牙周骨内缺损的釉质基质衍生物单一疗法与植骨联合疗法对比:最新综述

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Japanese Dental Science Review Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.08.001
Akira Hasuike , Taito Watanabe , Akemu Hirooka , Shingi Arai , Hideyasu Akutagawa , Naoto Yoshinuma , Shuichi Sato
{"title":"牙周骨内缺损的釉质基质衍生物单一疗法与植骨联合疗法对比:最新综述","authors":"Akira Hasuike ,&nbsp;Taito Watanabe ,&nbsp;Akemu Hirooka ,&nbsp;Shingi Arai ,&nbsp;Hideyasu Akutagawa ,&nbsp;Naoto Yoshinuma ,&nbsp;Shuichi Sato","doi":"10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of combining enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with various bone grafts in periodontal regenerative surgery, specifically targeting intrabony defects. Randomized controlled trials with 12-month follow-ups were included. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical attachment level, probing depth, gingival recession, and radiographic defect fill. Meta-analysis showed that adding bone grafts to EMD does not provide additional benefits in periodontal tissue examination, with improvement observed only in radiographic defect fill. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of different bone graft types, revealing that alloplastic bone grafts are effective in radiographic defect fill. The risk of bias assessment indicated a moderate risk across studies, with challenges in blinding owing to the nature of the surgical treatment. Furthermore, a minimal intervention surgical approach may not require additional bone grafts for optimal periodontal regeneration. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue in the field and guide clinicians toward evidence-based decisions for optimal periodontal outcomes, emphasizing the judicious use of bone grafts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51334,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Dental Science Review","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 239-249"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enamel matrix derivative monotherapy versus combination therapy with bone grafts for periodontal intrabony defects: An updated review\",\"authors\":\"Akira Hasuike ,&nbsp;Taito Watanabe ,&nbsp;Akemu Hirooka ,&nbsp;Shingi Arai ,&nbsp;Hideyasu Akutagawa ,&nbsp;Naoto Yoshinuma ,&nbsp;Shuichi Sato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of combining enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with various bone grafts in periodontal regenerative surgery, specifically targeting intrabony defects. Randomized controlled trials with 12-month follow-ups were included. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical attachment level, probing depth, gingival recession, and radiographic defect fill. Meta-analysis showed that adding bone grafts to EMD does not provide additional benefits in periodontal tissue examination, with improvement observed only in radiographic defect fill. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of different bone graft types, revealing that alloplastic bone grafts are effective in radiographic defect fill. The risk of bias assessment indicated a moderate risk across studies, with challenges in blinding owing to the nature of the surgical treatment. Furthermore, a minimal intervention surgical approach may not require additional bone grafts for optimal periodontal regeneration. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue in the field and guide clinicians toward evidence-based decisions for optimal periodontal outcomes, emphasizing the judicious use of bone grafts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Dental Science Review\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 239-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Dental Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761624000140\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Dental Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761624000140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统性综述评估了在牙周再生手术中将釉基质衍生物(EMD)与各种骨移植相结合的效果,特别是针对骨内缺损的效果。研究纳入了随访 12 个月的随机对照试验。评估的临床结果包括临床附着水平、探诊深度、牙龈退缩和放射学缺陷填充。Meta 分析表明,在 EMD 中添加植骨并不能为牙周组织检查带来额外的益处,只有在放射学缺损填充方面才能观察到改善。亚组分析研究了不同植骨类型的影响,发现异体骨移植对放射学缺陷填充有效。偏倚风险评估显示,各项研究均存在中度偏倚风险,由于手术治疗的性质,在盲法方面存在挑战。此外,最小干预手术方法可能不需要额外的骨移植就能达到最佳牙周再生效果。这些研究结果为该领域的持续对话做出了贡献,并指导临床医生做出以证据为基础的决定,以获得最佳的牙周效果,同时强调了骨移植的明智使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enamel matrix derivative monotherapy versus combination therapy with bone grafts for periodontal intrabony defects: An updated review
This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of combining enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with various bone grafts in periodontal regenerative surgery, specifically targeting intrabony defects. Randomized controlled trials with 12-month follow-ups were included. Clinical outcomes assessed included clinical attachment level, probing depth, gingival recession, and radiographic defect fill. Meta-analysis showed that adding bone grafts to EMD does not provide additional benefits in periodontal tissue examination, with improvement observed only in radiographic defect fill. Subgroup analyses examined the impact of different bone graft types, revealing that alloplastic bone grafts are effective in radiographic defect fill. The risk of bias assessment indicated a moderate risk across studies, with challenges in blinding owing to the nature of the surgical treatment. Furthermore, a minimal intervention surgical approach may not require additional bone grafts for optimal periodontal regeneration. These findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue in the field and guide clinicians toward evidence-based decisions for optimal periodontal outcomes, emphasizing the judicious use of bone grafts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Dental Science Review
Japanese Dental Science Review DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Japanese Dental Science Review is published by the Japanese Association for Dental Science aiming to introduce the modern aspects of the dental basic and clinical sciences in Japan, and to share and discuss the update information with foreign researchers and dentists for further development of dentistry. In principle, papers are written and submitted on the invitation of one of the Editors, although the Editors would be glad to receive suggestions. Proposals for review articles should be sent by the authors to one of the Editors by e-mail. All submitted papers are subject to the peer- refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Effects of phototherapy in patients with idiopathic facial palsy: Scoping review Enamel matrix derivative monotherapy versus combination therapy with bone grafts for periodontal intrabony defects: An updated review Associations between metabolic disorders and Sjögren's disease Optimal storage time and temperature of human oral samples to minimize microbiome changes: A scoping review Current trends in digital shade matching – A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1