药物诱发的非感染性心肌炎:FAERS 数据库的比例失调分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679
Liyuan Yan, Guanqun Zheng
{"title":"药物诱发的非感染性心肌炎:FAERS 数据库的比例失调分析。","authors":"Liyuan Yan, Guanqun Zheng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This investigation aims to identify and evaluate the most common and critical drugs associated with the risk of noninfectious myocarditis utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data pertaining to noninfectious myocarditis from 2004 Q1 to 2024 Q2 were extracted. Following data standardization, multiple signal quantification techniques, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio, were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified a total of 10,763 adverse event reports associated with noninfectious myocarditis. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top 5 drugs by ROR were phendimetrazine tartrate (ROR 104.64), trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (ROR 67.65), aldesleukin (ROR 52.67), mesalazine (ROR 49.73), and balsalazide disodium (ROR 45.26). Notably, among the 30 drugs with the strongest ROR signals, 8 drugs lacked myocarditis risk information in their package inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database, our study identified drugs with a strong signal for myocarditis that are not currently indicated on their labels. The findings suggest that the potential risk of myocarditis associated with these medications is significant and warrants close monitoring in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.\",\"authors\":\"Liyuan Yan, Guanqun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This investigation aims to identify and evaluate the most common and critical drugs associated with the risk of noninfectious myocarditis utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data pertaining to noninfectious myocarditis from 2004 Q1 to 2024 Q2 were extracted. Following data standardization, multiple signal quantification techniques, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio, were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified a total of 10,763 adverse event reports associated with noninfectious myocarditis. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top 5 drugs by ROR were phendimetrazine tartrate (ROR 104.64), trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (ROR 67.65), aldesleukin (ROR 52.67), mesalazine (ROR 49.73), and balsalazide disodium (ROR 45.26). Notably, among the 30 drugs with the strongest ROR signals, 8 drugs lacked myocarditis risk information in their package inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database, our study identified drugs with a strong signal for myocarditis that are not currently indicated on their labels. The findings suggest that the potential risk of myocarditis associated with these medications is significant and warrants close monitoring in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本调查旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,确定并评估与非感染性心肌炎风险相关的最常见和最关键药物:这项调查旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,确定和评估与非感染性心肌炎风险相关的最常见和最重要的药物:提取2004年第一季度至2024年第二季度与非感染性心肌炎相关的数据。数据标准化后,采用多种信号量化技术进行分析,包括报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比:研究共发现了 10,763 份与非感染性心肌炎相关的不良事件报告。比例失调分析显示,按ROR计算,排名前5位的药物分别是酒石酸芬地美嗪(ROR 104.64)、三甲双胍+磺胺甲噁唑(ROR 67.65)、醛固酮(ROR 52.67)、美沙拉秦(ROR 49.73)和巴柳氮二钠(ROR 45.26)。值得注意的是,在 ROR 信号最强的 30 种药物中,有 8 种药物的包装说明书中缺乏心肌炎风险信息:通过对 FAERS 数据库的全面分析,我们的研究发现了目前标签上未标明的心肌炎强信号药物。研究结果表明,这些药物引发心肌炎的潜在风险很大,需要在临床实践中密切监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.

Background: This investigation aims to identify and evaluate the most common and critical drugs associated with the risk of noninfectious myocarditis utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: Data pertaining to noninfectious myocarditis from 2004 Q1 to 2024 Q2 were extracted. Following data standardization, multiple signal quantification techniques, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio, were employed for analysis.

Results: The study identified a total of 10,763 adverse event reports associated with noninfectious myocarditis. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top 5 drugs by ROR were phendimetrazine tartrate (ROR 104.64), trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (ROR 67.65), aldesleukin (ROR 52.67), mesalazine (ROR 49.73), and balsalazide disodium (ROR 45.26). Notably, among the 30 drugs with the strongest ROR signals, 8 drugs lacked myocarditis risk information in their package inserts.

Conclusion: Through comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database, our study identified drugs with a strong signal for myocarditis that are not currently indicated on their labels. The findings suggest that the potential risk of myocarditis associated with these medications is significant and warrants close monitoring in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Safety concerns of aztreonam: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Preserving residual kidney function in persons on peritoneal dialysis: the role of pharmacotherapy. Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced cystitis: analysis of FDA data from 2004 to 2024. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1