{"title":"[聚醚醚酮框架对种植体支撑的上颌固定修复体应力分布的分析:三维有限元分析]。","authors":"Xiang-Yong Han, Ya-Qiong Ju, Lin-Lin Zhang, Zhi-Juan Tian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the stress distribution of polyetheretherketone framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis by three-dimensional finite element method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three dimensional finite element model of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis was established. Polyetheretherketone as framework material, resin, zirconia, PEEK, baked plastic and lithium silicate were used to make crown prosthesis as experimental group, pure titanium and monolithic zirconia prosthesis model was used as control group. The feasibility of PEEK framework was analyzed by loading 150N axially and obliquely on the first molar, and the maximum compressive stress, minimum tensile stress and von Mises principal stress of the framework, crown, screw, implant, cortical and cancellous bone were measured and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under axially loading, the von Mises stress in the monolithic zirconia and lithium silicate crowns were 361 MPa and 295 MPa, while the stress in resin and PEEK crowns were 35 MPa and 37 MPa, respectively. The screw von Mises stress of the experimental group was 694-724 MPa, which was much higher than 61 MPa of the control group.The maximum and minimum stresses of the screw appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown group. Under oblique loading,von Mises stress of the framework in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, but the maximum stress appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown. von Mises stresses of monolic zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns in the experimental group were higher than that of resin and PEEK crowns. von Mises stress of the implant in the experimental group was twice that of the control group. von Mises stress in screw of the experimental group was much higher than that of the control group, and the maximum stress was 22 times that of the control group. The stresses of cancellous bone and cortical bone in the experimental group were twice that of the control group, and the differences were larger than that under vertical loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In order to reduce the stress of crowns,resin or PEEK materials are preferred to be used as the crown prosthesis when PEEK was framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis. Reducing the cantilever and lateral force may avoid excessive stress in screw.</p>","PeriodicalId":21709,"journal":{"name":"上海口腔医学","volume":"33 4","pages":"367-372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analysis of polyetheretherketone framework on the stress distribution of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis: 3-D finite element analysis].\",\"authors\":\"Xiang-Yong Han, Ya-Qiong Ju, Lin-Lin Zhang, Zhi-Juan Tian\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the stress distribution of polyetheretherketone framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis by three-dimensional finite element method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three dimensional finite element model of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis was established. Polyetheretherketone as framework material, resin, zirconia, PEEK, baked plastic and lithium silicate were used to make crown prosthesis as experimental group, pure titanium and monolithic zirconia prosthesis model was used as control group. The feasibility of PEEK framework was analyzed by loading 150N axially and obliquely on the first molar, and the maximum compressive stress, minimum tensile stress and von Mises principal stress of the framework, crown, screw, implant, cortical and cancellous bone were measured and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under axially loading, the von Mises stress in the monolithic zirconia and lithium silicate crowns were 361 MPa and 295 MPa, while the stress in resin and PEEK crowns were 35 MPa and 37 MPa, respectively. The screw von Mises stress of the experimental group was 694-724 MPa, which was much higher than 61 MPa of the control group.The maximum and minimum stresses of the screw appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown group. Under oblique loading,von Mises stress of the framework in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, but the maximum stress appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown. von Mises stresses of monolic zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns in the experimental group were higher than that of resin and PEEK crowns. von Mises stress of the implant in the experimental group was twice that of the control group. von Mises stress in screw of the experimental group was much higher than that of the control group, and the maximum stress was 22 times that of the control group. The stresses of cancellous bone and cortical bone in the experimental group were twice that of the control group, and the differences were larger than that under vertical loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In order to reduce the stress of crowns,resin or PEEK materials are preferred to be used as the crown prosthesis when PEEK was framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis. Reducing the cantilever and lateral force may avoid excessive stress in screw.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"上海口腔医学\",\"volume\":\"33 4\",\"pages\":\"367-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"上海口腔医学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"上海口腔医学","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用三维有限元法分析种植体支撑的上颌固定义齿聚醚醚酮骨架的应力分布:方法:建立种植体支持的上颌固定修复体的三维有限元模型。以聚醚醚酮为骨架材料,树脂、氧化锆、PEEK、烤塑、硅酸锂等材料制作冠修复体为实验组,纯钛、单片氧化锆修复体模型为对照组。通过对第一磨牙施加 150N 的轴向和斜向负荷,分析了 PEEK 框架的可行性,并测量和比较了框架、牙冠、螺钉、种植体、皮质骨和松质骨的最大压应力、最小拉应力和 von Mises 主应力:在轴向加载下,整体氧化锆冠和硅酸锂冠的 von Mises 应力分别为 361 兆帕和 295 兆帕,而树脂冠和 PEEK 冠的应力分别为 35 兆帕和 37 兆帕。实验组螺钉的 von Mises 应力为 694-724 MPa,远高于对照组的 61 MPa。实验组单晶氧化锆冠和二硅酸锂冠的 von Mises 应力高于树脂冠和 PEEK 冠。实验组种植体的 von Mises 应力是对照组的两倍。实验组松质骨和皮质骨的应力是对照组的两倍,且差异大于垂直加载下的差异:为了降低牙冠的应力,当 PEEK 材料作为种植体支持的上颌固定修复体的骨架时,应优先选择树脂或 PEEK 材料作为牙冠修复体。减少悬臂力和侧向力可以避免螺钉应力过大。
[Analysis of polyetheretherketone framework on the stress distribution of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis: 3-D finite element analysis].
Purpose: To analyze the stress distribution of polyetheretherketone framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis by three-dimensional finite element method.
Methods: Three dimensional finite element model of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis was established. Polyetheretherketone as framework material, resin, zirconia, PEEK, baked plastic and lithium silicate were used to make crown prosthesis as experimental group, pure titanium and monolithic zirconia prosthesis model was used as control group. The feasibility of PEEK framework was analyzed by loading 150N axially and obliquely on the first molar, and the maximum compressive stress, minimum tensile stress and von Mises principal stress of the framework, crown, screw, implant, cortical and cancellous bone were measured and compared.
Results: Under axially loading, the von Mises stress in the monolithic zirconia and lithium silicate crowns were 361 MPa and 295 MPa, while the stress in resin and PEEK crowns were 35 MPa and 37 MPa, respectively. The screw von Mises stress of the experimental group was 694-724 MPa, which was much higher than 61 MPa of the control group.The maximum and minimum stresses of the screw appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown group. Under oblique loading,von Mises stress of the framework in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, but the maximum stress appeared in the resin crown and PEEK crown. von Mises stresses of monolic zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns in the experimental group were higher than that of resin and PEEK crowns. von Mises stress of the implant in the experimental group was twice that of the control group. von Mises stress in screw of the experimental group was much higher than that of the control group, and the maximum stress was 22 times that of the control group. The stresses of cancellous bone and cortical bone in the experimental group were twice that of the control group, and the differences were larger than that under vertical loading.
Conclusions: In order to reduce the stress of crowns,resin or PEEK materials are preferred to be used as the crown prosthesis when PEEK was framework of implant-supported fixed maxillary prosthesis. Reducing the cantilever and lateral force may avoid excessive stress in screw.
期刊介绍:
"Shanghai Journal of Stomatology (SJS)" is a comprehensive academic journal of stomatology directed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and sponsored by the Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The main columns include basic research, clinical research, column articles, clinical summaries, reviews, academic lectures, etc., which are suitable for reference by clinicians, scientific researchers and teaching personnel at all levels engaged in oral medicine.