肿瘤缩小乳房整形术的肿瘤学和手术效果:单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13762
Jérôme Martineau, Boran Tekdogan, Giang-Thanh Lam, Daniel Correia, Salvatore Giordano, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges
{"title":"肿瘤缩小乳房整形术的肿瘤学和手术效果:单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Jérôme Martineau, Boran Tekdogan, Giang-Thanh Lam, Daniel Correia, Salvatore Giordano, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to improve both oncologic and aesthetic outcomes by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques. Using breast reduction techniques in breast cancer treatment has been shown to allow for wider margins of excision, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the surgical and oncological outcomes of a large cohort of patients undergoing oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes of all patients who underwent ORM at a single center between January 2018 and December 2023 was performed. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients that underwent oncologic breast reduction were included in the final analysis - representing a total of 71 ORM, with a mean (SD) age of 53.1 (10.5) years and a mean (SD) BMI of 28.8 (5.9) kg/m<sup>2</sup> A superomedial pedicle-based technique was the most frequently used (36.6%), followed by inferior pedicle-based technique (28.1%). A complication rate of 18.3% on the ipsilateral side was observed. Salvage surgery was necessary in five cases (7.0%) due to positive margins - with one patient (1.4%) requiring margin expansion surgery and four (5.6%) a completion mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This monocentric retrospective study shows that ORM is safe, with a complication rate on par with conventional breast reduction and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2820-2826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Martineau, Boran Tekdogan, Giang-Thanh Lam, Daniel Correia, Salvatore Giordano, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to improve both oncologic and aesthetic outcomes by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques. Using breast reduction techniques in breast cancer treatment has been shown to allow for wider margins of excision, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the surgical and oncological outcomes of a large cohort of patients undergoing oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes of all patients who underwent ORM at a single center between January 2018 and December 2023 was performed. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 67 patients that underwent oncologic breast reduction were included in the final analysis - representing a total of 71 ORM, with a mean (SD) age of 53.1 (10.5) years and a mean (SD) BMI of 28.8 (5.9) kg/m<sup>2</sup> A superomedial pedicle-based technique was the most frequently used (36.6%), followed by inferior pedicle-based technique (28.1%). A complication rate of 18.3% on the ipsilateral side was observed. Salvage surgery was necessary in five cases (7.0%) due to positive margins - with one patient (1.4%) requiring margin expansion surgery and four (5.6%) a completion mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This monocentric retrospective study shows that ORM is safe, with a complication rate on par with conventional breast reduction and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"2820-2826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13762\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:保乳手术是早期乳腺癌的首选治疗方法,但往往会导致不理想的美容效果。肿瘤整形手术旨在通过将局部切除与整形技术相结合来改善肿瘤和美容效果。在乳腺癌治疗中使用乳房缩小技术已被证明可以扩大切除范围,从而提高肿瘤安全性并降低复发率,同时不会造成明显的不对称。本研究旨在分析一大批接受肿瘤整形缩小乳房术(ORM)患者的手术和肿瘤治疗效果:对2018年1月至2023年12月期间在一个中心接受肿瘤整形缩小乳房成形术的所有患者的术后手术和肿瘤结果进行了回顾性分析。对术前患者特征、手术和术后结果进行了记录和分析:共有67名接受肿瘤性乳房缩小术的患者被纳入最终分析--代表了71例乳房缩小术,平均(标清)年龄为53.1(10.5)岁,平均(标清)体重指数为28.8(5.9)千克/平方米,最常使用的是基于上内侧椎弓根的技术(36.6%),其次是基于下椎弓根的技术(28.1%)。同侧的并发症发生率为 18.3%。5例患者(7.0%)因边缘阳性而需要进行挽救手术,其中1例患者(1.4%)需要进行边缘扩大手术,4例患者(5.6%)需要进行完整乳房切除术:这项单中心回顾性研究表明,乳房缩小术是安全的,其并发症发生率与传统乳房缩小术相当,并能提供令人满意的肿瘤治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oncological and Surgical Outcomes of Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Single-centre Retrospective Study.

Background/aim: Breast-conserving surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage breast cancer but can often result in unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Oncoplastic surgery aims to improve both oncologic and aesthetic outcomes by combining local excision with plastic surgery techniques. Using breast reduction techniques in breast cancer treatment has been shown to allow for wider margins of excision, leading to enhanced oncological safety and reduced recurrence rates without causing significant asymmetry. This study aimed to analyze the surgical and oncological outcomes of a large cohort of patients undergoing oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty (ORM).

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of postoperative surgical and oncological outcomes of all patients who underwent ORM at a single center between January 2018 and December 2023 was performed. Preoperative patient characteristics, operative and post-operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

Results: A total of 67 patients that underwent oncologic breast reduction were included in the final analysis - representing a total of 71 ORM, with a mean (SD) age of 53.1 (10.5) years and a mean (SD) BMI of 28.8 (5.9) kg/m2 A superomedial pedicle-based technique was the most frequently used (36.6%), followed by inferior pedicle-based technique (28.1%). A complication rate of 18.3% on the ipsilateral side was observed. Salvage surgery was necessary in five cases (7.0%) due to positive margins - with one patient (1.4%) requiring margin expansion surgery and four (5.6%) a completion mastectomy.

Conclusion: This monocentric retrospective study shows that ORM is safe, with a complication rate on par with conventional breast reduction and offers satisfactory oncological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-based Cytological Features of Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified, Extrauterine Adenocarcinoma, and Other Malignant Neoplasms of The Uterine Cervix: A 5-year Single-institutional Experience With 30 Consecutive Patients. Long-term Effect of the HCV Elimination With Direct-acting Antivirals on the Progression of Gastroesophageal Varices. Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders. Malignant Triton Tumor of the Distal Femur: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Management of Recurrent Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia With Oritavancin: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1