{"title":"推动者还是障碍?发电企业在中国能源转型中的多重故事","authors":"Ying Sun , Aitong Li , Taorui Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Synchronizing creation and destruction in energy transition could be challenging, and the policy mixes might not be well coordinated. Preexisting studies have given state-centered interpretations to the misalignment between the ‘creative’ and ‘destructive’ efforts. Complementing the state-centered perspectives, this paper tries to offer an alternative explanation from the lens of the political-economic rationality of the state-owned power companies (SPCs) at the micro-level. The analysis uncovers a blend of strategies through which SPCs navigate the intricate landscape of the transition mandates, including (1) engaging in territory competition, (2) utilizing natural gas to adjust the pace of transition, (3) planning renewable energy investment sequences, (4) implementing supply chain management, and (5) deploying financial innovations. Out of these strategies emerge the multifaceted roles of the incumbents, who occupy a dynamic space that lies between being barriers and serving as enablers. The complex interplay and possible discordance between government intervention and the incumbents' responses introduce elements of complexity and unpredictability into the transition process. These findings call for the integration of macro- and micro-scale perspectives to ensure that policies and interventions are robust enough to accommodate both anticipated and unforeseen challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 103808"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition\",\"authors\":\"Ying Sun , Aitong Li , Taorui Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Synchronizing creation and destruction in energy transition could be challenging, and the policy mixes might not be well coordinated. Preexisting studies have given state-centered interpretations to the misalignment between the ‘creative’ and ‘destructive’ efforts. Complementing the state-centered perspectives, this paper tries to offer an alternative explanation from the lens of the political-economic rationality of the state-owned power companies (SPCs) at the micro-level. The analysis uncovers a blend of strategies through which SPCs navigate the intricate landscape of the transition mandates, including (1) engaging in territory competition, (2) utilizing natural gas to adjust the pace of transition, (3) planning renewable energy investment sequences, (4) implementing supply chain management, and (5) deploying financial innovations. Out of these strategies emerge the multifaceted roles of the incumbents, who occupy a dynamic space that lies between being barriers and serving as enablers. The complex interplay and possible discordance between government intervention and the incumbents' responses introduce elements of complexity and unpredictability into the transition process. These findings call for the integration of macro- and micro-scale perspectives to ensure that policies and interventions are robust enough to accommodate both anticipated and unforeseen challenges.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
Synchronizing creation and destruction in energy transition could be challenging, and the policy mixes might not be well coordinated. Preexisting studies have given state-centered interpretations to the misalignment between the ‘creative’ and ‘destructive’ efforts. Complementing the state-centered perspectives, this paper tries to offer an alternative explanation from the lens of the political-economic rationality of the state-owned power companies (SPCs) at the micro-level. The analysis uncovers a blend of strategies through which SPCs navigate the intricate landscape of the transition mandates, including (1) engaging in territory competition, (2) utilizing natural gas to adjust the pace of transition, (3) planning renewable energy investment sequences, (4) implementing supply chain management, and (5) deploying financial innovations. Out of these strategies emerge the multifaceted roles of the incumbents, who occupy a dynamic space that lies between being barriers and serving as enablers. The complex interplay and possible discordance between government intervention and the incumbents' responses introduce elements of complexity and unpredictability into the transition process. These findings call for the integration of macro- and micro-scale perspectives to ensure that policies and interventions are robust enough to accommodate both anticipated and unforeseen challenges.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.