认知功能评分与修订版长谷川痴呆量表以及卧床不起等级与巴特尔指数和卡茨指数的标准相关有效性:一项多中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Pub Date : 2024-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000540430
Risa Hirata, Naoko E Katsuki, Hitomi Shimada, Eiji Nakatani, Kiyoshi Shikino, Maiko Ono, Chihiro Saito, Kaori Amari, Kazuya Kurogi, Mariko Yoshimura, Tomoyo Nishi, Shizuka Yaita, Yoshimasa Oda, Midori Tokushima, Yuka Hirakawa, Masahiko Nakamura, Shun Yamashita, Yoshinori Tokushima, Hidetoshi Aihara, Motoshi Fujiwara, Masaki Tago
{"title":"认知功能评分与修订版长谷川痴呆量表以及卧床不起等级与巴特尔指数和卡茨指数的标准相关有效性:一项多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Risa Hirata, Naoko E Katsuki, Hitomi Shimada, Eiji Nakatani, Kiyoshi Shikino, Maiko Ono, Chihiro Saito, Kaori Amari, Kazuya Kurogi, Mariko Yoshimura, Tomoyo Nishi, Shizuka Yaita, Yoshimasa Oda, Midori Tokushima, Yuka Hirakawa, Masahiko Nakamura, Shun Yamashita, Yoshinori Tokushima, Hidetoshi Aihara, Motoshi Fujiwara, Masaki Tago","doi":"10.1159/000540430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cognitive function score (CFS) is a public scale for assessing the activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults with dementia in Japan. In contrast, the scores of the revised Hasegawa's dementia scale (HDS-R), an easy-to-use dementia screening tool developed in Japan, are significantly correlated with mini-mental state examination scores and are widely utilized in various countries. This novel study aimed to elucidate the previously unexplored criterion-related validity of the CFS and HDS-R and the Bedriddenness Rank (BR), Barthel index (BI), and Katz index (KI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective study and a secondary analysis of our previous study. The study included patients aged ≥20 years hospitalized in chronic care settings between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021. We collected data from medical charts on admission, including age, sex, the BR, CFS, BI, KI, and HDS-R scores. Correlations between the CFS and HDS-R score, as well as between the BR and BI or KI, were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 749 participants were included in the analysis of criterion-related validity between the CFS and HDS-R. In the CFS cohort analysis, 202 patients (27.0%) were categorized as having a normal CFS, and the median HDS-R score was 18 (range: 6-26). The correlation coefficient between the CFS and HDS-R scores was -0.834 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between BR and BI was -0.741 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), BR and KI was -0.740 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CFS revealed significant criterion-related validity compared with the established cognitive assessment scale, the HDS-R. The BR also demonstrated significant criterion-related validity with the BI and KI.</p>","PeriodicalId":38017,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Risa Hirata, Naoko E Katsuki, Hitomi Shimada, Eiji Nakatani, Kiyoshi Shikino, Maiko Ono, Chihiro Saito, Kaori Amari, Kazuya Kurogi, Mariko Yoshimura, Tomoyo Nishi, Shizuka Yaita, Yoshimasa Oda, Midori Tokushima, Yuka Hirakawa, Masahiko Nakamura, Shun Yamashita, Yoshinori Tokushima, Hidetoshi Aihara, Motoshi Fujiwara, Masaki Tago\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The cognitive function score (CFS) is a public scale for assessing the activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults with dementia in Japan. In contrast, the scores of the revised Hasegawa's dementia scale (HDS-R), an easy-to-use dementia screening tool developed in Japan, are significantly correlated with mini-mental state examination scores and are widely utilized in various countries. This novel study aimed to elucidate the previously unexplored criterion-related validity of the CFS and HDS-R and the Bedriddenness Rank (BR), Barthel index (BI), and Katz index (KI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective study and a secondary analysis of our previous study. The study included patients aged ≥20 years hospitalized in chronic care settings between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021. We collected data from medical charts on admission, including age, sex, the