西方作为方法 "是如何失败的?中国视角下的创业教育研究

IF 6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101073
Xuyan Wang , Shuhua Liu , Lingli Zhang
{"title":"西方作为方法 \"是如何失败的?中国视角下的创业教育研究","authors":"Xuyan Wang ,&nbsp;Shuhua Liu ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's entrepreneurship education has developed a unique model that positions entrepreneurship education as a critical means of talent cultivation, resulting in the “learning through competition” model. Entrepreneurship education in China, imported primarily from the United States, exhibits significant differences. Existing research has highlighted these disparities; however, there is a notable lack of in-depth, detailed descriptions and comprehensive analyses of their underlying causes. Employing qualitative research methods, this study examines how these differences are shaped from a Chinese perspective. It reveals how Chinese higher education perpetuates an Americentric canon within the social sciences, but fails to implement “the West as method” in entrepreneurship education. However, while China has adopted the external aspects of American entrepreneurship education—such as curricula, competitions, and mentorship—the internal logic of the Chinese system differs significantly, resulting in two distinct educational landscapes. Key factor contributing to the China-US differences include market maturity, deficiencies in Chinese comparative education, China's principles of equality rooted in its socialist ideology, the politicized nature of its education system, and a pervasive hustle culture. These elements have shaped China's entrepreneurship education goals, teacher cohorts, landscape and business plan competitions in ways that are distinct from those in the United States. By adopting an ‘Eastern as method’ perspective, this research enriches the discourse on entrepreneurship education and encourages deeper reflection on current practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"22 3","pages":"Article 101073"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How the “West as method” fails: A study of entrepreneurship education from the perspective of China\",\"authors\":\"Xuyan Wang ,&nbsp;Shuhua Liu ,&nbsp;Lingli Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's entrepreneurship education has developed a unique model that positions entrepreneurship education as a critical means of talent cultivation, resulting in the “learning through competition” model. Entrepreneurship education in China, imported primarily from the United States, exhibits significant differences. Existing research has highlighted these disparities; however, there is a notable lack of in-depth, detailed descriptions and comprehensive analyses of their underlying causes. Employing qualitative research methods, this study examines how these differences are shaped from a Chinese perspective. It reveals how Chinese higher education perpetuates an Americentric canon within the social sciences, but fails to implement “the West as method” in entrepreneurship education. However, while China has adopted the external aspects of American entrepreneurship education—such as curricula, competitions, and mentorship—the internal logic of the Chinese system differs significantly, resulting in two distinct educational landscapes. Key factor contributing to the China-US differences include market maturity, deficiencies in Chinese comparative education, China's principles of equality rooted in its socialist ideology, the politicized nature of its education system, and a pervasive hustle culture. These elements have shaped China's entrepreneurship education goals, teacher cohorts, landscape and business plan competitions in ways that are distinct from those in the United States. By adopting an ‘Eastern as method’ perspective, this research enriches the discourse on entrepreneurship education and encourages deeper reflection on current practices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001447\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811724001447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的创业教育形成了独特的模式,将创业教育定位为人才培养的重要手段,形成了 "在竞争中学习 "的模式。中国的创业教育主要从美国引进,表现出显著的差异。现有研究已经强调了这些差异,但明显缺乏对其深层原因的深入、详细描述和全面分析。本研究采用定性研究方法,从中国人的视角探讨了这些差异是如何形成的。研究揭示了中国高等教育如何在社会科学领域延续美国中心论,却未能在创业教育中贯彻 "以西方为方法"。然而,虽然中国采用了美国创业教育的外在形式,如课程、竞赛和导师制,但中国体系的内在逻辑却大相径庭,从而形成了两种截然不同的教育景观。造成中美差异的关键因素包括市场成熟度、中国比较教育的缺陷、中国植根于社会主义意识形态的平等原则、教育体系的政治化性质以及无处不在的喧嚣文化。这些因素决定了中国的创业教育目标、教师队伍、景观和商业计划竞赛与美国不同。通过采用 "东方即方法 "的视角,本研究丰富了有关创业教育的论述,并鼓励对当前实践进行更深入的反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How the “West as method” fails: A study of entrepreneurship education from the perspective of China
China's entrepreneurship education has developed a unique model that positions entrepreneurship education as a critical means of talent cultivation, resulting in the “learning through competition” model. Entrepreneurship education in China, imported primarily from the United States, exhibits significant differences. Existing research has highlighted these disparities; however, there is a notable lack of in-depth, detailed descriptions and comprehensive analyses of their underlying causes. Employing qualitative research methods, this study examines how these differences are shaped from a Chinese perspective. It reveals how Chinese higher education perpetuates an Americentric canon within the social sciences, but fails to implement “the West as method” in entrepreneurship education. However, while China has adopted the external aspects of American entrepreneurship education—such as curricula, competitions, and mentorship—the internal logic of the Chinese system differs significantly, resulting in two distinct educational landscapes. Key factor contributing to the China-US differences include market maturity, deficiencies in Chinese comparative education, China's principles of equality rooted in its socialist ideology, the politicized nature of its education system, and a pervasive hustle culture. These elements have shaped China's entrepreneurship education goals, teacher cohorts, landscape and business plan competitions in ways that are distinct from those in the United States. By adopting an ‘Eastern as method’ perspective, this research enriches the discourse on entrepreneurship education and encourages deeper reflection on current practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
An effective method in project management education: A stepwise project modelled on a real-life project Developing and validating an instrument to measure model-reality fit in business simulation-based learning contexts The impact of cultural values on students’ communication apprehension in online classrooms: The moderating role of gender Making sense of generative AI for assessments: Contrasting student claims and assessor evaluations Can generative AI motivate management students? The role of perceived value and information literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1