使用随机森林算法对西非加纳半干旱热带稀树草原单日期和多日期陆地卫星图像分类进行评估

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02434
Eric Adjei Lawer
{"title":"使用随机森林算法对西非加纳半干旱热带稀树草原单日期和多日期陆地卫星图像分类进行评估","authors":"Eric Adjei Lawer","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate detection and quantification of land use and land cover (LULC) change is critical for understanding landscape patterns in heterogeneous semi-arid environments. This study investigates the performance of single-date and multi-date Landsat images as well as the relationship between different LULC schemes (simple [2 and 4 classes] and complex [6 and 9 classes]) and the resulting classification accuracy. Specifically, the random forest algorithm was applied to Landsat data comprised of different combinations of image dates (single-date and multi-date) captured in June, October, and December for multiple levels of LULC (scheme) mapping and accuracy evaluations due to its high performance when dealing with large data and heterogeneous landscapes. Results indicated that multi-date images consistently produced higher classification accuracies than single-date images. Significant negative correlations observed between the number of classes in LULC schemes and overall accuracy and kappa coefficient indicate that the more complex the LULC scheme, the lower the accuracy produced. Nevertheless, improvement in overall accuracy was negligible for simple schemes (e.g., ∼1 % for two LULC classes), while it was moderate for complex schemes (∼5 %) when using the best-performing images for multi-date (June-October-December) compared to single-date (October) classifications: however, the improvement was considerable when compared to the least performing single-date image (June, 8–15 %). These varying classification accuracies were due to differences or similarities in spectral responses of target classes in the various LULC schemes applied to the investigated images. Consequently, the resulting differences in the spatial distribution and quantification of LULC classes produced by the different approaches can affect policy and land management decisions, especially if inappropriate image dates are used for LULC mapping. Overall, the findings highlight the reliability of appropriate single-date and multi-date images for mapping LULC change using simple and complex schemes in heterogeneous semi-arid savanna landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article e02434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of single and multi-date Landsat image classifications using random forest algorithm in a semi-arid savanna of Ghana, West Africa\",\"authors\":\"Eric Adjei Lawer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate detection and quantification of land use and land cover (LULC) change is critical for understanding landscape patterns in heterogeneous semi-arid environments. This study investigates the performance of single-date and multi-date Landsat images as well as the relationship between different LULC schemes (simple [2 and 4 classes] and complex [6 and 9 classes]) and the resulting classification accuracy. Specifically, the random forest algorithm was applied to Landsat data comprised of different combinations of image dates (single-date and multi-date) captured in June, October, and December for multiple levels of LULC (scheme) mapping and accuracy evaluations due to its high performance when dealing with large data and heterogeneous landscapes. Results indicated that multi-date images consistently produced higher classification accuracies than single-date images. Significant negative correlations observed between the number of classes in LULC schemes and overall accuracy and kappa coefficient indicate that the more complex the LULC scheme, the lower the accuracy produced. Nevertheless, improvement in overall accuracy was negligible for simple schemes (e.g., ∼1 % for two LULC classes), while it was moderate for complex schemes (∼5 %) when using the best-performing images for multi-date (June-October-December) compared to single-date (October) classifications: however, the improvement was considerable when compared to the least performing single-date image (June, 8–15 %). These varying classification accuracies were due to differences or similarities in spectral responses of target classes in the various LULC schemes applied to the investigated images. Consequently, the resulting differences in the spatial distribution and quantification of LULC classes produced by the different approaches can affect policy and land management decisions, especially if inappropriate image dates are used for LULC mapping. Overall, the findings highlight the reliability of appropriate single-date and multi-date images for mapping LULC change using simple and complex schemes in heterogeneous semi-arid savanna landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific African\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article e02434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific African\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624003764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确检测和量化土地利用和土地覆被变化对于了解异质半干旱环境中的景观模式至关重要。本研究调查了单日期和多日期 Landsat 图像的性能,以及不同 LULC 方案(简单 [2 类和 4 类] 与复杂 [6 类和 9 类] 之间的关系和由此产生的分类准确性。具体来说,由于随机森林算法在处理大量数据和异质地貌时具有很高的性能,因此将其应用于由 6 月、10 月和 12 月拍摄的不同影像日期组合(单日期和多日期)组成的 Landsat 数据,以进行多级 LULC(方案)绘图和准确性评估。结果表明,多日期图像的分类准确率始终高于单日期图像。在 LULC 方案的类别数量与总体准确率和卡帕系数之间观察到显著的负相关,表明 LULC 方案越复杂,产生的准确率就越低。然而,当使用多日期(6 月-10 月-12 月)表现最好的图像与单日期(10 月)分类相比时,简单方案的总体准确率提高微乎其微(例如,两个 LULC 类别的准确率为 1%∼1%),而复杂方案的准确率提高适中(5%∼5%);然而,与表现最差的单日期图像(6 月,8%-15%)相比,复杂方案的准确率提高显著。这些不同的分类精度是由于调查图像所采用的各种 LULC 方案中目标类别的光谱响应存在差异或相似性。因此,不同方法产生的 LULC 等级的空间分布和量化差异可能会影响政策和土地管理决策,尤其是在使用不恰当的图像日期绘制 LULC 地图的情况下。总之,研究结果强调了在异质半干旱热带稀树草原地貌中使用简单和复杂方案绘制 LULC 变化图时,适当的单日期和多日期图像的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of single and multi-date Landsat image classifications using random forest algorithm in a semi-arid savanna of Ghana, West Africa
Accurate detection and quantification of land use and land cover (LULC) change is critical for understanding landscape patterns in heterogeneous semi-arid environments. This study investigates the performance of single-date and multi-date Landsat images as well as the relationship between different LULC schemes (simple [2 and 4 classes] and complex [6 and 9 classes]) and the resulting classification accuracy. Specifically, the random forest algorithm was applied to Landsat data comprised of different combinations of image dates (single-date and multi-date) captured in June, October, and December for multiple levels of LULC (scheme) mapping and accuracy evaluations due to its high performance when dealing with large data and heterogeneous landscapes. Results indicated that multi-date images consistently produced higher classification accuracies than single-date images. Significant negative correlations observed between the number of classes in LULC schemes and overall accuracy and kappa coefficient indicate that the more complex the LULC scheme, the lower the accuracy produced. Nevertheless, improvement in overall accuracy was negligible for simple schemes (e.g., ∼1 % for two LULC classes), while it was moderate for complex schemes (∼5 %) when using the best-performing images for multi-date (June-October-December) compared to single-date (October) classifications: however, the improvement was considerable when compared to the least performing single-date image (June, 8–15 %). These varying classification accuracies were due to differences or similarities in spectral responses of target classes in the various LULC schemes applied to the investigated images. Consequently, the resulting differences in the spatial distribution and quantification of LULC classes produced by the different approaches can affect policy and land management decisions, especially if inappropriate image dates are used for LULC mapping. Overall, the findings highlight the reliability of appropriate single-date and multi-date images for mapping LULC change using simple and complex schemes in heterogeneous semi-arid savanna landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of soil quality degradation impacted by topsoil stockpiling of a surface mining operation in a Tropical climate. An approximate solution of multi-term fractional telegraph equation with quadratic B-spline basis functions Wind energy potential assessment using the Weibull distribution method for future energy self-sufficiency Fluoride contamination a silent global water crisis: A Case of Africa Modified Fractional Power Series Method for solving fractional partial differential equations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1