与标准结肠镜相比,具有超宽视野的新型结肠镜可提高息肉检出率:基于模型的前瞻性试验。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2422-9502
Horst Neuhaus, Tanja Nowak, Arthur Schmidt
{"title":"与标准结肠镜相比,具有超宽视野的新型结肠镜可提高息肉检出率:基于模型的前瞻性试验。","authors":"Horst Neuhaus, Tanja Nowak, Arthur Schmidt","doi":"10.1055/a-2422-9502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Colonoscopy, the gold standard for early detection of colorectal cancer, may miss polyps especially those hidden behind folds. This prospective study compared polyp detection and performance of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide field of view (EFOV) of 230 degrees (partially retrograde) to a standard colonoscope (SC, 170 degrees) in a colon model. <b>Patients and methods</b> A 3D printed colon model was used featuring 12 polyps placed throughout different colon segments, with several located on the proximal side of haustral folds. Endoscopists were instructed to identify polyps, first inserting the SC immediately followed by the EFOV device, and to place a snare to simulate a polypectomy. A standardized survey was used to record operator impressions. <b>Results</b> Twenty-nine experienced endoscopists participated in this study. On average, 5.3 vs 9.6 polyps were detected with the standard and EFOV colonoscopes, respectively ( <i>P</i> < 0.001). Five of 29 operators (17.2%) detected all 12 polyps with the EFOV device, whereas no operator detected all polyps with the SC. The success rate for snare placement was 100% for both endoscopes with similar times (mean of 14 vs 15 seconds for SC and EFOV, respectively). EFOV handling and optical performance were rated as equally good or better by all endoscopists. <b>Conclusions</b> Use of a colonoscope with novel optics significantly improved polyp detection compared with a standard colonoscope in this non-randomized model-based study, with favorable performance and usability ratings for the EFOV instrument. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these encouraging preliminary results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"E1230-E1236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel colonoscope with an extra-wide field of view increases polyp detection rate compared with standard colonoscope: Prospective model-based trial.\",\"authors\":\"Horst Neuhaus, Tanja Nowak, Arthur Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2422-9502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and study aims</b> Colonoscopy, the gold standard for early detection of colorectal cancer, may miss polyps especially those hidden behind folds. This prospective study compared polyp detection and performance of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide field of view (EFOV) of 230 degrees (partially retrograde) to a standard colonoscope (SC, 170 degrees) in a colon model. <b>Patients and methods</b> A 3D printed colon model was used featuring 12 polyps placed throughout different colon segments, with several located on the proximal side of haustral folds. Endoscopists were instructed to identify polyps, first inserting the SC immediately followed by the EFOV device, and to place a snare to simulate a polypectomy. A standardized survey was used to record operator impressions. <b>Results</b> Twenty-nine experienced endoscopists participated in this study. On average, 5.3 vs 9.6 polyps were detected with the standard and EFOV colonoscopes, respectively ( <i>P</i> < 0.001). Five of 29 operators (17.2%) detected all 12 polyps with the EFOV device, whereas no operator detected all polyps with the SC. The success rate for snare placement was 100% for both endoscopes with similar times (mean of 14 vs 15 seconds for SC and EFOV, respectively). EFOV handling and optical performance were rated as equally good or better by all endoscopists. <b>Conclusions</b> Use of a colonoscope with novel optics significantly improved polyp detection compared with a standard colonoscope in this non-randomized model-based study, with favorable performance and usability ratings for the EFOV instrument. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these encouraging preliminary results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"E1230-E1236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2422-9502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2422-9502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的 结肠镜检查是早期发现结肠直肠癌的金标准,但可能会漏检息肉,尤其是隐藏在褶皱后面的息肉。这项前瞻性研究在结肠模型中比较了具有 230 度(部分逆行)超宽视野 (EFOV) 的新型结肠镜与标准结肠镜(SC,170 度)的息肉检测效果和性能。患者和方法 采用 3D 打印结肠模型,12 个息肉分布在不同的结肠段,其中几个位于肛门褶皱近侧。指导内镜医师识别息肉,首先插入 SC,紧接着插入 EFOV 设备,然后放置套管以模拟息肉切除术。使用标准化调查表记录操作者的印象。结果 29 位经验丰富的内镜医师参与了这项研究。使用标准结肠镜和 EFOV 结肠镜平均分别发现 5.3 个和 9.6 个息肉(P < 0.001)。在 29 位操作者中,有 5 位(17.2%)使用 EFOV 设备发现了全部 12 个息肉,而使用 SC 的操作者则没有发现全部息肉。两种内窥镜放置套管的成功率均为 100%,时间相近(SC 和 EFOV 的平均时间分别为 14 秒和 15 秒)。所有内镜医师都认为 EFOV 的操作和光学性能同样好或更好。结论 在这项基于模型的非随机研究中,与标准结肠镜相比,使用新型光学结肠镜能显著提高息肉检测率,EFOV 仪器的性能和可用性也得到了好评。这些令人鼓舞的初步结果还需要临床研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel colonoscope with an extra-wide field of view increases polyp detection rate compared with standard colonoscope: Prospective model-based trial.

Background and study aims Colonoscopy, the gold standard for early detection of colorectal cancer, may miss polyps especially those hidden behind folds. This prospective study compared polyp detection and performance of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide field of view (EFOV) of 230 degrees (partially retrograde) to a standard colonoscope (SC, 170 degrees) in a colon model. Patients and methods A 3D printed colon model was used featuring 12 polyps placed throughout different colon segments, with several located on the proximal side of haustral folds. Endoscopists were instructed to identify polyps, first inserting the SC immediately followed by the EFOV device, and to place a snare to simulate a polypectomy. A standardized survey was used to record operator impressions. Results Twenty-nine experienced endoscopists participated in this study. On average, 5.3 vs 9.6 polyps were detected with the standard and EFOV colonoscopes, respectively ( P < 0.001). Five of 29 operators (17.2%) detected all 12 polyps with the EFOV device, whereas no operator detected all polyps with the SC. The success rate for snare placement was 100% for both endoscopes with similar times (mean of 14 vs 15 seconds for SC and EFOV, respectively). EFOV handling and optical performance were rated as equally good or better by all endoscopists. Conclusions Use of a colonoscope with novel optics significantly improved polyp detection compared with a standard colonoscope in this non-randomized model-based study, with favorable performance and usability ratings for the EFOV instrument. Clinical studies are needed to confirm these encouraging preliminary results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1