调查 "单基因 "家族中多基因背景对癫痫表型的影响。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105404
Karen L Oliver, Ingrid E Scheffer, Colin A Ellis, Bronwyn E Grinton, Samuel F Berkovic, Melanie Bahlo
{"title":"调查 \"单基因 \"家族中多基因背景对癫痫表型的影响。","authors":"Karen L Oliver, Ingrid E Scheffer, Colin A Ellis, Bronwyn E Grinton, Samuel F Berkovic, Melanie Bahlo","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenotypic variability within families with epilepsy is often observed, even when relatives share the same monogenic cause. We aimed to investigate whether common polygenic risk for epilepsy could explain the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare pathogenic variants in familial epilepsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 58 clinically heterogeneous families with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Relatives were coded as either unaffected or affected with epilepsy, and graded according to phenotype severity: no seizures, febrile seizures (FS) only, febrile seizures plus (FS+), generalised/focal epilepsy, or developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Epilepsy polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were tested for association with epilepsy phenotype. Within families, the mean PRS difference was compared between pairs concordant versus discordant for phenotype severity. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed-effect regression models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>304 individuals segregating a known, or presumed, rare variant of large effect, were studied. Within families, higher epilepsy polygenic risk was associated with an epilepsy diagnosis (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08, 1.80, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.040). Relatives with a more severe phenotype had a mean pairwise PRS difference of +0.19 higher than relatives with a milder phenotype (p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.010). The difference increased with greater phenotype discordance between relatives. As the cohort included two rare variants with >30 relatives each, variant-specific genotype-phenotype associations could also be analysed. Whilst the epilepsy PRS effect was strong for relatives segregating the GABRG2 p.Arg82Gln pathogenic variant (p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.0010), the effect was not significant for SCN1B p.Cys121Trp.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We provide support for genetic background modifying the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare variants associated with 'monogenic' epilepsies. In GEFS+ families, relatives with higher epilepsy PRSs were more likely to show penetrance (epilepsy diagnosis) and a more severe phenotype. Variant-specific analyses suggest that some rare variants may be more susceptible to PRS modification, carrying important genetic counselling and disease prognostication implications for patients.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Medical Research Future Fund of Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the effect of polygenic background on epilepsy phenotype in 'monogenic' families.\",\"authors\":\"Karen L Oliver, Ingrid E Scheffer, Colin A Ellis, Bronwyn E Grinton, Samuel F Berkovic, Melanie Bahlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phenotypic variability within families with epilepsy is often observed, even when relatives share the same monogenic cause. We aimed to investigate whether common polygenic risk for epilepsy could explain the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare pathogenic variants in familial epilepsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 58 clinically heterogeneous families with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Relatives were coded as either unaffected or affected with epilepsy, and graded according to phenotype severity: no seizures, febrile seizures (FS) only, febrile seizures plus (FS+), generalised/focal epilepsy, or developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Epilepsy polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were tested for association with epilepsy phenotype. Within families, the mean PRS difference was compared between pairs concordant versus discordant for phenotype severity. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed-effect regression models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>304 individuals segregating a known, or presumed, rare variant of large effect, were studied. Within families, higher epilepsy polygenic risk was associated with an epilepsy diagnosis (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08, 1.80, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.040). Relatives with a more severe phenotype had a mean pairwise PRS difference of +0.19 higher than relatives with a milder phenotype (p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.010). The difference increased with greater phenotype discordance between relatives. As the cohort included two rare variants with >30 relatives each, variant-specific genotype-phenotype associations could also be analysed. Whilst the epilepsy PRS effect was strong for relatives segregating the GABRG2 p.Arg82Gln pathogenic variant (p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.0010), the effect was not significant for SCN1B p.Cys121Trp.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We provide support for genetic background modifying the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare variants associated with 'monogenic' epilepsies. In GEFS+ families, relatives with higher epilepsy PRSs were more likely to show penetrance (epilepsy diagnosis) and a more severe phenotype. Variant-specific analyses suggest that some rare variants may be more susceptible to PRS modification, carrying important genetic counselling and disease prognostication implications for patients.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Medical Research Future Fund of Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105404\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:即使亲属具有相同的单基因病因,癫痫家族内部也经常出现表型变异。我们的目的是研究癫痫的共同多基因风险能否解释家族性癫痫中罕见致病变异的渗透性和表型表达:我们研究了 58 个临床异质性遗传性癫痫伴发热性癫痫发作(GEFS+)家族。亲属被编码为未受影响或受癫痫影响,并根据表型严重程度进行分级:无癫痫发作、仅发热性癫痫发作(FS)、发热性癫痫发作加(FS+)、全身性/局灶性癫痫或发育性和癫痫性脑病(DEE)。对癫痫多基因风险评分(PRS)与癫痫表型的相关性进行了检测。在家族内部,比较了表型严重程度一致与不一致的两对之间的平均 PRS 差异。统计分析采用混合效应回归模型进行:研究了 304 个具有已知或推测的大效应罕见变异的个体。在家族中,较高的癫痫多基因风险与癫痫诊断有关(OR = 1.39,95% CI 1.08,1.80,padj = 0.040)。与表型较轻的亲属相比,表型较重的亲属的平均配对 PRS 差异为 +0.19(padj = 0.010)。亲属间的表型不一致程度越高,差异越大。由于队列中包括两个罕见变体,每个变体的亲属数均大于 30,因此还可以分析变体特异性基因型与表型之间的关联。虽然遗传 GABRG2 p.Arg82Gln 致病变异的亲属的癫痫 PRS 效应很强(padj = 0.0010),但 SCN1B p.Cys121Trp 的效应并不显著:我们为遗传背景改变与 "单基因 "癫痫相关的罕见变异的渗透性和表型表达提供了支持。在GEFS+家族中,癫痫PRS较高的亲属更有可能表现出渗透性(癫痫诊断)和更严重的表型。变体特异性分析表明,一些罕见变体可能更容易受到PRS改变的影响,这对患者的遗传咨询和疾病预后具有重要意义:澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会、澳大利亚医学研究未来基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the effect of polygenic background on epilepsy phenotype in 'monogenic' families.

