{"title":"需求驱动的木门/竹门:碳储存潜力和温室气体足迹","authors":"Zhiping Wang , Rongjun Zhao , Jinmei Xu , Shuangbao Zhang , Zhangjing Chen , Wenfa Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to large number of doors used housing and construction products, the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint related to door manufacturing is an interesting topic. Timber and bamboo products can reduce GHG emission due to their biogenic carbon storage via photosynthesis. The scientific evidence on the climate impact using wood-based door (WBD) and bamboo-based door (BBD) to replace steel-based door (SBD) is limited. In this study, life cycle assessments for WBD, BBD, SBD were conducted to evaluate the carbon impacts of raw materials, production, transport, and end-of-life stages. The GHG footprint of WBD, BBD, and SBD ranged from 270.42 to 363.24, 285.31–398.31, and 983.8–986.76 kg CO<sub>2</sub> e/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, indicating that the bio-based doors exhibited lower energy consumption and GHG emissions. The raw material stage (484.78–569.34 kg CO<sub>2</sub> e/m<sup>3</sup>) was identified as a major source of GHG emissions throughout the product life cycle, while hot-pressing and coating processes were identified as emission hotspots in the production stage. Regarding biogenic carbon storage, the use of bio-based materials instead of steel-based materials for fire door manufacturing significantly reduced emissions. Considering disposal methods, recycling and incineration should be prioritized over landfills. Future research should focus on field survey in raw material stage, along with conducting a technical and economic analysis. The results provide valuable guidance for selecting doors in China in term of biogenic carbon storage and resource protection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107451"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demand-driven wood/bamboo doors: Carbon storage potential and greenhouse gas footprint\",\"authors\":\"Zhiping Wang , Rongjun Zhao , Jinmei Xu , Shuangbao Zhang , Zhangjing Chen , Wenfa Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Due to large number of doors used housing and construction products, the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint related to door manufacturing is an interesting topic. Timber and bamboo products can reduce GHG emission due to their biogenic carbon storage via photosynthesis. The scientific evidence on the climate impact using wood-based door (WBD) and bamboo-based door (BBD) to replace steel-based door (SBD) is limited. In this study, life cycle assessments for WBD, BBD, SBD were conducted to evaluate the carbon impacts of raw materials, production, transport, and end-of-life stages. The GHG footprint of WBD, BBD, and SBD ranged from 270.42 to 363.24, 285.31–398.31, and 983.8–986.76 kg CO<sub>2</sub> e/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, indicating that the bio-based doors exhibited lower energy consumption and GHG emissions. The raw material stage (484.78–569.34 kg CO<sub>2</sub> e/m<sup>3</sup>) was identified as a major source of GHG emissions throughout the product life cycle, while hot-pressing and coating processes were identified as emission hotspots in the production stage. Regarding biogenic carbon storage, the use of bio-based materials instead of steel-based materials for fire door manufacturing significantly reduced emissions. Considering disposal methods, recycling and incineration should be prioritized over landfills. Future research should focus on field survey in raw material stage, along with conducting a technical and economic analysis. The results provide valuable guidance for selecting doors in China in term of biogenic carbon storage and resource protection.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于住房和建筑产品中使用了大量的门,因此与门制造相关的温室气体(GHG)足迹是一个有趣的话题。木材和竹制品通过光合作用储存生物碳,可以减少温室气体排放。关于使用木质门(WBD)和竹质门(BBD)替代钢质门(SBD)对气候影响的科学证据还很有限。本研究对 WBD、BBD 和 SBD 进行了生命周期评估,以评估原材料、生产、运输和生命终结阶段的碳影响。WBD、BBD 和 SBD 的温室气体足迹分别为 270.42 至 363.24、285.31 至 398.31 和 983.8 至 986.76 kg CO2 e/m3,表明生物基木门的能耗和温室气体排放量较低。原材料阶段(484.78-569.34 kg CO2 e/m3)被认为是整个产品生命周期的主要温室气体排放源,而热压和涂层过程被认为是生产阶段的排放热点。在生物碳储存方面,使用生物基材料代替钢基材料制造防火门大大减少了排放量。考虑到处理方法,应优先考虑回收和焚烧,而不是填埋。未来的研究应侧重于原材料阶段的实地调查,同时进行技术和经济分析。研究结果为中国在生物碳储存和资源保护方面选择防火门提供了有价值的指导。
Demand-driven wood/bamboo doors: Carbon storage potential and greenhouse gas footprint
Due to large number of doors used housing and construction products, the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint related to door manufacturing is an interesting topic. Timber and bamboo products can reduce GHG emission due to their biogenic carbon storage via photosynthesis. The scientific evidence on the climate impact using wood-based door (WBD) and bamboo-based door (BBD) to replace steel-based door (SBD) is limited. In this study, life cycle assessments for WBD, BBD, SBD were conducted to evaluate the carbon impacts of raw materials, production, transport, and end-of-life stages. The GHG footprint of WBD, BBD, and SBD ranged from 270.42 to 363.24, 285.31–398.31, and 983.8–986.76 kg CO2 e/m3, respectively, indicating that the bio-based doors exhibited lower energy consumption and GHG emissions. The raw material stage (484.78–569.34 kg CO2 e/m3) was identified as a major source of GHG emissions throughout the product life cycle, while hot-pressing and coating processes were identified as emission hotspots in the production stage. Regarding biogenic carbon storage, the use of bio-based materials instead of steel-based materials for fire door manufacturing significantly reduced emissions. Considering disposal methods, recycling and incineration should be prioritized over landfills. Future research should focus on field survey in raw material stage, along with conducting a technical and economic analysis. The results provide valuable guidance for selecting doors in China in term of biogenic carbon storage and resource protection.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.