巴西公共卫生系统中 2 型糖尿病患者的远程会诊:随机、实用、开放标签、第 2 阶段、非劣效试验(TELECONSULTA 糖尿病试验)

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Lancet Regional Health-Americas Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100923
{"title":"巴西公共卫生系统中 2 型糖尿病患者的远程会诊:随机、实用、开放标签、第 2 阶段、非劣效试验(TELECONSULTA 糖尿病试验)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2024.100923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study addresses the rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and explores the potential of teleconsultation, as an alternative for diabetes management. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that teleconsultation is non-inferior to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control measured as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (non-inferiority margin for the upper confidence interval for the difference between groups of 0,5% in HbA1c) for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients referred from Primary Healthcare to Specialized Care within the SUS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TELECONSULTA, is a randomized, pragmatic, phase 2, single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority trial conducted in Joinville, Brazil. A total of 278 participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were randomized through mandatory teleconsulting services from primary care health units. The randomization was 1:1 to teleconsultation or face to face consultation. The study was registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trial Register—REBEC, under the code RBR-8gpgyd. Study status is “Completed”.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>This study included 278 participants in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The median age was 61 (54–68) years, 167 (60%) were women. The between-groups comparative average reduction in HbA1c was −0.6% (90% CI −1.0; −0.1) at 3-months and −0.5% (90% CI −0.9; 0.0) at 6-months in Modified Intention-to-Treat (mITT) population with imputed data, showing the non-inferiority of teleconsultation. Results with no missing data imputation and in the per protocol population were similar. The frequency of hypoglycaemia and other adverse events was well balanced between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The results underscore the transformative potential of telemedicine in addressing the complexities of diabetes management within the framework of a universal healthcare system, contributing with valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and practitioners seeking innovative solutions to tackle the growing diabetes epidemic.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was funded by the <span>Brazilian Ministry of Health</span>, through the <span>Unified Health System</span>–<span>Institutional Development Support Program</span> (PROADI-SUS).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teleconsultation on patients with type 2 diabetes in the Brazilian public health system: a randomised, pragmatic, open-label, phase 2, non-inferiority trial (TELECONSULTA diabetes trial)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lana.2024.100923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study addresses the rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and explores the potential of teleconsultation, as an alternative for diabetes management. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that teleconsultation is non-inferior to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control measured as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (non-inferiority margin for the upper confidence interval for the difference between groups of 0,5% in HbA1c) for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients referred from Primary Healthcare to Specialized Care within the SUS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>TELECONSULTA, is a randomized, pragmatic, phase 2, single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority trial conducted in Joinville, Brazil. A total of 278 participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were randomized through mandatory teleconsulting services from primary care health units. The randomization was 1:1 to teleconsultation or face to face consultation. The study was registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trial Register—REBEC, under the code RBR-8gpgyd. Study status is “Completed”.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>This study included 278 participants in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The median age was 61 (54–68) years, 167 (60%) were women. The between-groups comparative average reduction in HbA1c was −0.6% (90% CI −1.0; −0.1) at 3-months and −0.5% (90% CI −0.9; 0.0) at 6-months in Modified Intention-to-Treat (mITT) population with imputed data, showing the non-inferiority of teleconsultation. Results with no missing data imputation and in the per protocol population were similar. The frequency of hypoglycaemia and other adverse events was well balanced between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The results underscore the transformative potential of telemedicine in addressing the complexities of diabetes management within the framework of a universal healthcare system, contributing with valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and practitioners seeking innovative solutions to tackle the growing diabetes epidemic.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was funded by the <span>Brazilian Ministry of Health</span>, through the <span>Unified Health System</span>–<span>Institutional Development Support Program</span> (PROADI-SUS).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究针对 2 型糖尿病日益加重的负担,探讨了远程会诊作为糖尿病管理替代方法的潜力。研究的主要目的是验证一个假设,即对于从初级医疗机构转诊到统一卫生系统内专科医疗机构的 2 型糖尿病患者,在以糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1c) 为指标的血糖控制方面,远程会诊并不优于面对面会诊(两组间 HbA1c 差异的置信区间上限为 0.5%)。方法TELECONSULTA 是一项随机、务实、第 2 阶段、单中心、开放标签、非劣效试验,在巴西儒安维尔进行。共有 278 名确诊为 2 型糖尿病的患者通过初级保健医疗单位的强制性远程咨询服务接受了随机治疗。远程会诊或面对面会诊的随机分配比例为 1:1。该研究已在巴西临床试验注册中心注册,代码为 RBR-8gpgyd。研究状态为 "已完成"。研究结果这项研究的意向治疗(ITT)分析包括 278 名参与者。中位年龄为 61(54-68)岁,167(60%)人为女性。在修正意向治疗(mITT)人群中,组间比较的 HbA1c 平均降幅在 3 个月时为 -0.6% (90% CI -1.0; -0.1),在 6 个月时为 -0.5% (90% CI -0.9; 0.0)。无缺失数据估算和按方案人群的结果相似。结果强调了远程医疗在全民医疗保健系统框架内解决糖尿病管理复杂问题的变革潜力,为医疗保健政策制定者和从业人员寻求创新解决方案以应对日益严重的糖尿病流行病提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teleconsultation on patients with type 2 diabetes in the Brazilian public health system: a randomised, pragmatic, open-label, phase 2, non-inferiority trial (TELECONSULTA diabetes trial)

Background

This study addresses the rising burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and explores the potential of teleconsultation, as an alternative for diabetes management. The primary objective was to test the hypothesis that teleconsultation is non-inferior to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control measured as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (non-inferiority margin for the upper confidence interval for the difference between groups of 0,5% in HbA1c) for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients referred from Primary Healthcare to Specialized Care within the SUS.

Methods

TELECONSULTA, is a randomized, pragmatic, phase 2, single-centre, open-label, non-inferiority trial conducted in Joinville, Brazil. A total of 278 participants diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were randomized through mandatory teleconsulting services from primary care health units. The randomization was 1:1 to teleconsultation or face to face consultation. The study was registered at the Brazilian Clinical Trial Register—REBEC, under the code RBR-8gpgyd. Study status is “Completed”.

Findings

This study included 278 participants in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The median age was 61 (54–68) years, 167 (60%) were women. The between-groups comparative average reduction in HbA1c was −0.6% (90% CI −1.0; −0.1) at 3-months and −0.5% (90% CI −0.9; 0.0) at 6-months in Modified Intention-to-Treat (mITT) population with imputed data, showing the non-inferiority of teleconsultation. Results with no missing data imputation and in the per protocol population were similar. The frequency of hypoglycaemia and other adverse events was well balanced between groups.

Interpretation

The results underscore the transformative potential of telemedicine in addressing the complexities of diabetes management within the framework of a universal healthcare system, contributing with valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and practitioners seeking innovative solutions to tackle the growing diabetes epidemic.

Funding

This study was funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, through the Unified Health SystemInstitutional Development Support Program (PROADI-SUS).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
期刊最新文献
HIVR4P conference 2024 Leticia de Oliveira — a voice against gender-biased research opportunities Brazil's tax exemption on ultra-processed foods: a public health setback Opportunities for tuberculosis elimination in the Canadian Arctic: cost-effectiveness of community-wide screening in a remote Arctic community Active shooters and gun-free zones: emotional versus legal motivations – author's reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1