社会秩序还是社会正义?政治意识形态与消费者对企业社会责任偏好的关系

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104128
Antonios Tiganis , Polymeros Chrysochou , Panagiotis Mitkidis , Athanasios Krystallis
{"title":"社会秩序还是社会正义?政治意识形态与消费者对企业社会责任偏好的关系","authors":"Antonios Tiganis ,&nbsp;Polymeros Chrysochou ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Mitkidis ,&nbsp;Athanasios Krystallis","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the recognized importance of political ideology in shaping consumer behavior across various contexts, it remains unclear whether conservatives and liberals exhibit different preferences when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Using survey data from 598 respondents in the United States, our findings indicate a positive correlation between conservatism and consumer preference for customer, supplier, and shareholder CSR domains. Conversely, conservatism correlates negatively with consumer preference for environmental and societal CSR domains. These relationships are mediated by social order and social justice. Conservatism also has a negative indirect relationship with consumer preference for employee's CSR domain through social order. Overall, our study contributes to the marketing literature by demonstrating that political ideology is related to divergent preferences for CSR, with group-related moral motives serving as mediators in these relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104128"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility\",\"authors\":\"Antonios Tiganis ,&nbsp;Polymeros Chrysochou ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Mitkidis ,&nbsp;Athanasios Krystallis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the recognized importance of political ideology in shaping consumer behavior across various contexts, it remains unclear whether conservatives and liberals exhibit different preferences when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Using survey data from 598 respondents in the United States, our findings indicate a positive correlation between conservatism and consumer preference for customer, supplier, and shareholder CSR domains. Conversely, conservatism correlates negatively with consumer preference for environmental and societal CSR domains. These relationships are mediated by social order and social justice. Conservatism also has a negative indirect relationship with consumer preference for employee's CSR domain through social order. Overall, our study contributes to the marketing literature by demonstrating that political ideology is related to divergent preferences for CSR, with group-related moral motives serving as mediators in these relationships.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管政治意识形态在各种情况下影响消费者行为的重要性已得到公认,但保守派和自由派在企业社会责任(CSR)方面是否表现出不同的偏好仍不清楚。通过对美国 598 名受访者的调查数据,我们的研究结果表明,保守主义与消费者对客户、供应商和股东企业社会责任领域的偏好呈正相关。相反,保守主义与消费者对环境和社会企业社会责任领域的偏好呈负相关。这些关系是由社会秩序和社会公正中介的。保守主义还通过社会秩序与消费者对员工企业社会责任领域的偏好有间接负相关。总之,我们的研究证明了政治意识形态与企业社会责任偏好的差异有关,而与群体相关的道德动机在这些关系中起到了中介作用,从而为市场营销文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social order or social justice? The relationship of political ideology with consumer preferences for Corporate Social Responsibility
Despite the recognized importance of political ideology in shaping consumer behavior across various contexts, it remains unclear whether conservatives and liberals exhibit different preferences when it comes to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Using survey data from 598 respondents in the United States, our findings indicate a positive correlation between conservatism and consumer preference for customer, supplier, and shareholder CSR domains. Conversely, conservatism correlates negatively with consumer preference for environmental and societal CSR domains. These relationships are mediated by social order and social justice. Conservatism also has a negative indirect relationship with consumer preference for employee's CSR domain through social order. Overall, our study contributes to the marketing literature by demonstrating that political ideology is related to divergent preferences for CSR, with group-related moral motives serving as mediators in these relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1