解决长期水热调度问题的自适应随机方法

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124730
Caio Nogueira Chaves , Tiago Forti da Silva , João Paulo Manarelli Gaspar , André Christóvão Pio Martins , Edilaine Martins Soler , Antonio Roberto Balbo , Leonardo Nepomuceno
{"title":"解决长期水热调度问题的自适应随机方法","authors":"Caio Nogueira Chaves ,&nbsp;Tiago Forti da Silva ,&nbsp;João Paulo Manarelli Gaspar ,&nbsp;André Christóvão Pio Martins ,&nbsp;Edilaine Martins Soler ,&nbsp;Antonio Roberto Balbo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Nepomuceno","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The long-term hydrothermal scheduling (HTS) is a multi-stage stochastic optimization problem which aims to calculate a decision policy regarding the operation of hydrothermal systems that minimizes the expected costs while taking into account physical and operational constraints of the system. The HTS problem has traditionally been solved by means of stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP). Despite its successful utilization for solving large-scale HTS problems, the computation times for solving the HTS problem by means of an SDDP approach may become prohibitive in the context of energy markets (where the HTS model generally appears in the lower level of bilevel equilibrium problems) and also in the context of risk-averse decision making policies. In these contexts, rolling horizon (RH) approaches can provide a good trade-off between optimality and computational effort. The RH approach approximates expected future costs by means of a single forward procedure. Although the RH approach is able to fully explore uncertainties embedded in the set of scenarios, it does not present a mechanism for evaluating the errors in the expected future costs, which may result in some level of cost sub-optimality. In this paper, an adaptive stochastic (AS) approach is proposed for solving multi-stage stochastic optimization problems that enhances the level of optimality of the RH approach. Two HTS models are proposed, involving the adoption of the RH and the AS approaches, respectively. The decision-making policies calculated by these models are compared in terms of the evolution of the expected values for power dispatches, optimality, prices, and reservoir volumes. Numerical results confirm the higher levels of optimality achieved by the proposed AS approach where reduction costs of near 20% were achieved for a portion of the Brazilian system with a total of 48.4 GW, which represents 47.4% of the installed hydraulic capacity of this system, as well as significant improvements in the hydraulic and economic aspects (e.g. prices were reduced around 50% in peak periods for a 10-power plant study) of the HTS problem. A post-optimization simulation procedure conducted to evaluate the quality of the uncertainty modeling within the proposed RH-HTS and AS-HTS models demonstrates that the decisions calculated by both models have proven to be highly robust in withstanding random water inflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 124730"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive stochastic approach for solving long-term hydrothermal scheduling problems\",\"authors\":\"Caio Nogueira Chaves ,&nbsp;Tiago Forti da Silva ,&nbsp;João Paulo Manarelli Gaspar ,&nbsp;André Christóvão Pio Martins ,&nbsp;Edilaine Martins Soler ,&nbsp;Antonio Roberto Balbo ,&nbsp;Leonardo Nepomuceno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The long-term hydrothermal scheduling (HTS) is a multi-stage stochastic optimization problem which aims to calculate a decision policy regarding the operation of hydrothermal systems that minimizes the expected costs while taking into account physical and operational constraints of the system. The HTS problem has traditionally been solved by means of stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP). Despite its successful utilization for solving large-scale HTS problems, the computation times for solving the HTS problem by means of an SDDP approach may become prohibitive in the context of energy markets (where the HTS model generally appears in the lower level of bilevel equilibrium problems) and also in the context of risk-averse decision making policies. In these contexts, rolling horizon (RH) approaches can provide a good trade-off between optimality and computational effort. The RH approach approximates expected future costs by means of a single forward procedure. Although the RH approach is able to fully explore uncertainties embedded in the set of scenarios, it does not present a mechanism for evaluating the errors in the expected future costs, which may result in some level of cost sub-optimality. In this paper, an adaptive stochastic (AS) approach is proposed for solving multi-stage stochastic optimization problems that enhances the level of optimality of the RH approach. Two HTS models are proposed, involving the adoption of the RH and the AS