不同种族间的互动、公园所有权、归属感、社区资产以及对提供文化生态系统服务的认识

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Urban Forestry & Urban Greening Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128551
Lauren E. Mullenbach , Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis , Emily Piontek
{"title":"不同种族间的互动、公园所有权、归属感、社区资产以及对提供文化生态系统服务的认识","authors":"Lauren E. Mullenbach ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis ,&nbsp;Emily Piontek","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public urban parks contribute fundamentally to social and ecological functioning of modern cities, and enhance human wellbeing through associated ecosystem services, including cultural ecosystem services (CES). This study was conducted to understand how components of interactional justice contribute to users’ perceptions of how well CES are provided in public parks. This paper therefore explores the possibility of parks’ contribution to sense of ownership and belonging, and their place as community assets, as potential catalysts for CES. Data came from an online survey distributed to adult residents of St. Louis, Missouri, USA in spring-summer of 2019. Black respondents reported more <em>positive park interactions</em> than white respondents. <em>Positive interactions</em> in parks were positively related to all dependent variables, while <em>negative interactions</em> were negatively related to <em>belonging</em> and <em>community asset</em>, but positively related to <em>perceived provision of CES</em>. Only <em>community asset</em> was positively related to <em>perceived provision of CES</em>. Results suggest that residents perceive the provision of CES differently based on the quality of interactions with others in their community parks. Additionally, feeling that the park is a community asset contributed positively to users’ perceptions of CES associated with it. This finding indicates that the social and cultural components of a community park relate to how well that space is perceived to deliver cultural environmental benefits. As these interactions influence relationships to and use of the park itself, it is implied that interactional justice plays an important role in determining how effective urban parks are in delivering CES.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 128551"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interracial interaction, park ownership, belonging, community asset, and perceived provision of cultural ecosystem services\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Mullenbach ,&nbsp;Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis ,&nbsp;Emily Piontek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Public urban parks contribute fundamentally to social and ecological functioning of modern cities, and enhance human wellbeing through associated ecosystem services, including cultural ecosystem services (CES). This study was conducted to understand how components of interactional justice contribute to users’ perceptions of how well CES are provided in public parks. This paper therefore explores the possibility of parks’ contribution to sense of ownership and belonging, and their place as community assets, as potential catalysts for CES. Data came from an online survey distributed to adult residents of St. Louis, Missouri, USA in spring-summer of 2019. Black respondents reported more <em>positive park interactions</em> than white respondents. <em>Positive interactions</em> in parks were positively related to all dependent variables, while <em>negative interactions</em> were negatively related to <em>belonging</em> and <em>community asset</em>, but positively related to <em>perceived provision of CES</em>. Only <em>community asset</em> was positively related to <em>perceived provision of CES</em>. Results suggest that residents perceive the provision of CES differently based on the quality of interactions with others in their community parks. Additionally, feeling that the park is a community asset contributed positively to users’ perceptions of CES associated with it. This finding indicates that the social and cultural components of a community park relate to how well that space is perceived to deliver cultural environmental benefits. As these interactions influence relationships to and use of the park itself, it is implied that interactional justice plays an important role in determining how effective urban parks are in delivering CES.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 128551\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003492\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866724003492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市公共公园从根本上促进了现代城市的社会和生态功能,并通过相关的生态系统服务(包括文化生态系统服务 (CES))提高了人类的福祉。本研究旨在了解互动公正的组成部分如何影响用户对公共公园提供的文化生态系统服务的看法。因此,本文探讨了公园对所有权和归属感的贡献及其作为社区资产的地位作为 CES 潜在催化剂的可能性。数据来自 2019 年春夏对美国密苏里州圣路易斯市成年居民进行的在线调查。与白人受访者相比,黑人受访者报告了更多积极的公园互动。公园中的积极互动与所有因变量均呈正相关,而消极互动则与归属感和社区资产呈负相关,但与感知到的 CES 提供呈正相关。只有社区资产与感知到的 CES 提供情况呈正相关。研究结果表明,根据居民在社区公园中与他人互动的质量,他们对提供社区服务的感知有所不同。此外,认为公园是社区资产也会对用户感知到的相关社区服务产生积极影响。这一研究结果表明,社区公园的社会和文化因素与人们对该公园提供文化环境效益的看法有关。由于这些互动会影响与公园本身的关系以及对公园本身的使用,这就意味着互动公正在决定城市公园在提供社区环境利益方面的有效性方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interracial interaction, park ownership, belonging, community asset, and perceived provision of cultural ecosystem services
Public urban parks contribute fundamentally to social and ecological functioning of modern cities, and enhance human wellbeing through associated ecosystem services, including cultural ecosystem services (CES). This study was conducted to understand how components of interactional justice contribute to users’ perceptions of how well CES are provided in public parks. This paper therefore explores the possibility of parks’ contribution to sense of ownership and belonging, and their place as community assets, as potential catalysts for CES. Data came from an online survey distributed to adult residents of St. Louis, Missouri, USA in spring-summer of 2019. Black respondents reported more positive park interactions than white respondents. Positive interactions in parks were positively related to all dependent variables, while negative interactions were negatively related to belonging and community asset, but positively related to perceived provision of CES. Only community asset was positively related to perceived provision of CES. Results suggest that residents perceive the provision of CES differently based on the quality of interactions with others in their community parks. Additionally, feeling that the park is a community asset contributed positively to users’ perceptions of CES associated with it. This finding indicates that the social and cultural components of a community park relate to how well that space is perceived to deliver cultural environmental benefits. As these interactions influence relationships to and use of the park itself, it is implied that interactional justice plays an important role in determining how effective urban parks are in delivering CES.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
期刊最新文献
Energy performance assessment on vertical greening systems with green roof in hot summer and cold winter regions based on long-term experimental data The role of urban trees as nature-based solutions for stormwater runoff control Urbanization associated with greater tree growth declines in urban than in rural forests Cross-climatic comparison of microbial stress-responsive genes in urban parks: A comparative analysis Evidence for environmental influences on impulsivity and aggression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1