Can generative AI motivate management students? The role of perceived value and information literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1