approaches, respectively. The decision-making policies calculated by these models are compared in terms of the evolution of the expected values for power dispatches, optimality, prices, and reservoir volumes. Numerical results confirm the higher levels of optimality achieved by the proposed AS approach where reduction costs of near 20% were achieved for a portion of the Brazilian system with a total of 48.4 GW, which represents 47.4% of the installed hydraulic capacity of this system, as well as significant improvements in the hydraulic and economic aspects (e.g. prices were reduced around 50% in peak periods for a 10-power plant study) of the HTS problem. A post-optimization simulation procedure conducted to evaluate the quality of the uncertainty modeling within the proposed RH-HTS and AS-HTS models demonstrates that the decisions calculated by both models have proven to be highly robust in withstanding random water inflows.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"378 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021135\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924021135","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期水热调度(HTS)是一个多阶段随机优化问题,其目的是计算出水热系统运行的决策政策,使预期成本最小化,同时考虑到系统的物理和运行限制。传统上,水热系统问题是通过随机二元动态程序设计(SDDP)来解决的。尽管这种方法在解决大规模 HTS 问题上取得了成功,但在能源市场(HTS 模型通常出现在双级均衡问题的低级阶段)和规避风险的决策政策中,采用 SDDP 方法解决 HTS 问题的计算时间可能会变得过长。在这种情况下,滚动地平线(RH)方法可以很好地权衡最优性和计算量。RH 方法通过单一前向程序近似计算未来预期成本。虽然 RH 方法能够充分探索情景集合中的不确定性,但它没有提供评估预期未来成本误差的机制,这可能会导致一定程度的成本次优。本文提出了一种自适应随机(AS)方法,用于解决多阶段随机优化问题,从而提高 RH 方法的优化水平。本文提出了两个 HTS 模型,分别采用了 RH 方法和 AS 方法。从电力调度预期值的变化、最优性、价格和水库容量等方面对这些模型计算出的决策政策进行了比较。数值结果证实了所提出的 AS 方法实现了更高水平的优化,巴西系统中总计 48.4 千兆瓦(占该系统水力装机容量的 47.4%)的一部分实现了接近 20% 的成本降低,并且在水力和经济方面(例如,在对 10 个发电厂的研究中,高峰期的价格降低了约 50%)显著改善了 HTS 问题。为评估 RH-HTS 和 AS-HTS 模型中不确定性建模的质量而进行的优化后模拟程序表明,这两个模型计算出的决策在应对随机水流方面具有很强的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptive stochastic approach for solving long-term hydrothermal scheduling problems
The long-term hydrothermal scheduling (HTS) is a multi-stage stochastic optimization problem which aims to calculate a decision policy regarding the operation of hydrothermal systems that minimizes the expected costs while taking into account physical and operational constraints of the system. The HTS problem has traditionally been solved by means of stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP). Despite its successful utilization for solving large-scale HTS problems, the computation times for solving the HTS problem by means of an SDDP approach may become prohibitive in the context of energy markets (where the HTS model generally appears in the lower level of bilevel equilibrium problems) and also in the context of risk-averse decision making policies. In these contexts, rolling horizon (RH) approaches can provide a good trade-off between optimality and computational effort. The RH approach approximates expected future costs by means of a single forward procedure. Although the RH approach is able to fully explore uncertainties embedded in the set of scenarios, it does not present a mechanism for evaluating the errors in the expected future costs, which may result in some level of cost sub-optimality. In this paper, an adaptive stochastic (AS) approach is proposed for solving multi-stage stochastic optimization problems that enhances the level of optimality of the RH approach. Two HTS models are proposed, involving the adoption of the RH and the AS approaches, respectively. The decision-making policies calculated by these models are compared in terms of the evolution of the expected values for power dispatches, optimality, prices, and reservoir volumes. Numerical results confirm the higher levels of optimality achieved by the proposed AS approach where reduction costs of near 20% were achieved for a portion of the Brazilian system with a total of 48.4 GW, which represents 47.4% of the installed hydraulic capacity of this system, as well as significant improvements in the hydraulic and economic aspects (e.g. prices were reduced around 50% in peak periods for a 10-power plant study) of the HTS problem. A post-optimization simulation procedure conducted to evaluate the quality of the uncertainty modeling within the proposed RH-HTS and AS-HTS models demonstrates that the decisions calculated by both models have proven to be highly robust in withstanding random water inflows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Boosting the power density of direct borohydride fuel cells to >600 mW cm−2 by cathode water management Editorial Board A distributed thermal-pressure coupling model of large-format lithium iron phosphate battery thermal runaway Optimization and parametric analysis of a novel design of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine using artificial neural network Delay-tolerant hierarchical distributed control for DC microgrid clusters considering microgrid autonomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1