最新的元分析显示维生素 D 补充剂对慢性腰痛的疗效有限。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL In vivo Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13778
Tsai-Jean Lee, Ru-Yin Tsai, Chi-Chung Ho, Chien-Min Chen, Chen-Pi Li
{"title":"最新的元分析显示维生素 D 补充剂对慢性腰痛的疗效有限。","authors":"Tsai-Jean Lee, Ru-Yin Tsai, Chi-Chung Ho, Chien-Min Chen, Chen-Pi Li","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly reduces quality of life and increases reliance on healthcare resources. Despite many individuals opting for vitamin D supplementation to alleviate CLBP, its efficacy remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in treating this condition.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in adults with CLBP, focusing exclusively on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to May 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results indicated that vitamin D supplementation did not significantly reduce pain scores compared to control groups (SMD: -0.130, 95%CI=-0.260 to 0.000; I<sup>2</sup>=0%), regardless of participants' baseline vitamin D levels. Moreover, long-term supplementation showed no notable improvement in CLBP outcomes (SMD: -0.097, 95%CI=-0.290 to -0.097; I<sup>2</sup>=19.878%). Additionally, supplementation with active forms of vitamin D (SMD: -0.321, 95%CI=-0.670 to 0.028; I<sup>2</sup>=0.000%) did not result in significant pain relief for chronic lower back pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitamin D supplementation does not substantially alleviate CLBP. Nevertheless, it may still be considered as part of a comprehensive treatment plan. Further research is necessary to explore its long-term effects and the underlying mechanisms that may explain the observed lack of benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"38 6","pages":"2955-2967"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updated Meta-analysis Reveals Limited Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation in Chronic Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Tsai-Jean Lee, Ru-Yin Tsai, Chi-Chung Ho, Chien-Min Chen, Chen-Pi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly reduces quality of life and increases reliance on healthcare resources. Despite many individuals opting for vitamin D supplementation to alleviate CLBP, its efficacy remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in treating this condition.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in adults with CLBP, focusing exclusively on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to May 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results indicated that vitamin D supplementation did not significantly reduce pain scores compared to control groups (SMD: -0.130, 95%CI=-0.260 to 0.000; I<sup>2</sup>=0%), regardless of participants' baseline vitamin D levels. Moreover, long-term supplementation showed no notable improvement in CLBP outcomes (SMD: -0.097, 95%CI=-0.290 to -0.097; I<sup>2</sup>=19.878%). Additionally, supplementation with active forms of vitamin D (SMD: -0.321, 95%CI=-0.670 to 0.028; I<sup>2</sup>=0.000%) did not result in significant pain relief for chronic lower back pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vitamin D supplementation does not substantially alleviate CLBP. Nevertheless, it may still be considered as part of a comprehensive treatment plan. Further research is necessary to explore its long-term effects and the underlying mechanisms that may explain the observed lack of benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"38 6\",\"pages\":\"2955-2967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535934/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13778\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13778","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:慢性腰背痛(CLBP)大大降低了人们的生活质量,增加了对医疗资源的依赖。尽管许多人选择补充维生素 D 来缓解慢性腰背痛,但其疗效仍有待商榷。这项荟萃分析旨在评估补充维生素 D 对治疗这种疾病的潜在益处:根据 PRISMA 指南,我们系统地回顾了维生素 D 补充剂对 CLBP 成人患者的疗效,重点关注随机对照试验 (RCT)。截至 2024 年 5 月,我们在多个数据库(包括 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science)中进行了全面的文献检索:对符合纳入标准的 10 项研究进行了分析。结果表明,与对照组相比,维生素 D 补充剂并未显著降低疼痛评分(SMD:-0.130,95%CI=-0.260 至 0.000;I2=0%),与参与者的基线维生素 D 水平无关。此外,长期补充维生素 D 并未明显改善 CLBP 的结果(SMD:-0.097,95%CI=-0.290 至 -0.097;I2=19.878%)。此外,补充活性维生素 D(SMD:-0.321,95%CI=-0.670 至 0.028;I2=0.000%)并不能显著缓解慢性下背痛的疼痛:结论:补充维生素 D 并不能显著缓解慢性下背痛。结论:补充维生素 D 并不能显著缓解慢性下背痛,但仍可将其作为综合治疗方案的一部分。有必要开展进一步研究,探讨维生素 D 补充剂的长期效果以及可能解释所观察到的缺乏益处的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Updated Meta-analysis Reveals Limited Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation in Chronic Low Back Pain.

Background/aim: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) significantly reduces quality of life and increases reliance on healthcare resources. Despite many individuals opting for vitamin D supplementation to alleviate CLBP, its efficacy remains debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in treating this condition.

Patients and methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in adults with CLBP, focusing exclusively on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to May 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science.

Results: Ten RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results indicated that vitamin D supplementation did not significantly reduce pain scores compared to control groups (SMD: -0.130, 95%CI=-0.260 to 0.000; I2=0%), regardless of participants' baseline vitamin D levels. Moreover, long-term supplementation showed no notable improvement in CLBP outcomes (SMD: -0.097, 95%CI=-0.290 to -0.097; I2=19.878%). Additionally, supplementation with active forms of vitamin D (SMD: -0.321, 95%CI=-0.670 to 0.028; I2=0.000%) did not result in significant pain relief for chronic lower back pain.

Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation does not substantially alleviate CLBP. Nevertheless, it may still be considered as part of a comprehensive treatment plan. Further research is necessary to explore its long-term effects and the underlying mechanisms that may explain the observed lack of benefit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Liquid-based Cytological Features of Adenocarcinoma Not Otherwise Specified, Extrauterine Adenocarcinoma, and Other Malignant Neoplasms of The Uterine Cervix: A 5-year Single-institutional Experience With 30 Consecutive Patients. Long-term Effect of the HCV Elimination With Direct-acting Antivirals on the Progression of Gastroesophageal Varices. Long-term Impacts of Long COVID: Increased Incidence of Cardiomyopathies, Joint Diseases, and Psychoanxiety Disorders. Malignant Triton Tumor of the Distal Femur: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Management of Recurrent Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium Bacteremia With Oritavancin: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1