黄土地区蝶形荷载下隧道破坏机理及预防措施研究

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Engineering Failure Analysis Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108972
Fei Zhou , Hongpeng Lai , Yuyang Liu , MingKun Zhao
{"title":"黄土地区蝶形荷载下隧道破坏机理及预防措施研究","authors":"Fei Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongpeng Lai ,&nbsp;Yuyang Liu ,&nbsp;MingKun Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess &gt; general loess &gt; clay loess.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the failure mechanisms and preventive actions of tunnels under butterfly load in loess regions\",\"authors\":\"Fei Zhou ,&nbsp;Hongpeng Lai ,&nbsp;Yuyang Liu ,&nbsp;MingKun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess &gt; general loess &gt; clay loess.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Failure Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Failure Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724010185\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724010185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多黄土隧道的围岩压力测量结果显示出一种蝶形分布模式,随后被称为 "蝶形荷载"。这种模式与中国现行隧道设计规范所计算的荷载分布和大小(即 "规范荷载")存在明显偏差。通过模型试验和数值模拟,研究了不同荷载分布下隧道结构的力学行为、破坏原因、破坏机理和预防措施。实验结果表明,隧道结构在蝶形荷载作用下的极限承载力明显低于规范荷载作用下的极限承载力,且极限承载力随荷载不均匀度的增加而减小。蝶形荷载增加了整个环形结构轴向力分布的不均匀性,也导致结构在拱顶和拱肩产生反向力矩。同样,从裂缝的形态特征来看,蝶形荷载对隧道拱顶和拱肩的影响最大。在蝶形荷载的影响下,衬砌结构容易在拱肩和拱脚位置产生裂缝,而拉伸裂缝则位于拱顶位置。针对隧道结构在蝶式荷载作用下的破坏机理,建议在隧道拱部采用超前小导管注浆,抑制地层错动,并在拱脚打根桩,提高隧道底部承载力。该技术在不同黄土地区的防治效果分别为砂质黄土、一般黄土、粘土黄土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research on the failure mechanisms and preventive actions of tunnels under butterfly load in loess regions
The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess > general loess > clay loess.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Failure Analysis
Engineering Failure Analysis 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
956
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies. Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials. Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged. Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Buckling and failure mechanisms of asymmetric composite sandwich panels subjected to shear loadings Editorial Board Research on TBM parameter optimization based on failure probability The impact of water contamination on the performance failure of lithium grease Corrosion fatigue analysis of suspenders on continuous suspension bridge under combined action of wind and traffic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1