[多发性硬化症指南推荐标准化工具:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的内容比较分析]。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Nervenarzt Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z
Jasmin Bolte, Elise-Marie Dilger, Anna Levke Brütt
{"title":"[多发性硬化症指南推荐标准化工具:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的内容比较分析]。","authors":"Jasmin Bolte, Elise-Marie Dilger, Anna Levke Brütt","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines serve as practice-based decision support and recommend the use of standardized instruments to measure functional capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the extent to which a person's functioning is captured by these instruments is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to link the content of the MS disease guideline with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to capture the distribution of the content on the functional domains and contextual factors and to uncover existing gaps.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Instruments of the S2k guideline \"Diagnosis and therapy of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated diseases\", which were available free of charge in German or English and designed for adult people, were included. The instruments were classified into their meaningful concepts (meaningful concepts = MCs) and subsequently coded using standardized ICF rules by two raters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 included instruments contained 351 items and 718 MCs. Of these, 663 MCs could be linked to the ICF according to the coding rules. Of these, 51% (340 MCs) related to body functions, 44% (291 MCs) to the activity and participation component, and 5% (32 MCs) to environmental factors. The most frequently coded chapter was mobility (d4) with 201 MCs. Interrater agreement was k = 0.79.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The linking of the guideline-recommended instruments to the ICF shows that the instruments cover different themes. The area of environmental factors is underrepresented. The ICF linkage reveals a broad spectrum of functioning covered by the guideline-recommended instruments and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for the affected persons.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Guideline-recommended standardized instruments in multiple sclerosis : A comparative content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)].\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Bolte, Elise-Marie Dilger, Anna Levke Brütt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines serve as practice-based decision support and recommend the use of standardized instruments to measure functional capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the extent to which a person's functioning is captured by these instruments is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to link the content of the MS disease guideline with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to capture the distribution of the content on the functional domains and contextual factors and to uncover existing gaps.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Instruments of the S2k guideline \\\"Diagnosis and therapy of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated diseases\\\", which were available free of charge in German or English and designed for adult people, were included. The instruments were classified into their meaningful concepts (meaningful concepts = MCs) and subsequently coded using standardized ICF rules by two raters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 23 included instruments contained 351 items and 718 MCs. Of these, 663 MCs could be linked to the ICF according to the coding rules. Of these, 51% (340 MCs) related to body functions, 44% (291 MCs) to the activity and participation component, and 5% (32 MCs) to environmental factors. The most frequently coded chapter was mobility (d4) with 201 MCs. Interrater agreement was k = 0.79.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The linking of the guideline-recommended instruments to the ICF shows that the instruments cover different themes. The area of environmental factors is underrepresented. The ICF linkage reveals a broad spectrum of functioning covered by the guideline-recommended instruments and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for the affected persons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nervenarzt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:指南作为基于实践的决策支持,建议使用标准化工具测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者的功能能力。然而,这些工具能在多大程度上反映患者的功能尚不清楚:本研究旨在将多发性硬化症疾病指南的内容与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)联系起来,以了解这些内容在功能领域和环境因素上的分布情况,并发现存在的差距:纳入了 S2k 指南 "多发性硬化症、神经性脊髓炎视网膜频谱疾病和 MOG-IgG 相关疾病的诊断与治疗 "中的工具,这些工具有免费的德语版或英语版,专为成年人设计。这些工具被归类为有意义的概念(有意义的概念 = MCs),随后由两名评定员使用标准化的 ICF 规则进行编码:结果:纳入的 23 种工具包含 351 个项目和 718 个有意义概念。结果:纳入的 23 种工具包含 351 个项目和 718 个 MCs,其中 663 个 MCs 可根据编码规则与 ICF 建立联系。其中,51%(340 个 MC)与身体功能有关,44%(291 个 MC)与活动和参与部分有关,5%(32 个 MC)与环境因素有关。编码最多的章节是活动能力(d4),共有 201 个 MCs。相互之间的一致性为 k = 0.79:讨论:将指南推荐的工具与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》联系起来显示,这些工具涵盖了不同的主题。环境因素领域的代表性不足。将《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》与指南推荐工具联系起来,可以发现指南推荐工具所涵盖的功能范围很广,有助于为受影响者选择合适的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Guideline-recommended standardized instruments in multiple sclerosis : A comparative content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)].

Background: Guidelines serve as practice-based decision support and recommend the use of standardized instruments to measure functional capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the extent to which a person's functioning is captured by these instruments is unclear.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to link the content of the MS disease guideline with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to capture the distribution of the content on the functional domains and contextual factors and to uncover existing gaps.

Materials and methods: Instruments of the S2k guideline "Diagnosis and therapy of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated diseases", which were available free of charge in German or English and designed for adult people, were included. The instruments were classified into their meaningful concepts (meaningful concepts = MCs) and subsequently coded using standardized ICF rules by two raters.

Results: The 23 included instruments contained 351 items and 718 MCs. Of these, 663 MCs could be linked to the ICF according to the coding rules. Of these, 51% (340 MCs) related to body functions, 44% (291 MCs) to the activity and participation component, and 5% (32 MCs) to environmental factors. The most frequently coded chapter was mobility (d4) with 201 MCs. Interrater agreement was k = 0.79.

Discussion: The linking of the guideline-recommended instruments to the ICF shows that the instruments cover different themes. The area of environmental factors is underrepresented. The ICF linkage reveals a broad spectrum of functioning covered by the guideline-recommended instruments and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for the affected persons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[Involvement of representatives of patients and relatives in guideline processes : S3 guidelines on psychosocial therapies for severe mental illnesses breaks new ground]. [Cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenic psychoses : Diagnostics, course and therapy]. [Neurorehabilitation]. [Parenthood and mental diseases]. [Goodbye-Valued members of the German Society for Neurology].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1