比较超宽带微波系统和超声波在活牛身上的应用,以预测牛肉胴体皮下脂肪含量

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Meat Science Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109694
J. Marimuthu , K.M.W. Loudon , L.J. Smith , G.E. Gardner
{"title":"比较超宽带微波系统和超声波在活牛身上的应用,以预测牛肉胴体皮下脂肪含量","authors":"J. Marimuthu ,&nbsp;K.M.W. Loudon ,&nbsp;L.J. Smith ,&nbsp;G.E. Gardner","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultrasound and ultrawide band microwave system (MiS) were directly compared in their ability to scan live cattle to predict carcase traits. Commercial beef cattle (<em>n</em> = 315) were scanned on farm 0–14 days prior to slaughter. Traits measured were subcutaneous fatness at the P8 site (over the gluteus muscle on the rump, at the intersection of a line through the pin bone parallel to the chine and perpendicular through the 3rd sacral crest) and subcutaneous fatness at the rib fat site (between 12th &amp; 13th rib, ¾ of the length ventrally over the longissimus muscle). The precision of prediction of carcase traits was slightly better using MiS. MiS prediction of P8 fat depth had an average RMSEP of 2.48 mm and R2 of 0.65. The MiS could predict carcase rib fat with an average RMSEP of 2.28 mm and R2 of 0.56. The accuracy of prediction was very similar between the two technologies. When predicting P8, the average bias was smallest using MiS at 0.157 mm, but the average slope was smallest using ultrasound at 0.03 mm. When predicting rib fat, MiS had the smallest average bias at 0.204 mm, and smallest average slope deviation at 0.06 mm. The MiS predicted P8 and rib fat carcase traits with similar precision and accuracy as ultrasound.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 109694"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ultra-wide band microwave system and ultrasound in live cattle to predict beef carcase subcutaneous fatness\",\"authors\":\"J. Marimuthu ,&nbsp;K.M.W. Loudon ,&nbsp;L.J. Smith ,&nbsp;G.E. Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ultrasound and ultrawide band microwave system (MiS) were directly compared in their ability to scan live cattle to predict carcase traits. Commercial beef cattle (<em>n</em> = 315) were scanned on farm 0–14 days prior to slaughter. Traits measured were subcutaneous fatness at the P8 site (over the gluteus muscle on the rump, at the intersection of a line through the pin bone parallel to the chine and perpendicular through the 3rd sacral crest) and subcutaneous fatness at the rib fat site (between 12th &amp; 13th rib, ¾ of the length ventrally over the longissimus muscle). The precision of prediction of carcase traits was slightly better using MiS. MiS prediction of P8 fat depth had an average RMSEP of 2.48 mm and R2 of 0.65. The MiS could predict carcase rib fat with an average RMSEP of 2.28 mm and R2 of 0.56. The accuracy of prediction was very similar between the two technologies. When predicting P8, the average bias was smallest using MiS at 0.157 mm, but the average slope was smallest using ultrasound at 0.03 mm. When predicting rib fat, MiS had the smallest average bias at 0.204 mm, and smallest average slope deviation at 0.06 mm. The MiS predicted P8 and rib fat carcase traits with similar precision and accuracy as ultrasound.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Science\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002717\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002717","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接比较了超声波和超宽带微波系统(MiS)扫描活牛以预测胴体特征的能力。屠宰前 0-14 天在农场对商品肉牛(n = 315)进行扫描。测量的性状是 P8 点皮下脂肪含量(臀部臀肌上方,平行于脊柱的针骨与垂直于第 3 骶骨嵴的连线交点处)和肋骨脂肪点皮下脂肪含量(第 12 和amp 之间;第 13 肋骨,腹侧长肌上方长度的 3/4)。使用 MiS 预测胴体性状的精度略高。MiS预测P8脂肪深度的平均RMSEP为2.48毫米,R2为0.65。MiS 预测胴体肋骨脂肪的平均 RMSEP 为 2.28 毫米,R2 为 0.56。两种技术的预测准确度非常接近。在预测 P8 时,MiS 的平均偏差最小,为 0.157 毫米,而超声波的平均斜率最小,为 0.03 毫米。在预测肋骨脂肪时,MiS 的平均偏差最小,为 0.204 毫米,平均斜率偏差最小,为 0.06 毫米。MiS 预测 P8 和肋脂胴体性状的精度和准确度与超声波相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of ultra-wide band microwave system and ultrasound in live cattle to predict beef carcase subcutaneous fatness
Ultrasound and ultrawide band microwave system (MiS) were directly compared in their ability to scan live cattle to predict carcase traits. Commercial beef cattle (n = 315) were scanned on farm 0–14 days prior to slaughter. Traits measured were subcutaneous fatness at the P8 site (over the gluteus muscle on the rump, at the intersection of a line through the pin bone parallel to the chine and perpendicular through the 3rd sacral crest) and subcutaneous fatness at the rib fat site (between 12th & 13th rib, ¾ of the length ventrally over the longissimus muscle). The precision of prediction of carcase traits was slightly better using MiS. MiS prediction of P8 fat depth had an average RMSEP of 2.48 mm and R2 of 0.65. The MiS could predict carcase rib fat with an average RMSEP of 2.28 mm and R2 of 0.56. The accuracy of prediction was very similar between the two technologies. When predicting P8, the average bias was smallest using MiS at 0.157 mm, but the average slope was smallest using ultrasound at 0.03 mm. When predicting rib fat, MiS had the smallest average bias at 0.204 mm, and smallest average slope deviation at 0.06 mm. The MiS predicted P8 and rib fat carcase traits with similar precision and accuracy as ultrasound.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
期刊最新文献
The improved gel properties of myofibrillar protein under low salt condition by ultrasound-assisted sodium tripolyphosphate. The construction of a sheepmeat eating quality prediction model for Australian lamb. Investigating flavor and quality characteristics in Chinese bacon from different regions using integrated GC-IMS, electronic sensory assessment, and sensory analysis Simultaneous monitoring of two comprehensive quality evaluation indexes of frozen-thawed beef meatballs using hyperspectral imaging and multi-task convolutional neural network Impacts of carob pulp (Ceratonia siliqua L.) and vitamin E on pork colour, oxidative stability, lipid composition and microbial growth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1