A. Maldague , G. Daube , L. Martinelle , C. Lagamme , S. Crèvecoeur , M. Vandenheede , N. Korsak
{"title":"延长从放血到切割的时间间隔对农场屠宰牛胴体微生物质量的影响。","authors":"A. Maldague , G. Daube , L. Martinelle , C. Lagamme , S. Crèvecoeur , M. Vandenheede , N. Korsak","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The uncertainties surrounding the microbiological risks of an extended exsanguination-to-evisceration interval have limited the implementation of on-farm slaughter in Europe. On-farm slaughter is increasingly advocated by farmers, consumers, and policymakers as a humane alternative to traditional slaughterhouse operations. However, concerns about hygiene and food safety, particularly bacterial contamination, have led to stringent time limits imposed by Member States on the interval between bleeding and evisceration. Microbiological standards for bovine carcasses in the European Union are governed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005, which sets process hygiene criteria for aerobic colony count and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>. To investigate whether extending the bleed-to-evisceration interval compromises meat safety, five Holstein dairy cattle were slaughtered on-farm, with samples collected from the internal paralumbar area in contact with the intestines for up to 4 h postmortem. The samples were analyzed for <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>, aerobic colony count, and <em>Escherichia coli</em>. None of the samples exceeded the established thresholds of 1.5 and 3.5 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> for aerobic colony count and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>, respectively, as defined by Belgian health authorities for the nondestructive sampling method. These preliminary findings suggest that on-farm slaughter with evisceration occurring up to 4 h post-mortem does not pose increased microbiological risks to human health. However, further research is necessary, particularly under warmer environmental conditions and with a larger sample size, to confirm these results and to explore additional factors that may influence bacterial translocation and digestive tract wall integrity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 12","pages":"Article 100392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of an Extended Bleed-to-evisceration Interval on the Microbiological Quality of On-farm Slaughtered Cattle Carcasses\",\"authors\":\"A. Maldague , G. Daube , L. Martinelle , C. Lagamme , S. Crèvecoeur , M. Vandenheede , N. Korsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The uncertainties surrounding the microbiological risks of an extended exsanguination-to-evisceration interval have limited the implementation of on-farm slaughter in Europe. On-farm slaughter is increasingly advocated by farmers, consumers, and policymakers as a humane alternative to traditional slaughterhouse operations. However, concerns about hygiene and food safety, particularly bacterial contamination, have led to stringent time limits imposed by Member States on the interval between bleeding and evisceration. Microbiological standards for bovine carcasses in the European Union are governed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005, which sets process hygiene criteria for aerobic colony count and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>. To investigate whether extending the bleed-to-evisceration interval compromises meat safety, five Holstein dairy cattle were slaughtered on-farm, with samples collected from the internal paralumbar area in contact with the intestines for up to 4 h postmortem. The samples were analyzed for <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>, aerobic colony count, and <em>Escherichia coli</em>. None of the samples exceeded the established thresholds of 1.5 and 3.5 log CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> for aerobic colony count and <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em>, respectively, as defined by Belgian health authorities for the nondestructive sampling method. These preliminary findings suggest that on-farm slaughter with evisceration occurring up to 4 h post-mortem does not pose increased microbiological risks to human health. However, further research is necessary, particularly under warmer environmental conditions and with a larger sample size, to confirm these results and to explore additional factors that may influence bacterial translocation and digestive tract wall integrity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 100392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001765\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X24001765","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of an Extended Bleed-to-evisceration Interval on the Microbiological Quality of On-farm Slaughtered Cattle Carcasses
The uncertainties surrounding the microbiological risks of an extended exsanguination-to-evisceration interval have limited the implementation of on-farm slaughter in Europe. On-farm slaughter is increasingly advocated by farmers, consumers, and policymakers as a humane alternative to traditional slaughterhouse operations. However, concerns about hygiene and food safety, particularly bacterial contamination, have led to stringent time limits imposed by Member States on the interval between bleeding and evisceration. Microbiological standards for bovine carcasses in the European Union are governed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005, which sets process hygiene criteria for aerobic colony count and Enterobacteriaceae. To investigate whether extending the bleed-to-evisceration interval compromises meat safety, five Holstein dairy cattle were slaughtered on-farm, with samples collected from the internal paralumbar area in contact with the intestines for up to 4 h postmortem. The samples were analyzed for Enterobacteriaceae, aerobic colony count, and Escherichia coli. None of the samples exceeded the established thresholds of 1.5 and 3.5 log CFU/cm2 for aerobic colony count and Enterobacteriaceae, respectively, as defined by Belgian health authorities for the nondestructive sampling method. These preliminary findings suggest that on-farm slaughter with evisceration occurring up to 4 h post-mortem does not pose increased microbiological risks to human health. However, further research is necessary, particularly under warmer environmental conditions and with a larger sample size, to confirm these results and to explore additional factors that may influence bacterial translocation and digestive tract wall integrity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.