电力市场制度中的风险谈判:从净零过渡自由化改革的历史中可以汲取哪些经验教训?

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103790
Ronan Bolton
{"title":"电力市场制度中的风险谈判:从净零过渡自由化改革的历史中可以汲取哪些经验教训?","authors":"Ronan Bolton","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper develops a historical account of the introduction of electricity markets and liberalisation reforms in Britain and Europe. Drawing on the field of ‘policy-orientated history’ in energy studies, cases are analysed with a view to informing contemporary debates about fundamental reforms to electricity markets for renewables integration into power systems. A dynamic approach to market reform is suggested which analyses change across different dimensions of ‘electricity market regimes’. These are the negotiated rules and regulations through which the risks and costs associated with electricity systems are allocated. Electricity market regimes are shaped by political choices around economic risks and their allocation between producers, consumers and broader society. Based on the framework and historical analysis, the paper offers an analytical approach for the study of contemporary reforms of electricity markets in the context of net zero transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103790"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negotiating risks in electricity market regimes: What lessons can be learned from the history of liberalisation reform for net zero transitions?\",\"authors\":\"Ronan Bolton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper develops a historical account of the introduction of electricity markets and liberalisation reforms in Britain and Europe. Drawing on the field of ‘policy-orientated history’ in energy studies, cases are analysed with a view to informing contemporary debates about fundamental reforms to electricity markets for renewables integration into power systems. A dynamic approach to market reform is suggested which analyses change across different dimensions of ‘electricity market regimes’. These are the negotiated rules and regulations through which the risks and costs associated with electricity systems are allocated. Electricity market regimes are shaped by political choices around economic risks and their allocation between producers, consumers and broader society. Based on the framework and historical analysis, the paper offers an analytical approach for the study of contemporary reforms of electricity markets in the context of net zero transitions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103790\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003815\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003815","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从历史角度阐述了英国和欧洲电力市场的引入和自由化改革。本文借鉴能源研究中的 "政策导向史 "领域,对案例进行了分析,以期为当代有关电力市场根本性改革的讨论提供信息,从而将可再生能源纳入电力系统。建议采用一种动态的市场改革方法,分析 "电力市场制度 "不同层面的变化。这些都是经过协商的规则和条例,通过这些规则和条例分配与电力系统相关的风险和成本。电力市场制度是由围绕经济风险及其在生产者、消费者和更广泛的社会之间的分配所做出的政治选择形成的。基于该框架和历史分析,本文为研究净零过渡背景下的当代电力市场改革提供了一种分析方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Negotiating risks in electricity market regimes: What lessons can be learned from the history of liberalisation reform for net zero transitions?
This paper develops a historical account of the introduction of electricity markets and liberalisation reforms in Britain and Europe. Drawing on the field of ‘policy-orientated history’ in energy studies, cases are analysed with a view to informing contemporary debates about fundamental reforms to electricity markets for renewables integration into power systems. A dynamic approach to market reform is suggested which analyses change across different dimensions of ‘electricity market regimes’. These are the negotiated rules and regulations through which the risks and costs associated with electricity systems are allocated. Electricity market regimes are shaped by political choices around economic risks and their allocation between producers, consumers and broader society. Based on the framework and historical analysis, the paper offers an analytical approach for the study of contemporary reforms of electricity markets in the context of net zero transitions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Energy communities, distributed generation, renewable sources: Close relatives or potential friends? Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ Connected, complex, and carbonized: The country archetypes of the petrochemicals sector Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany Energy subsidies versus cash transfers: the causal effect of misperceptions on public support for countermeasures during the energy crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1