Field versus laboratory measurements of PFAS sorption by soils and sediments

Sorption by soils and sediments is an important process that influences the distribution, transport, and fate of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment. Many laboratory studies have been conducted to quantify magnitudes of PFAS sorption as a function of the properties of the PFAS, solutions, and porous media. A critical question is how representative are laboratory-measured sorption magnitudes for field applications. To address this question, log K_oc data were compiled from the literature for a range of PFAS of different chain lengths and functional groups. The aggregated field-based data consisted of two types, in-situ measurements comprising paired soil/sediment and water samples and ex-situ measurements obtained from laboratory desorption experiments employing field-contaminated media. These two sets of field-based measurements were compared to a comprehensive data set of standard laboratory batch-type measurements. The compiled data sets represent an extremely wide range of soil and sediment properties. One important novel outcome is the observation that the enhanced sorption of short-chain PFAS observed in several prior laboratory studies is also observed for the field data. This differential enhanced sorption should be accounted for in site investigations and modeling studies. Another relevant outcome is the observation of consistency between measurements obtained with standard batch adsorption experiments and those from desorption studies employing either field-contaminated or artificially-contaminated media. The mean log K_oc values determined for the in-situ measured field data were generally larger than the mean laboratory-determined values, particularly for the short-chain PFAS. Notably, however, values for subsets of the laboratory data representing measurements for lower aqueous concentrations or for soils with low organic-carbon contents (<1 %) compared well to the in-situ field data. Measurements compiled for anionic-polyfluoroalkyl, neutral, and cationic PFAS compared well to those for PFCAs and PFSAs. Overall, the results indicate that the laboratory measurements of PFAS sorption were generally representative of the field-derived magnitudes when compared on a consistent basis.