应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策:另一种 "资源诅咒"?

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114374
Stella Tsani , Wee Chian Koh
{"title":"应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策:另一种 \"资源诅咒\"?","authors":"Stella Tsani ,&nbsp;Wee Chian Koh","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines the COVID-19 policy responses with focus on resource abundance and the role of policy tools, like oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds, employed in resource-rich countries to support fiscal responses to the pandemic. Panel data on a sample of 217 countries for the period 2019–2020 are used. Quantile regression analysis is employed to obtain a nuanced understanding of the identified relationships which goes beyond mean links. Empirical results show that resource-rich countries, and hydrocarbon rich-countries in particular, record smaller fiscal responses to the pandemic as compared to resource-poor countries. This holds true even for countries that operate Sovereign Wealth Funds. Results are consistent under different model specifications, policy response measures (fiscal, on-budget), resource-abundance variables, whole- and sub-sample, at the mean and different quantile levels. The findings confirm another case of the “resource curse” manifested through weaker fiscal stimulus in resource-rich countries as compared to resource-poor countries. This calls for policy considerations in resource-rich countries to better prepare against future shocks and to carefully consider in this process the role of explicit policy tools they may employ.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 114374"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Another case of “resource curse”?\",\"authors\":\"Stella Tsani ,&nbsp;Wee Chian Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper examines the COVID-19 policy responses with focus on resource abundance and the role of policy tools, like oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds, employed in resource-rich countries to support fiscal responses to the pandemic. Panel data on a sample of 217 countries for the period 2019–2020 are used. Quantile regression analysis is employed to obtain a nuanced understanding of the identified relationships which goes beyond mean links. Empirical results show that resource-rich countries, and hydrocarbon rich-countries in particular, record smaller fiscal responses to the pandemic as compared to resource-poor countries. This holds true even for countries that operate Sovereign Wealth Funds. Results are consistent under different model specifications, policy response measures (fiscal, on-budget), resource-abundance variables, whole- and sub-sample, at the mean and different quantile levels. The findings confirm another case of the “resource curse” manifested through weaker fiscal stimulus in resource-rich countries as compared to resource-poor countries. This calls for policy considerations in resource-rich countries to better prepare against future shocks and to carefully consider in this process the role of explicit policy tools they may employ.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400394X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142152400394X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了 COVID-19 的政策应对措施,重点关注资源丰富程度以及资源丰富国家为支持大流行病财政应对措施而采用的政策工具(如基于石油的主权财富基金)的作用。本文使用了 2019-2020 年期间 217 个样本国家的面板数据。采用了量子回归分析,以获得对已识别关系的细微理解,这种理解超越了均值联系。实证结果表明,与资源贫乏的国家相比,资源丰富的国家,尤其是油气资源丰富的国家,对大流行病的财政反应较小。即使是那些拥有主权财富基金的国家也是如此。在不同的模型规格、政策应对措施(财政、预算)、资源丰富程度变量、全样本和子样本、均值和不同的量级水平下,结果都是一致的。研究结果证实了 "资源诅咒 "的另一种表现形式,即与资源贫乏国家相比,资源丰富国家的财政刺激力度较弱。这就要求资源丰富的国家进行政策考虑,以更好地应对未来的冲击,并在这一过程中认真考虑其可能采用的明确政策工具的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: Another case of “resource curse”?
This paper examines the COVID-19 policy responses with focus on resource abundance and the role of policy tools, like oil-based Sovereign Wealth Funds, employed in resource-rich countries to support fiscal responses to the pandemic. Panel data on a sample of 217 countries for the period 2019–2020 are used. Quantile regression analysis is employed to obtain a nuanced understanding of the identified relationships which goes beyond mean links. Empirical results show that resource-rich countries, and hydrocarbon rich-countries in particular, record smaller fiscal responses to the pandemic as compared to resource-poor countries. This holds true even for countries that operate Sovereign Wealth Funds. Results are consistent under different model specifications, policy response measures (fiscal, on-budget), resource-abundance variables, whole- and sub-sample, at the mean and different quantile levels. The findings confirm another case of the “resource curse” manifested through weaker fiscal stimulus in resource-rich countries as compared to resource-poor countries. This calls for policy considerations in resource-rich countries to better prepare against future shocks and to carefully consider in this process the role of explicit policy tools they may employ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Policy implications of implementing residential PV solar energy systems in developing regions A multi-phase qualitative study on consumers’ barriers and drivers of electric vehicle use in India: Policy implications The impact of digital economy on energy rebound effect in China: A stochastic energy demand frontier approach Editorial Board The value of decentral flexibility in nodal market design – A case study for Europe 2030
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1