Fei Zhou , Hongpeng Lai , Yuyang Liu , MingKun Zhao
{"title":"黄土地区蝶形荷载下隧道破坏机理及预防措施研究","authors":"Fei Zhou , Hongpeng Lai , Yuyang Liu , MingKun Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess > general loess > clay loess.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11677,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Failure Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the failure mechanisms and preventive actions of tunnels under butterfly load in loess regions\",\"authors\":\"Fei Zhou , Hongpeng Lai , Yuyang Liu , MingKun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess > general loess > clay loess.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Failure Analysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Failure Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724010185\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Failure Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630724010185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Research on the failure mechanisms and preventive actions of tunnels under butterfly load in loess regions
The results of surrounding rock pressure measurements from numerous loess tunnels exhibit a butterfly distribution pattern, subsequently referred to as ’butterfly load’. This pattern significantly deviates from the load distribution and magnitude—referred to as ’specification load’—calculated by current Chinese tunnel design specifications. By means of model experimental and numerical simulation, the mechanical behavior, failure cause, failure mechanism and preventive actions of tunnel structure under different load distribution are studied. The experimental results indicate that the ultimate bearing capacity of the tunnel structure under the butterfly load is significantly lower than that under the specification load, with the ultimate bearing capacity decreasing as load unevenness increases. The butterfly load increases the unevenness of the axial force distribution throughout the annular structure and also causes the structure to produce reverse moments in the vault and arch shoulder. Similarly, the morphological characteristics of the cracks show that the butterfly load most significantly influences the tunnel vault and arch shoulder. Under the influence of the butterfly load, the lining structure is prone to developing cracks at the arch shoulder and arch foot positions, with tensile cracks located at the vault position. Aiming at the failure mechanism of tunnel structure under butterfly load, it is suggested to implement advanced small conduit grouting at the tunnel arch to suppress the dislocation of the formation and to lay root piles at the arch foot to improve the bearing capacity of the tunnel bottom. The prevention effect of this technology in different loess regions is sandy loess > general loess > clay loess.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Failure Analysis publishes research papers describing the analysis of engineering failures and related studies.
Papers relating to the structure, properties and behaviour of engineering materials are encouraged, particularly those which also involve the detailed application of materials parameters to problems in engineering structures, components and design. In addition to the area of materials engineering, the interacting fields of mechanical, manufacturing, aeronautical, civil, chemical, corrosion and design engineering are considered relevant. Activity should be directed at analysing engineering failures and carrying out research to help reduce the incidences of failures and to extend the operating horizons of engineering materials.
Emphasis is placed on the mechanical properties of materials and their behaviour when influenced by structure, process and environment. Metallic, polymeric, ceramic and natural materials are all included and the application of these materials to real engineering situations should be emphasised. The use of a case-study based approach is also encouraged.
Engineering Failure Analysis provides essential reference material and critical feedback into the design process thereby contributing to the prevention of engineering failures in the future. All submissions will be subject to peer review from leading experts in the field.