患者语言并不影响全膝关节置换术后的操作需求

David M Ramsden, Nicholas R Pagani, Jordan A Santiago, Mariano E Menendez, Michael D Baratz, Matthew J Salzler
{"title":"患者语言并不影响全膝关节置换术后的操作需求","authors":"David M Ramsden, Nicholas R Pagani, Jordan A Santiago, Mariano E Menendez, Michael D Baratz, Matthew J Salzler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socioeconomic factors have been associated with an increased need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of MUA and range of motion (ROM) following primary TKA in English and non-English-speaking patients. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all primary TKAs performed at their institution between 2010 and 2017. A total of 1,099 English-speaking and 163 non-English-speaking patients were included. There was no significant difference in rate of MUA (3.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.392) or postoperative ROM (102.2 vs. 100°, p = 0.142) between English and non-English-speaking patients. Younger age (p = 0.001) and female sex (p = 0.005), but not patient language, were associated with need for MUA. Patient language does not appear to impact the rate of MUA or ROM following TKA. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):158-161, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Language Does Not Impact Need for Manipulation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"David M Ramsden, Nicholas R Pagani, Jordan A Santiago, Mariano E Menendez, Michael D Baratz, Matthew J Salzler\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Socioeconomic factors have been associated with an increased need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of MUA and range of motion (ROM) following primary TKA in English and non-English-speaking patients. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all primary TKAs performed at their institution between 2010 and 2017. A total of 1,099 English-speaking and 163 non-English-speaking patients were included. There was no significant difference in rate of MUA (3.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.392) or postoperative ROM (102.2 vs. 100°, p = 0.142) between English and non-English-speaking patients. Younger age (p = 0.001) and female sex (p = 0.005), but not patient language, were associated with need for MUA. Patient language does not appear to impact the rate of MUA or ROM following TKA. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):158-161, 2024).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会经济因素与全膝关节置换术(TKA)后麻醉下操作(MUA)需求增加有关。本研究的目的是比较英语和非英语患者在初级 TKA 术后的 MUA 率和活动范围 (ROM)。作者对其所在机构在 2010 年至 2017 年期间实施的所有初级 TKA 进行了一项回顾性队列研究。共纳入了 1,099 名英语患者和 163 名非英语患者。英语和非英语患者的MUA率(3.5 vs. 4.9%,p = 0.392)或术后ROM(102.2 vs. 100°,p = 0.142)无明显差异。年龄(p = 0.001)和性别(p = 0.005)与是否需要 MUA 有关,但与患者语言无关。患者的语言似乎不会影响 TKA 术后的 MUA 或 ROM 率。(外科骨科进展杂志》33(3):158-161,2024)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Language Does Not Impact Need for Manipulation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Socioeconomic factors have been associated with an increased need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of MUA and range of motion (ROM) following primary TKA in English and non-English-speaking patients. The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all primary TKAs performed at their institution between 2010 and 2017. A total of 1,099 English-speaking and 163 non-English-speaking patients were included. There was no significant difference in rate of MUA (3.5 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.392) or postoperative ROM (102.2 vs. 100°, p = 0.142) between English and non-English-speaking patients. Younger age (p = 0.001) and female sex (p = 0.005), but not patient language, were associated with need for MUA. Patient language does not appear to impact the rate of MUA or ROM following TKA. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(3):158-161, 2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incidence of Urinary Retention Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adolescent and Pediatric Scoliosis at a Single Academic Center: Is There a Role for Prophylactic Tamsulosin? Indirect Coronal Reduction Technique Using a Volar Locking Plate in Distal Radius Fractures: A Case Series. Major Metropolitan Area COVID-19 - Positive Patients Undergoing Emergency and Elective Orthopaedic Surgeries: A Case-matched Control Study. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Increased Body Mass Associated with Decreased Bracing Outcomes. Fluoroscopy and Radiographs for Detecting Retained Surgical Needles in the Hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1