BR, CFS, BI, KI, and HDS-R scores. Correlations between the CFS and HDS-R score, as well as between the BR and BI or KI, were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 749 participants were included in the analysis of criterion-related validity between the CFS and HDS-R. In the CFS cohort analysis, 202 patients (27.0%) were categorized as having a normal CFS, and the median HDS-R score was 18 (range: 6-26). The correlation coefficient between the CFS and HDS-R scores was -0.834 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between BR and BI was -0.741 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), BR and KI was -0.740 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CFS revealed significant criterion-related validity compared with the established cognitive assessment scale, the HDS-R. The BR also demonstrated significant criterion-related validity with the BI and KI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介认知功能评分(CFS)是日本用于评估老年痴呆症患者日常生活活动能力(ADL)的公共量表。相比之下,修订版长谷川痴呆量表(HDS-R)是日本开发的一种易于使用的痴呆筛查工具,其得分与迷你精神状态检查得分显著相关,并在各国广泛使用。这项新研究旨在阐明 CFS 和 HDS-R 与 Bedriddenness Rank (BR)、Barthel index (BI) 和 Katz index (KI) 标准相关的有效性:这是一项多中心回顾性研究,也是对我们之前研究的二次分析。研究对象包括2018年4月1日至2021年3月31日期间在慢性病护理机构住院的年龄≥20岁的患者。我们从入院时的病历中收集了数据,包括年龄、性别、BR、CFS、BI、KI 和 HDS-R 评分。我们使用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分析了CFS和HDS-R评分之间以及BR和BI或KI之间的相关性:共有 749 名参与者参与了 CFS 和 HDS-R 标准相关有效性分析。在CFS队列分析中,有202名患者(27.0%)被归类为正常CFS,HDS-R评分的中位数为18分(范围:6-26)。CFS和HDS-R评分之间的相关系数为-0.834(p < 0.001)。BR与BI的相关系数为-0.741(P < 0.001),BR与KI的相关系数为-0.740(P < 0.001):与已有的认知评估量表(HDS-R)相比,CFS具有明显的标准相关有效性。与 BI 和 KI 相比,BR 也显示出明显的标准相关有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Introduction: The cognitive function score (CFS) is a public scale for assessing the activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults with dementia in Japan. In contrast, the scores of the revised Hasegawa's dementia scale (HDS-R), an easy-to-use dementia screening tool developed in Japan, are significantly correlated with mini-mental state examination scores and are widely utilized in various countries. This novel study aimed to elucidate the previously unexplored criterion-related validity of the CFS and HDS-R and the Bedriddenness Rank (BR), Barthel index (BI), and Katz index (KI).

Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective study and a secondary analysis of our previous study. The study included patients aged ≥20 years hospitalized in chronic care settings between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021. We collected data from medical charts on admission, including age, sex, the BR, CFS, BI, KI, and HDS-R scores. Correlations between the CFS and HDS-R score, as well as between the BR and BI or KI, were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

Results: A total of 749 participants were included in the analysis of criterion-related validity between the CFS and HDS-R. In the CFS cohort analysis, 202 patients (27.0%) were categorized as having a normal CFS, and the median HDS-R score was 18 (range: 6-26). The correlation coefficient between the CFS and HDS-R scores was -0.834 (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between BR and BI was -0.741 (p < 0.001), BR and KI was -0.740 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The CFS revealed significant criterion-related validity compared with the established cognitive assessment scale, the HDS-R. The BR also demonstrated significant criterion-related validity with the BI and KI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of cognitive dysfunction such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra .
期刊最新文献
Fear of Dementia among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Germany. Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment Influenced by the Time of Onset. Prevalence of Geriatric Syndromes among Older Outpatients with Dementia. Criterion-Related Validity of the Cognitive Function Score with the Revised Hasegawa's Dementia Scale and the Bedriddenness Rank with the Barthel Index and the Katz Index: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study. What’s new in dementia risk prediction modelling? An updated systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1