重新审视经济不平等与政治暴力之间的联系:社会动员的作用

IF 5.4 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106820
Patricia Justino
{"title":"重新审视经济不平等与政治暴力之间的联系:社会动员的作用","authors":"Patricia Justino","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper revisits the age-old question of <em>how</em> economic inequalities may affect the emergence of political violence. Recent findings from three distinct bodies of literature suggest that this relationship is shaped by the forms of social mobilization inequalities (may) generate. The paper reviews this new evidence and outlines two conditions under which social mobilization in unequal societies may result in either non-violent or violent collective action and, ultimately, in violent conflict. The first condition is the level of social cooperation between different social groups that are formed during the process of social mobilization. The second is the efficacy of collective action to drive change, which is in turn shaped by the ability of individuals within groups to coordinate their actions. Forms of social mobilization become violent when antagonism is the dominant form of social interaction between different social groups in unequal societies <em>and</em> when each of these social groups exhibits high levels of internal coordination. This framework raises new research questions and policy implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 106820"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the links between economic inequality and political violence: The role of social mobilization\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Justino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper revisits the age-old question of <em>how</em> economic inequalities may affect the emergence of political violence. Recent findings from three distinct bodies of literature suggest that this relationship is shaped by the forms of social mobilization inequalities (may) generate. The paper reviews this new evidence and outlines two conditions under which social mobilization in unequal societies may result in either non-violent or violent collective action and, ultimately, in violent conflict. The first condition is the level of social cooperation between different social groups that are formed during the process of social mobilization. The second is the efficacy of collective action to drive change, which is in turn shaped by the ability of individuals within groups to coordinate their actions. Forms of social mobilization become violent when antagonism is the dominant form of social interaction between different social groups in unequal societies <em>and</em> when each of these social groups exhibits high levels of internal coordination. This framework raises new research questions and policy implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Development\",\"volume\":\"185 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106820\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24002900\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24002900","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重新探讨了经济不平等如何影响政治暴力的出现这一古老的问题。三组不同文献的最新研究结果表明,这种关系是由不平等(可能)产生的社会动员形式决定的。本文回顾了这些新证据,并概述了不平等社会中社会动员可能导致非暴力或暴力集体行动,并最终导致暴力冲突的两个条件。第一个条件是在社会动员过程中形成的不同社会群体之间的社会合作程度。第二个条件是集体行动推动变革的效率,而这又取决于群体中个人协调行动的能力。当对立成为不平等社会中不同社会群体之间社会互动的主要形式时,当每个社会群体都表现出高度的内部协调时,社会动员的形式就会变得暴力。这一框架提出了新的研究问题和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting the links between economic inequality and political violence: The role of social mobilization
This paper revisits the age-old question of how economic inequalities may affect the emergence of political violence. Recent findings from three distinct bodies of literature suggest that this relationship is shaped by the forms of social mobilization inequalities (may) generate. The paper reviews this new evidence and outlines two conditions under which social mobilization in unequal societies may result in either non-violent or violent collective action and, ultimately, in violent conflict. The first condition is the level of social cooperation between different social groups that are formed during the process of social mobilization. The second is the efficacy of collective action to drive change, which is in turn shaped by the ability of individuals within groups to coordinate their actions. Forms of social mobilization become violent when antagonism is the dominant form of social interaction between different social groups in unequal societies and when each of these social groups exhibits high levels of internal coordination. This framework raises new research questions and policy implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
期刊最新文献
Shine a (night)light: Decentralization and economic development in Burkina Faso A critical review of the state-of-the-art on social policy, conflict and peace in the Middle East and North Africa region: Why social policy matters for peace and why it is also not enough How wartime recruitment affects political engagement among civilians: Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire To use financial incentives or not? Insights from experiments in encouraging sanitation investments in four countries Do conditional cash transfers improve intergenerational gains in educational achievement?: Evidence from Brazil’s Bolsa Familia Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1