Background: Phenotypic variability within families with epilepsy is often observed, even when relatives share the same monogenic cause. We aimed to investigate whether common polygenic risk for epilepsy could explain the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare pathogenic variants in familial epilepsies.

Methods: We studied 58 clinically heterogeneous families with genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+). Relatives were coded as either unaffected or affected with epilepsy, and graded according to phenotype severity: no seizures, febrile seizures (FS) only, febrile seizures plus (FS+), generalised/focal epilepsy, or developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). Epilepsy polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were tested for association with epilepsy phenotype. Within families, the mean PRS difference was compared between pairs concordant versus discordant for phenotype severity. Statistical analyses were performed using mixed-effect regression models.

Findings: 304 individuals segregating a known, or presumed, rare variant of large effect, were studied. Within families, higher epilepsy polygenic risk was associated with an epilepsy diagnosis (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08, 1.80, padj = 0.040). Relatives with a more severe phenotype had a mean pairwise PRS difference of +0.19 higher than relatives with a milder phenotype (padj = 0.010). The difference increased with greater phenotype discordance between relatives. As the cohort included two rare variants with >30 relatives each, variant-specific genotype-phenotype associations could also be analysed. Whilst the epilepsy PRS effect was strong for relatives segregating the GABRG2 p.Arg82Gln pathogenic variant (padj = 0.0010), the effect was not significant for SCN1B p.Cys121Trp.

Interpretation: We provide support for genetic background modifying the penetrance and phenotypic expression of rare variants associated with 'monogenic' epilepsies. In GEFS+ families, relatives with higher epilepsy PRSs were more likely to show penetrance (epilepsy diagnosis) and a more severe phenotype. Variant-specific analyses suggest that some rare variants may be more susceptible to PRS modification, carrying important genetic counselling and disease prognostication implications for patients.

Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Medical Research Future Fund of Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Adoptive T cell therapies for solid tumors: T(I)ME is of the essence. Protecting vulnerable populations in extreme heat - a growing and pervasive health challenge. Identifying WHO global priority endemic pathogens for vaccine research and development (R&D) using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): an objective of the Immunization Agenda 2030. Association between seizure reduction during ketogenic diet treatment of epilepsy and changes in circulatory metabolites and gut microbiota composition. Identification of late-stage tau accumulation using plasma phospho-tau217.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1