阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的特征受发病时间的影响。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000541092
Hiroyuki Sato, Miho Ota, Ayako Kitabatake, Yuriko Numata, Takumi Takahashi, Masashi Tamura, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病和轻度认知障碍的特征受发病时间的影响。","authors":"Hiroyuki Sato, Miho Ota, Ayako Kitabatake, Yuriko Numata, Takumi Takahashi, Masashi Tamura, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai","doi":"10.1159/000541092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is higher in older people compared to younger people, dementia has also been documented in younger adults. Although early-onset dementia and late-onset dementia had been considered a single disease in pathological investigations, many studies revealed differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes between them. We evaluated differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes among the following groups: individuals with early-onset AD (EOAD), late-onset AD (LOAD), early-onset mild cognitive impairment (EOMCI), or late-onset MCI (LOMCI), and healthy controls (HCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent both a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scan and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Differences in regional gray matter volumes and MMSE subscales were investigated among the five diagnostic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the EOAD group, the LOAD group had significantly higher scores on orientation in place. Compared to the LOMCI patients, the EOMCI patients achieved significantly higher recall scores. The LOAD and LOMC groups showed significant volume reductions in bilateral medial temporal regions compared to the HCs. The EOAD and EOMCI groups did not show significant atrophy of the medial temporal region compared to the HC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hippocampal volume and memory were preserved in the patients with EOMCI or EOAD compared to those with LOMCI or LOAD. These findings may indicate that the distinct and differing patterns of neuropsychological changes between EOAD and LOAD are also common in MCI, which is intermediate between normal cognition and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":"14 1","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Sato, Miho Ota, Ayako Kitabatake, Yuriko Numata, Takumi Takahashi, Masashi Tamura, Kiyotaka Nemoto, Tetsuaki Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000541092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is higher in older people compared to younger people, dementia has also been documented in younger adults. Although early-onset dementia and late-onset dementia had been considered a single disease in pathological investigations, many studies revealed differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes between them. We evaluated differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes among the following groups: individuals with early-onset AD (EOAD), late-onset AD (LOAD), early-onset mild cognitive impairment (EOMCI), or late-onset MCI (LOMCI), and healthy controls (HCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent both a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scan and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Differences in regional gray matter volumes and MMSE subscales were investigated among the five diagnostic groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the EOAD group, the LOAD group had significantly higher scores on orientation in place. Compared to the LOMCI patients, the EOMCI patients achieved significantly higher recall scores. The LOAD and LOMC groups showed significant volume reductions in bilateral medial temporal regions compared to the HCs. The EOAD and EOMCI groups did not show significant atrophy of the medial temporal region compared to the HC group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hippocampal volume and memory were preserved in the patients with EOMCI or EOAD compared to those with LOMCI or LOAD. These findings may indicate that the distinct and differing patterns of neuropsychological changes between EOAD and LOAD are also common in MCI, which is intermediate between normal cognition and AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"81-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介虽然阿尔茨海默病(AD)在老年人中的发病率高于年轻人,但在年轻人中也有痴呆症的记录。虽然在病理研究中,早发性痴呆症和晚发性痴呆症被认为是同一种疾病,但许多研究揭示了这两种疾病在认知和神经影像学变化上的差异。我们评估了以下群体在认知和神经影像学变化方面的差异:早发 AD(EOAD)、晚发 AD(LOAD)、早发轻度认知障碍(EOMCI)或晚发 MCI(LOMCI)患者,以及健康对照组(HCs):患者同时接受 1.5 特斯拉磁共振成像扫描和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)。结果:与 EOAD 组相比,MMSE 组患者的灰质体积更小,而 EOAD 组患者的灰质体积更大:结果:与EOAD组相比,LOAD组在原地定向方面的得分明显更高。与 LOMCI 患者相比,EOMCI 患者的回忆得分明显更高。与HCs相比,LOAD组和LOMC组的双侧颞内侧区域体积明显缩小。与HC组相比,EOAD组和EOMCI组的内侧颞区并未出现明显萎缩:结论:与LOMCI或LOAD患者相比,EOMCI或EOAD患者的海马体积和记忆力均有所保留。这些发现可能表明,EOAD和LOAD之间不同的神经心理学变化模式在介于正常认知和AD之间的MCI中也很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset.

Introduction: Although the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is higher in older people compared to younger people, dementia has also been documented in younger adults. Although early-onset dementia and late-onset dementia had been considered a single disease in pathological investigations, many studies revealed differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes between them. We evaluated differences in cognitive and neuroimaging changes among the following groups: individuals with early-onset AD (EOAD), late-onset AD (LOAD), early-onset mild cognitive impairment (EOMCI), or late-onset MCI (LOMCI), and healthy controls (HCs).

Methods: Patients underwent both a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scan and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Differences in regional gray matter volumes and MMSE subscales were investigated among the five diagnostic groups.

Results: Compared to the EOAD group, the LOAD group had significantly higher scores on orientation in place. Compared to the LOMCI patients, the EOMCI patients achieved significantly higher recall scores. The LOAD and LOMC groups showed significant volume reductions in bilateral medial temporal regions compared to the HCs. The EOAD and EOMCI groups did not show significant atrophy of the medial temporal region compared to the HC group.

Conclusions: The hippocampal volume and memory were preserved in the patients with EOMCI or EOAD compared to those with LOMCI or LOAD. These findings may indicate that the distinct and differing patterns of neuropsychological changes between EOAD and LOAD are also common in MCI, which is intermediate between normal cognition and AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
期刊最新文献
The Development of an Intradisciplinary Staff Training Intervention on the Optimal Management of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia: A Qualitative Study. Fear of Dementia among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Germany. Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset. Prevalence of Geriatric Syndromes among Older Outpatients with Dementia. Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1