当代辅助交通研究的前景:对美国和加拿大文献的批判性系统回顾

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100930
Theodore Collins , Léa Ravensbergen , Mischa Young
{"title":"当代辅助交通研究的前景:对美国和加拿大文献的批判性系统回顾","authors":"Theodore Collins ,&nbsp;Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Mischa Young","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the United States (US) and Canada, paratransit refers to transportation services that supplement scheduled, fixed route, mass transit to eligible passengers, namely people with disabilities and a growing number of older adults. This paper presents a critical systematic review of the literature on paratransit in the US and Canada since 2010 (n = 57), investigating what is known about paratransit, as well as the methodological and conceptual approaches privileged in this literature. Three separate approaches to the study of paratransit were identified. The first approach is paratransit modeling (n = 22). Under this approach, papers focus on demand modeling and route optimization (n = 12), cost optimization (n = 6), or quality of service and system information management (n = 4). Papers under the second approach, alternatives (n = 15), all propose different ways to provide paratransit services, including public–private partnerships (n = 6), autonomous vehicle technologies (n = 5), and the diversion of current paratransit user toward other modes (n = 4). Thirdly, many papers examine current services (n = 20), relating to system performance (n = 9), operational considerations (n = 7), or user perspectives (n = 4). When combined with a strong bias toward quantitative studies (77%) the perspectives of paratransit users are under-represented in the literature, over-shadowed by a focus on cost-cutting and improving operational efficiency. These trends are discussed in relation to neoliberalism and Critical Ableist Studies. Future research should directly involve paratransit users, engage in theory, and embrace qualitative methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The landscape of contemporary paratransit research: A critical systematic review of the literature in the US and Canada\",\"authors\":\"Theodore Collins ,&nbsp;Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Mischa Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the United States (US) and Canada, paratransit refers to transportation services that supplement scheduled, fixed route, mass transit to eligible passengers, namely people with disabilities and a growing number of older adults. This paper presents a critical systematic review of the literature on paratransit in the US and Canada since 2010 (n = 57), investigating what is known about paratransit, as well as the methodological and conceptual approaches privileged in this literature. Three separate approaches to the study of paratransit were identified. The first approach is paratransit modeling (n = 22). Under this approach, papers focus on demand modeling and route optimization (n = 12), cost optimization (n = 6), or quality of service and system information management (n = 4). Papers under the second approach, alternatives (n = 15), all propose different ways to provide paratransit services, including public–private partnerships (n = 6), autonomous vehicle technologies (n = 5), and the diversion of current paratransit user toward other modes (n = 4). Thirdly, many papers examine current services (n = 20), relating to system performance (n = 9), operational considerations (n = 7), or user perspectives (n = 4). When combined with a strong bias toward quantitative studies (77%) the perspectives of paratransit users are under-represented in the literature, over-shadowed by a focus on cost-cutting and improving operational efficiency. These trends are discussed in relation to neoliberalism and Critical Ableist Studies. Future research should directly involve paratransit users, engage in theory, and embrace qualitative methods.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24001935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国和加拿大,准公共交通是指为符合条件的乘客(即残疾人和越来越多的老年人)提供的补充固定路线公共交通的交通服务。本文对 2010 年以来美国和加拿大有关准公共交通的文献(n = 57)进行了批判性的系统回顾,调查了人们对准公共交通的了解程度,以及这些文献中所采用的方法和概念。对准公共交通的研究确定了三种不同的方法。第一种方法是建立准公共交通模型(n = 22)。在这种方法下,论文的重点是需求建模和线路优化(12 篇)、成本优化(6 篇)或服务质量和系统信息管理(4 篇)。第二种方法下的论文,即替代方案(n = 15),都提出了提供辅助公交服务的不同方法,包括公私合作伙伴关系(n = 6)、自动驾驶车辆技术(n = 5),以及将目前的辅助公交用户转向其他模式(n = 4)。第三,许多论文研究了当前的服务(20 篇),涉及系统性能(9 篇)、运营考虑(7 篇)或用户观点(4 篇)。再加上对定量研究的强烈偏好(77%),辅助公交用户的观点在文献中的代表性不足,被对削减成本和提高运营效率的关注所掩盖。这些趋势与新自由主义和批判能力主义研究有关。未来的研究应直接让辅助公交用户参与进来,采用理论和定性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The landscape of contemporary paratransit research: A critical systematic review of the literature in the US and Canada
In the United States (US) and Canada, paratransit refers to transportation services that supplement scheduled, fixed route, mass transit to eligible passengers, namely people with disabilities and a growing number of older adults. This paper presents a critical systematic review of the literature on paratransit in the US and Canada since 2010 (n = 57), investigating what is known about paratransit, as well as the methodological and conceptual approaches privileged in this literature. Three separate approaches to the study of paratransit were identified. The first approach is paratransit modeling (n = 22). Under this approach, papers focus on demand modeling and route optimization (n = 12), cost optimization (n = 6), or quality of service and system information management (n = 4). Papers under the second approach, alternatives (n = 15), all propose different ways to provide paratransit services, including public–private partnerships (n = 6), autonomous vehicle technologies (n = 5), and the diversion of current paratransit user toward other modes (n = 4). Thirdly, many papers examine current services (n = 20), relating to system performance (n = 9), operational considerations (n = 7), or user perspectives (n = 4). When combined with a strong bias toward quantitative studies (77%) the perspectives of paratransit users are under-represented in the literature, over-shadowed by a focus on cost-cutting and improving operational efficiency. These trends are discussed in relation to neoliberalism and Critical Ableist Studies. Future research should directly involve paratransit users, engage in theory, and embrace qualitative methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Analysing driver behaviour and crash frequency at railway level crossings using connected vehicle and GIS data An injury severity-based methodology for assessing priority areas for shared micromobility accident risk mitigation Improving conventional transit services with modular autonomous vehicles: A bi-level programming approach Does car dependence make people unsatisfied with Life? Evidence from a U.S. National survey Ownership and use of electric vehicles in the Washington, DC, metro area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1