燃煤发电厂的福利影响:经济效益能否补偿健康成本?

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Economic Analysis and Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.030
Tao Lin , Minhao Qi , Sijie Wei , Zhao Chen
{"title":"燃煤发电厂的福利影响:经济效益能否补偿健康成本?","authors":"Tao Lin ,&nbsp;Minhao Qi ,&nbsp;Sijie Wei ,&nbsp;Zhao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of electricity generation worldwide, particularly in developing countries. While much research highlights their negative health externalities, few studies assess the comprehensive welfare effects, including potential economic benefits. Using data on the geographic distribution of coal-fired power plants and individual survey data from China (1989–2015), we assess whether the economic benefits of these plants outweigh their health costs. Our empirical analysis compares health and employment outcomes of individuals living near a plant to those slightly farther away, before and after the plant's opening. We find that coal-fired power plants significantly harm local residents' health while simultaneously boosting employment opportunities. Mechanism analysis shows that pollution drives health deterioration, while higher electricity production leads to increased labor demand. These impacts are unevenly distributed across education, age, and regional groups, with pronounced inequalities. A welfare analysis indicates that the overall effect of coal-fired power plants is negative, as the health costs surpass the economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 1144-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welfare impacts of coal-fired power plants: Do economic benefits compensate health costs?\",\"authors\":\"Tao Lin ,&nbsp;Minhao Qi ,&nbsp;Sijie Wei ,&nbsp;Zhao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of electricity generation worldwide, particularly in developing countries. While much research highlights their negative health externalities, few studies assess the comprehensive welfare effects, including potential economic benefits. Using data on the geographic distribution of coal-fired power plants and individual survey data from China (1989–2015), we assess whether the economic benefits of these plants outweigh their health costs. Our empirical analysis compares health and employment outcomes of individuals living near a plant to those slightly farther away, before and after the plant's opening. We find that coal-fired power plants significantly harm local residents' health while simultaneously boosting employment opportunities. Mechanism analysis shows that pollution drives health deterioration, while higher electricity production leads to increased labor demand. These impacts are unevenly distributed across education, age, and regional groups, with pronounced inequalities. A welfare analysis indicates that the overall effect of coal-fired power plants is negative, as the health costs surpass the economic benefits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1144-1163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002856\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592624002856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

燃煤发电厂是全球最大的发电来源,尤其是在发展中国家。尽管许多研究强调了燃煤发电厂对健康造成的负面外部效应,但很少有研究评估其综合福利效应,包括潜在的经济效益。利用中国燃煤电厂地理分布数据和个人调查数据(1989-2015 年),我们评估了这些电厂的经济效益是否超过其健康成本。我们的实证分析比较了生活在电厂附近和稍远地区的个人在电厂启用前后的健康和就业结果。我们发现,燃煤电厂在显著损害当地居民健康的同时,也增加了就业机会。机制分析表明,污染导致健康恶化,而电力生产的增加则导致劳动力需求的增加。这些影响在不同教育、年龄和地区群体中分布不均,存在明显的不平等。福利分析表明,燃煤发电厂的总体影响是负面的,因为健康成本超过了经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Welfare impacts of coal-fired power plants: Do economic benefits compensate health costs?
Coal-fired power plants are the largest source of electricity generation worldwide, particularly in developing countries. While much research highlights their negative health externalities, few studies assess the comprehensive welfare effects, including potential economic benefits. Using data on the geographic distribution of coal-fired power plants and individual survey data from China (1989–2015), we assess whether the economic benefits of these plants outweigh their health costs. Our empirical analysis compares health and employment outcomes of individuals living near a plant to those slightly farther away, before and after the plant's opening. We find that coal-fired power plants significantly harm local residents' health while simultaneously boosting employment opportunities. Mechanism analysis shows that pollution drives health deterioration, while higher electricity production leads to increased labor demand. These impacts are unevenly distributed across education, age, and regional groups, with pronounced inequalities. A welfare analysis indicates that the overall effect of coal-fired power plants is negative, as the health costs surpass the economic benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
期刊最新文献
From restriction to relaxation: The impact of fertility policy on household savings across countries Issuance of urban investment bonds and high-quality urban economic development Beyond the ivory tower: Professors on the board and corporate performance in China Does the incentive policy for renewable energy grid connection affect the technical efficiency of power grid companies? Empirical analysis based on China and Japan Reformation of government officials’ performance evaluation and corporate environmental investment: The moderating effect of corporate bargaining power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1