加拿大北极地区消除结核病的机遇:在北极偏远社区开展全社区筛查的成本效益

IF 7 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Lancet Regional Health-Americas Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100916
Alice Zwerling , Edwina Veerasingam , Ellen Snyder , Andrea Schertzer , Keith Travers , Carolyn Pim , Chris Pease , Sandy Finn , Linette McElroy , Jean Allen , Mike Patterson , Gonzalo G. Alvarez
{"title":"加拿大北极地区消除结核病的机遇:在北极偏远社区开展全社区筛查的成本效益","authors":"Alice Zwerling ,&nbsp;Edwina Veerasingam ,&nbsp;Ellen Snyder ,&nbsp;Andrea Schertzer ,&nbsp;Keith Travers ,&nbsp;Carolyn Pim ,&nbsp;Chris Pease ,&nbsp;Sandy Finn ,&nbsp;Linette McElroy ,&nbsp;Jean Allen ,&nbsp;Mike Patterson ,&nbsp;Gonzalo G. Alvarez","doi":"10.1016/j.lana.2024.100916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In response to a tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in the remote community of Qikiqtarjuaq Nunavut, Canada, community leaders and the territorial government initiated community-wide screening (CWS) for tuberculosis, an expensive undertaking given the high cost of providing medical services in the Canadian arctic. Our study aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Qikiqtarjuaq CWS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a hybrid decision analysis and Markov model to replicate the experience and extrapolate CWS outcomes over a 20-year time horizon. Following a hypothetical cohort with patient characteristics reflecting the demographic and testing data available from the CWS, the model compared a one-time CWS intervention with the reference case of ‘no community-wide screening’.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>CWS resulted in improved health gains through prevention of active tuberculosis cases compared with no CWS. It also resulted in increased costs (measured in Canadian dollars), with a very low estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25.10 (95% URs: cost savings-$15,874) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with current standard of care approach (no CWS). Community-wide screening in this context would be considered highly cost-effective in this setting. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, we found &gt;99% of iterations were cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>While costly, coordinated and intensive community-wide tuberculosis screening activities are highly cost-effective in remote arctic communities when utilized in an outbreak context.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Government of Nunavut.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100916"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunities for tuberculosis elimination in the Canadian Arctic: cost-effectiveness of community-wide screening in a remote Arctic community\",\"authors\":\"Alice Zwerling ,&nbsp;Edwina Veerasingam ,&nbsp;Ellen Snyder ,&nbsp;Andrea Schertzer ,&nbsp;Keith Travers ,&nbsp;Carolyn Pim ,&nbsp;Chris Pease ,&nbsp;Sandy Finn ,&nbsp;Linette McElroy ,&nbsp;Jean Allen ,&nbsp;Mike Patterson ,&nbsp;Gonzalo G. Alvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lana.2024.100916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In response to a tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in the remote community of Qikiqtarjuaq Nunavut, Canada, community leaders and the territorial government initiated community-wide screening (CWS) for tuberculosis, an expensive undertaking given the high cost of providing medical services in the Canadian arctic. Our study aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Qikiqtarjuaq CWS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a hybrid decision analysis and Markov model to replicate the experience and extrapolate CWS outcomes over a 20-year time horizon. Following a hypothetical cohort with patient characteristics reflecting the demographic and testing data available from the CWS, the model compared a one-time CWS intervention with the reference case of ‘no community-wide screening’.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>CWS resulted in improved health gains through prevention of active tuberculosis cases compared with no CWS. It also resulted in increased costs (measured in Canadian dollars), with a very low estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25.10 (95% URs: cost savings-$15,874) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with current standard of care approach (no CWS). Community-wide screening in this context would be considered highly cost-effective in this setting. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, we found &gt;99% of iterations were cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>While costly, coordinated and intensive community-wide tuberculosis screening activities are highly cost-effective in remote arctic communities when utilized in an outbreak context.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>Government of Nunavut.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100916\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Regional Health-Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667193X24002436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景针对加拿大努纳武特地区偏远社区 Qikiqtarjuaq 爆发的结核病(TB)疫情,社区领导和地区政府启动了全社区结核病筛查(CWS),由于在加拿大北极地区提供医疗服务的成本高昂,这项工作耗资巨大。我们的研究目的是评估 Qikiqtarjuaq CWS 的成本效益。方法我们开发了一个混合决策分析和马尔可夫模型,以复制经验并推断 20 年时间范围内的 CWS 结果。该模型以一个假定的队列为基础,患者特征反映了 CWS 所提供的人口统计和检测数据,并将一次性 CWS 干预与 "无社区范围筛查 "的参考情况进行了比较。与目前的标准护理方法(不进行社区卫生服务)相比,该方法也增加了成本(以加元计算),估计增量成本效益比为 25.10 加元(95% URs:节约成本-15,874 加元)。在这种情况下,全社区筛查被认为具有很高的成本效益。在概率敏感性分析中,我们发现在 50,000 美元/QALY 收益的支付意愿阈值下,99% 的迭代具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Opportunities for tuberculosis elimination in the Canadian Arctic: cost-effectiveness of community-wide screening in a remote Arctic community

Background

In response to a tuberculosis (TB) outbreak in the remote community of Qikiqtarjuaq Nunavut, Canada, community leaders and the territorial government initiated community-wide screening (CWS) for tuberculosis, an expensive undertaking given the high cost of providing medical services in the Canadian arctic. Our study aim was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Qikiqtarjuaq CWS.

Methods

We developed a hybrid decision analysis and Markov model to replicate the experience and extrapolate CWS outcomes over a 20-year time horizon. Following a hypothetical cohort with patient characteristics reflecting the demographic and testing data available from the CWS, the model compared a one-time CWS intervention with the reference case of ‘no community-wide screening’.

Findings

CWS resulted in improved health gains through prevention of active tuberculosis cases compared with no CWS. It also resulted in increased costs (measured in Canadian dollars), with a very low estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $25.10 (95% URs: cost savings-$15,874) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with current standard of care approach (no CWS). Community-wide screening in this context would be considered highly cost-effective in this setting. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, we found >99% of iterations were cost-effective at a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained.

Interpretation

While costly, coordinated and intensive community-wide tuberculosis screening activities are highly cost-effective in remote arctic communities when utilized in an outbreak context.

Funding

Government of Nunavut.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, an open-access journal, contributes to The Lancet's global initiative by focusing on health-care quality and access in the Americas. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the region, promoting better health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating change or shedding light on clinical practice and health policy. It welcomes submissions on various regional health topics, including infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, emergency care, health policy, and health equity.
期刊最新文献
Health care utilization and cost implications of Chile's 2024 nirsevimab strategy for RSV prevention: a counterfactual analysis Benefits and harms of lung cancer screening strategies in Argentina: a modeling study Assessment of fatal cardiovascular disease risk using data-driven diabetes subgroups and SCORE2-Diabetes: a prospective, observational, population-based analysis of adults with diabetes in Mexico City When evidence meets artificial intelligence A novel maternal prenatal risk index to predict mortality-weighted severe maternal morbidity at hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1