电脑并不总是做得更好!计算机自动奖励计算对消费者低碳行为数字激励满意度的影响

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107991
Xin Jiang , Zhihua Ding , Yupeng Mou , Yue Liu , Manqiong Shen
{"title":"电脑并不总是做得更好!计算机自动奖励计算对消费者低碳行为数字激励满意度的影响","authors":"Xin Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhihua Ding ,&nbsp;Yupeng Mou ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Manqiong Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital incentive tools encourage participants by recording and rewarding their daily low-carbon behavior on digital platforms, ultimately fostering a low-carbon lifestyle. This research explores the contextual factor affecting the effectiveness of rewards in digital incentive tools, specifically the impact of computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) on satisfaction towards rewards. Through four controlled experiments focused on green commuting with American samples and one field experiment on clothing recycling with a Chinese sample, this research finds when participants notified of rewards, the computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) reduces their satisfaction towards rewards. That is, when participants notified of potential rewards, presented computer-calculated outcomes automatically (rather than allowed to self-calculate their own rewards) would diminish their satisfaction towards rewards. This effect is mediated by the reduced salience of reward elements rather than decreased self-involvement. Furthermore, listing reward components can alleviate this negative impact. This research enhances the literature on extrinsic rewards and low-carbon behavior by identifying the design of automated reward calculations as a novel factor undermining reward effectiveness, and recommending practitioners to enhance participants' perception of elements constituting the rewards.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 107991"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The computer does not always do it better! The effect of computer-automated reward calculations on consumer satisfaction with digital incentives for low-carbon behavior\",\"authors\":\"Xin Jiang ,&nbsp;Zhihua Ding ,&nbsp;Yupeng Mou ,&nbsp;Yue Liu ,&nbsp;Manqiong Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital incentive tools encourage participants by recording and rewarding their daily low-carbon behavior on digital platforms, ultimately fostering a low-carbon lifestyle. This research explores the contextual factor affecting the effectiveness of rewards in digital incentive tools, specifically the impact of computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) on satisfaction towards rewards. Through four controlled experiments focused on green commuting with American samples and one field experiment on clothing recycling with a Chinese sample, this research finds when participants notified of rewards, the computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) reduces their satisfaction towards rewards. That is, when participants notified of potential rewards, presented computer-calculated outcomes automatically (rather than allowed to self-calculate their own rewards) would diminish their satisfaction towards rewards. This effect is mediated by the reduced salience of reward elements rather than decreased self-involvement. Furthermore, listing reward components can alleviate this negative impact. This research enhances the literature on extrinsic rewards and low-carbon behavior by identifying the design of automated reward calculations as a novel factor undermining reward effectiveness, and recommending practitioners to enhance participants' perception of elements constituting the rewards.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"212 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005822\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005822","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字激励工具通过在数字平台上记录和奖励参与者的日常低碳行为来鼓励他们,最终促进低碳生活方式的形成。本研究探讨了影响数字激励工具中奖励效果的环境因素,特别是计算机自动计算设计(相对于自我计算设计)对奖励满意度的影响。通过四个以美国样本为对象的绿色通勤对照实验和一个以中国样本为对象的衣物回收实地实验,本研究发现,当参与者收到奖励通知时,计算机自动计算设计(与自我计算设计相比)会降低他们对奖励的满意度。也就是说,当参与者收到潜在奖励通知时,计算机自动计算的结果(而不是让他们自己计算奖励)会降低他们对奖励的满意度。这种效应是由奖励元素的显著性降低而非自我参与度降低所促成的。此外,列出奖励要素可以减轻这种负面影响。这项研究将自动奖励计算的设计视为削弱奖励有效性的一个新因素,并建议实践者增强参与者对奖励构成要素的感知,从而丰富了有关外在奖励和低碳行为的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The computer does not always do it better! The effect of computer-automated reward calculations on consumer satisfaction with digital incentives for low-carbon behavior
Digital incentive tools encourage participants by recording and rewarding their daily low-carbon behavior on digital platforms, ultimately fostering a low-carbon lifestyle. This research explores the contextual factor affecting the effectiveness of rewards in digital incentive tools, specifically the impact of computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) on satisfaction towards rewards. Through four controlled experiments focused on green commuting with American samples and one field experiment on clothing recycling with a Chinese sample, this research finds when participants notified of rewards, the computer-automated calculation design (vs. self-calculation design) reduces their satisfaction towards rewards. That is, when participants notified of potential rewards, presented computer-calculated outcomes automatically (rather than allowed to self-calculate their own rewards) would diminish their satisfaction towards rewards. This effect is mediated by the reduced salience of reward elements rather than decreased self-involvement. Furthermore, listing reward components can alleviate this negative impact. This research enhances the literature on extrinsic rewards and low-carbon behavior by identifying the design of automated reward calculations as a novel factor undermining reward effectiveness, and recommending practitioners to enhance participants' perception of elements constituting the rewards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Electrical and electronic equipment repair in a circular economy: Investigating consumer behaviour in Hong Kong Phenol production from pyrolysis of waste printed circuit boards: life cycle and techno-economic assessment How does digitalization affect carbon emissions in animal husbandry? A new evidence from China Dynamic assessment of photovoltaic waste streams in the EU-27 countries under the circular economy principles of ‘Reduce, Reuse and Recycle’ Compressive strength and regional supply implications of rice straw and rice hull ashes used as supplementary cementitious materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1