人性化的神经心理学评估:移情的作用。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890
Kevin-Marc Valery, Adrien Seguela, Meryl Caiada, Justine Dubos, Alexia Ducasse, Justine Duffa, Chloé Dumora, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Mathilde Guillet, Sarah Guionnet, Manon Laumier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Maika Violet, Antoinette Prouteau
{"title":"人性化的神经心理学评估:移情的作用。","authors":"Kevin-Marc Valery, Adrien Seguela, Meryl Caiada, Justine Dubos, Alexia Ducasse, Justine Duffa, Chloé Dumora, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Mathilde Guillet, Sarah Guionnet, Manon Laumier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Maika Violet, Antoinette Prouteau","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Recent research and the majority of neuropsychological testing manuals emphasize the importance of establishing a proper relationship between the evaluator and the evaluatee. However, there is relatively little empirical research on this point.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to operationalize empathy in the evaluator/evaluatee relationship during neuropsychological assessment. The subsequent aim was to determine the impact of this empathy on the evaluator/evaluatee relationship and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants, designated as \"evaluatees\", were randomly assigned to complete a brief neuropsychological test in either an empathic (N = 47) or neutral condition (N = 47). The neuropsychological tests included the Stroop task from the GREFEX battery, the Letter-Number Sequencing from the WAIS-IV, and the d2 test of attention. Following the tests, participants completed scales indicating perceived relationship with the evaluator, lived experience of the test, and sociodemographic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The manipulation check indicated that it was possible to manipulate empathy. Evaluators demonstrating empathy led to a better evaluator/evaluatee relationship. However, the results regarding cognitive performance were less consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, there is a need for improvement in clinical neuropsychological practice with regard to relational competencies during testing. This study proposes benchmarks to make the evaluator's empathy perceptible. This technique has not been shown to have a consistent effect on cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humanizing neuropsychological assessment: The role of empathy.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin-Marc Valery, Adrien Seguela, Meryl Caiada, Justine Dubos, Alexia Ducasse, Justine Duffa, Chloé Dumora, Simon Felix, Thomas Fournier, Mathilde Guillet, Sarah Guionnet, Manon Laumier, Emma Tison, Louis Violeau, Maika Violet, Antoinette Prouteau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Recent research and the majority of neuropsychological testing manuals emphasize the importance of establishing a proper relationship between the evaluator and the evaluatee. However, there is relatively little empirical research on this point.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to operationalize empathy in the evaluator/evaluatee relationship during neuropsychological assessment. The subsequent aim was to determine the impact of this empathy on the evaluator/evaluatee relationship and cognitive performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants, designated as \\\"evaluatees\\\", were randomly assigned to complete a brief neuropsychological test in either an empathic (N = 47) or neutral condition (N = 47). The neuropsychological tests included the Stroop task from the GREFEX battery, the Letter-Number Sequencing from the WAIS-IV, and the d2 test of attention. Following the tests, participants completed scales indicating perceived relationship with the evaluator, lived experience of the test, and sociodemographic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The manipulation check indicated that it was possible to manipulate empathy. Evaluators demonstrating empathy led to a better evaluator/evaluatee relationship. However, the results regarding cognitive performance were less consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, there is a need for improvement in clinical neuropsychological practice with regard to relational competencies during testing. This study proposes benchmarks to make the evaluator's empathy perceptible. This technique has not been shown to have a consistent effect on cognitive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2420890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的研究和大多数神经心理测试手册都强调了在评估者和被评估者之间建立适当关系的重要性。然而,关于这一点的实证研究却相对较少:本研究的目的是在神经心理评估过程中,将评估者与被评估者之间的移情关系操作化。随后的目的是确定这种共情对评估者/被评估者关系和认知表现的影响:被称为 "被评估者 "的参与者被随机分配到移情状态(47 人)或中立状态(47 人)下完成简短的神经心理学测试。神经心理学测试包括 GREFEX 测试中的 Stroop 任务、WAIS-IV 中的字母-数字排序以及 d2 注意力测试。测试结束后,受试者填写了与评估者关系、测试体验和社会人口学信息的量表:操纵检查结果表明,移情是可以操纵的。评价者表现出同理心会使评价者与被评价者的关系更好。然而,认知表现方面的结果却不太一致:总之,临床神经心理学实践中需要改进测试过程中的关系能力。本研究提出了使评估者的移情可以被感知的基准。这一技术尚未被证明对认知表现有一致的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Humanizing neuropsychological assessment: The role of empathy.

Context: Recent research and the majority of neuropsychological testing manuals emphasize the importance of establishing a proper relationship between the evaluator and the evaluatee. However, there is relatively little empirical research on this point.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to operationalize empathy in the evaluator/evaluatee relationship during neuropsychological assessment. The subsequent aim was to determine the impact of this empathy on the evaluator/evaluatee relationship and cognitive performance.

Methods: The participants, designated as "evaluatees", were randomly assigned to complete a brief neuropsychological test in either an empathic (N = 47) or neutral condition (N = 47). The neuropsychological tests included the Stroop task from the GREFEX battery, the Letter-Number Sequencing from the WAIS-IV, and the d2 test of attention. Following the tests, participants completed scales indicating perceived relationship with the evaluator, lived experience of the test, and sociodemographic information.

Results: The manipulation check indicated that it was possible to manipulate empathy. Evaluators demonstrating empathy led to a better evaluator/evaluatee relationship. However, the results regarding cognitive performance were less consistent.

Conclusions: In conclusion, there is a need for improvement in clinical neuropsychological practice with regard to relational competencies during testing. This study proposes benchmarks to make the evaluator's empathy perceptible. This technique has not been shown to have a consistent effect on cognitive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults. Test of memory Malingering 2nd Edition: Normative data from cognitively intact adults living in Spain. Depressive symptoms in Brazilian Parkinson's disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: A Cross-Sectional study. Goal attainment in individual and group-based neuropsychological interventions for young adults with dyslexia in a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive processing differences between stereotype activation and semantic activation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1