两种智能手机倾角计应用程序在三种不同体位下测量背侧驼背的可靠性

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.001
Guillermo de la Encarnación Simarro, Ignacio Martínez González-Moro
{"title":"两种智能手机倾角计应用程序在三种不同体位下测量背侧驼背的可靠性","authors":"Guillermo de la Encarnación Simarro,&nbsp;Ignacio Martínez González-Moro","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The exploration of the spine in the sagittal plane is of great relevance in the health area. The inclinometer has proved to be reliable in the assessment of this sagittal plane. Due to the growth of technology, a number of smartphone apps which simulates the action of the inclinometer have been developed.</div><div>Objectives: to analyze the reliability of two Smartphone Inclinometer Apps in the assessment of the dorsal kyphosis of the spine in three different positions when comparing it to a traditional inclinometer and determine if there are differences according to gender.</div><div>Design: observational, cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>25 healthy voluntaries were included. A traditional inclinometer and two smartphone apps, Clinometer® and Rotating Sphere Inclinometer® were used. Dorsal kyphosis was measured in three different positions: relaxed standing, relaxing seated position and standing anterior flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>no statistical differences were found between the measurements, and an excellent correlation was obtained comparing the tree devices, observing no differences according to gender</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The two apps are reliable and comparable to a traditional inclinometer as measuring sagittal curves of the spine. Besides, no variations in reliability according to sex were observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of two smartphone inclinometer apps in the measurement of dorsal kyphosis in three different positions\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo de la Encarnación Simarro,&nbsp;Ignacio Martínez González-Moro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The exploration of the spine in the sagittal plane is of great relevance in the health area. The inclinometer has proved to be reliable in the assessment of this sagittal plane. Due to the growth of technology, a number of smartphone apps which simulates the action of the inclinometer have been developed.</div><div>Objectives: to analyze the reliability of two Smartphone Inclinometer Apps in the assessment of the dorsal kyphosis of the spine in three different positions when comparing it to a traditional inclinometer and determine if there are differences according to gender.</div><div>Design: observational, cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>25 healthy voluntaries were included. A traditional inclinometer and two smartphone apps, Clinometer® and Rotating Sphere Inclinometer® were used. Dorsal kyphosis was measured in three different positions: relaxed standing, relaxing seated position and standing anterior flexion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>no statistical differences were found between the measurements, and an excellent correlation was obtained comparing the tree devices, observing no differences according to gender</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The two apps are reliable and comparable to a traditional inclinometer as measuring sagittal curves of the spine. Besides, no variations in reliability according to sex were observed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922400425X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922400425X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对脊柱矢状面的检测在健康领域具有重要意义。事实证明,倾角仪在评估矢状面方面是可靠的。目的:分析两款智能手机倾角仪应用程序与传统倾角仪相比,在三种不同体位下评估脊柱背侧畸形的可靠性,并确定是否存在性别差异。使用传统倾角仪和两款智能手机应用程序 Clinometer® 和 Rotating Sphere Inclinometer®。结论 这两款应用程序在测量脊柱矢状曲线方面非常可靠,与传统的倾角仪不相上下。此外,在可靠性方面也没有发现性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of two smartphone inclinometer apps in the measurement of dorsal kyphosis in three different positions

Background

The exploration of the spine in the sagittal plane is of great relevance in the health area. The inclinometer has proved to be reliable in the assessment of this sagittal plane. Due to the growth of technology, a number of smartphone apps which simulates the action of the inclinometer have been developed.
Objectives: to analyze the reliability of two Smartphone Inclinometer Apps in the assessment of the dorsal kyphosis of the spine in three different positions when comparing it to a traditional inclinometer and determine if there are differences according to gender.
Design: observational, cross-sectional study.

Methods

25 healthy voluntaries were included. A traditional inclinometer and two smartphone apps, Clinometer® and Rotating Sphere Inclinometer® were used. Dorsal kyphosis was measured in three different positions: relaxed standing, relaxing seated position and standing anterior flexion.

Results

no statistical differences were found between the measurements, and an excellent correlation was obtained comparing the tree devices, observing no differences according to gender

Conclusion

The two apps are reliable and comparable to a traditional inclinometer as measuring sagittal curves of the spine. Besides, no variations in reliability according to sex were observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1