解读创新研究中通用技术发展的知识结构和演变趋势

IF 12.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123840
Yanan Xu, Yaowu Sun, Yiting Zhou
{"title":"解读创新研究中通用技术发展的知识结构和演变趋势","authors":"Yanan Xu,&nbsp;Yaowu Sun,&nbsp;Yiting Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>General-purpose technologies (GPTs) are crucial for advancing long-term economic growth. Previous research on GPTs has primarily focused on economics. However, in the innovation field, firms face greater challenges in appropriability and value creation due to GPTs' externalities. Research on GPTs in this flexible field may exhibit unique characteristics. Despite growing academic interest, related research remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive theoretical system. Traditional literature reviews and bibliometric analyses often focus on the most cited articles, leading to citation biases and an emphasis on impact over theme discovery. Combining topic modeling with manual coding allows for the iteration of existing theories and the creation of new theoretical frameworks. Our study analyzed 532 articles on GPTs in the innovation field, identifying 11 topics using the LDA topic model. Through manual coding and the PyLDAvis visualization tool, we identified four research areas: jungle of GPTs, profiting from GPTs innovation, industrial convergence, and economic growth and wage inequality. We examined the evolutionary trajectory, and theoretical architecture of GPTs research, proposing a comprehensive framework. We urge scholars to extend GPTs research from the firm to the ecosystem level, consider the standardization and evolution of next-generation GPTs, and diversify research methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 123840"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking the intellectual structure and evolution trend of general-purpose technologies development in innovation studies\",\"authors\":\"Yanan Xu,&nbsp;Yaowu Sun,&nbsp;Yiting Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>General-purpose technologies (GPTs) are crucial for advancing long-term economic growth. Previous research on GPTs has primarily focused on economics. However, in the innovation field, firms face greater challenges in appropriability and value creation due to GPTs' externalities. Research on GPTs in this flexible field may exhibit unique characteristics. Despite growing academic interest, related research remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive theoretical system. Traditional literature reviews and bibliometric analyses often focus on the most cited articles, leading to citation biases and an emphasis on impact over theme discovery. Combining topic modeling with manual coding allows for the iteration of existing theories and the creation of new theoretical frameworks. Our study analyzed 532 articles on GPTs in the innovation field, identifying 11 topics using the LDA topic model. Through manual coding and the PyLDAvis visualization tool, we identified four research areas: jungle of GPTs, profiting from GPTs innovation, industrial convergence, and economic growth and wage inequality. We examined the evolutionary trajectory, and theoretical architecture of GPTs research, proposing a comprehensive framework. We urge scholars to extend GPTs research from the firm to the ecosystem level, consider the standardization and evolution of next-generation GPTs, and diversify research methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technological Forecasting and Social Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006383\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524006383","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通用技术(GPT)对于推动长期经济增长至关重要。以往对通用技术的研究主要集中在经济学方面。然而,在创新领域,由于 GPT 的外部性,企业在可挪用性和价值创造方面面临着更大的挑战。在这一灵活领域对 GPT 的研究可能会呈现出独特的特点。尽管学术界的兴趣与日俱增,但相关研究仍然支离破碎,缺乏全面的理论体系。传统的文献综述和文献计量分析往往侧重于被引用次数最多的文章,从而导致引文偏差和重影响轻主题发现。将主题建模与手动编码相结合,可以迭代现有理论并创建新的理论框架。我们的研究分析了 532 篇关于创新领域 GPT 的文章,利用 LDA 主题模型确定了 11 个主题。通过手动编码和 PyLDAvis 可视化工具,我们确定了四个研究领域:GPT 的丛林、从 GPT 创新中获利、产业融合以及经济增长与工资不平等。我们考察了 GPTs 研究的演变轨迹和理论架构,提出了一个综合框架。我们呼吁学者们将 GPTs 研究从企业层面扩展到生态系统层面,考虑下一代 GPTs 的标准化和演化,并使研究方法多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unpacking the intellectual structure and evolution trend of general-purpose technologies development in innovation studies
General-purpose technologies (GPTs) are crucial for advancing long-term economic growth. Previous research on GPTs has primarily focused on economics. However, in the innovation field, firms face greater challenges in appropriability and value creation due to GPTs' externalities. Research on GPTs in this flexible field may exhibit unique characteristics. Despite growing academic interest, related research remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive theoretical system. Traditional literature reviews and bibliometric analyses often focus on the most cited articles, leading to citation biases and an emphasis on impact over theme discovery. Combining topic modeling with manual coding allows for the iteration of existing theories and the creation of new theoretical frameworks. Our study analyzed 532 articles on GPTs in the innovation field, identifying 11 topics using the LDA topic model. Through manual coding and the PyLDAvis visualization tool, we identified four research areas: jungle of GPTs, profiting from GPTs innovation, industrial convergence, and economic growth and wage inequality. We examined the evolutionary trajectory, and theoretical architecture of GPTs research, proposing a comprehensive framework. We urge scholars to extend GPTs research from the firm to the ecosystem level, consider the standardization and evolution of next-generation GPTs, and diversify research methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
Roles of related and unrelated external technologies in shaping regional breakthrough technological advantages Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty? Understanding service robot adoption and resistance from a service provider perspective Examining trust in cryptocurrency investment: Insights from the structural equation modeling Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1