{"title":"产前锻炼会影响分娩和生产结果吗?","authors":"Akanksha Chauhan, Anjali Gupta, Poonam Dhankher, Jagjit Singh Dalal, Nitika Jesingh, Savita Rani Singhal","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07801-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incorporating regular physical activity into the lifestyle of a pregnant woman offers numerous health benefits and prepares her effectively for labor. This study was conducted to determine the impact of antenatal exercise on labor, delivery and perinatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interventional study was conducted including 200 women attending the antenatal clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of PGIMS Rohtak, India. The study subjects were randomly divided into two groups-exercise group and control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic profile of both the groups was similar. A higher proportion of patients in control group required labor induction compared to exercise group (33% vs 16%, P = 0.002). The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in exercise group than in control group (71% vs 56%, P = 0.027). Additionally, women in exercise group had fewer assisted vaginal deliveries than control group (7% vs 20%, P = 0.007). Rates of cesarean section were comparable between both groups (P = 0.736). The mean duration of labor was significantly shorter in exercise group compared to control group (428.69 ± 131.242 min vs 516.91 ± 143.105 min, P < 0.0001). Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain was 6.38 ± 1.94 in exercise group compared to 7.89 ± 1.49 in control group (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the groups in birth weight and APGAR score of neonates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured exercise program, practiced regularly during the antenatal period reduced the need for labor induction, shortened labor duration, increased the incidence of vaginal deliveries, and decreased pain perception during labor and delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does antenatal exercise shape labor and delivery outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Akanksha Chauhan, Anjali Gupta, Poonam Dhankher, Jagjit Singh Dalal, Nitika Jesingh, Savita Rani Singhal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07801-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Incorporating regular physical activity into the lifestyle of a pregnant woman offers numerous health benefits and prepares her effectively for labor. This study was conducted to determine the impact of antenatal exercise on labor, delivery and perinatal outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interventional study was conducted including 200 women attending the antenatal clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of PGIMS Rohtak, India. The study subjects were randomly divided into two groups-exercise group and control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic profile of both the groups was similar. A higher proportion of patients in control group required labor induction compared to exercise group (33% vs 16%, P = 0.002). The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in exercise group than in control group (71% vs 56%, P = 0.027). Additionally, women in exercise group had fewer assisted vaginal deliveries than control group (7% vs 20%, P = 0.007). Rates of cesarean section were comparable between both groups (P = 0.736). The mean duration of labor was significantly shorter in exercise group compared to control group (428.69 ± 131.242 min vs 516.91 ± 143.105 min, P < 0.0001). Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain was 6.38 ± 1.94 in exercise group compared to 7.89 ± 1.49 in control group (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the groups in birth weight and APGAR score of neonates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured exercise program, practiced regularly during the antenatal period reduced the need for labor induction, shortened labor duration, increased the incidence of vaginal deliveries, and decreased pain perception during labor and delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07801-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07801-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does antenatal exercise shape labor and delivery outcomes?
Purpose: Incorporating regular physical activity into the lifestyle of a pregnant woman offers numerous health benefits and prepares her effectively for labor. This study was conducted to determine the impact of antenatal exercise on labor, delivery and perinatal outcome.
Methods: An interventional study was conducted including 200 women attending the antenatal clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of PGIMS Rohtak, India. The study subjects were randomly divided into two groups-exercise group and control group.
Results: The demographic profile of both the groups was similar. A higher proportion of patients in control group required labor induction compared to exercise group (33% vs 16%, P = 0.002). The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in exercise group than in control group (71% vs 56%, P = 0.027). Additionally, women in exercise group had fewer assisted vaginal deliveries than control group (7% vs 20%, P = 0.007). Rates of cesarean section were comparable between both groups (P = 0.736). The mean duration of labor was significantly shorter in exercise group compared to control group (428.69 ± 131.242 min vs 516.91 ± 143.105 min, P < 0.0001). Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for pain was 6.38 ± 1.94 in exercise group compared to 7.89 ± 1.49 in control group (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed between the groups in birth weight and APGAR score of neonates.
Conclusion: A structured exercise program, practiced regularly during the antenatal period reduced the need for labor induction, shortened labor duration, increased the incidence of vaginal deliveries, and decreased pain perception during labor and delivery.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.