Mengyuan Huang , Yu Xiang , Jinzhi Ni , Huiying Zhang , Ran Wei , Weifeng Chen
{"title":"茶叶废弃物衍生生物炭的碳稳定性和能量特性:热解温度和与纳米级零价铁共热解的影响","authors":"Mengyuan Huang , Yu Xiang , Jinzhi Ni , Huiying Zhang , Ran Wei , Weifeng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pyrolytic temperature and Fe addition are two typical factors widely used for modifying the characteristic of biochar, however, their co-effect on the C emission reduction (enhancing C stability) and fuel features of tea waste biochar remain unclear. Hence, this study systematically investigated the effects of pyrolytic temperature (300–900 °C) and nanoscale zero-valent iron (Fe) co-pyrolysis on the C stability and fuel features of TBC. Herein, H/C, (O + N)/C, FTIR spectrum, XRD spectrum, <em>I</em><sub>g</sub>/(<em>I</em><sub>d</sub> + <em>I</em><sub>g</sub>) and DOC release suggested that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aliphaticity, polarity and DOC content, but increased the aromaticity and graphitic degree for TBC. Meanwhile, Fe co-pyrolysis decreased the polarity and enhanced the graphitic degree of TBC at 800–900 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated that Fe co-pyrolysis lowered the thermostability of C. Differently, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> oxidization method indicated Fe co-pyrolysis significantly enhanced the chemical stability of C. Furthermore, Uv–vis and fluorescence spectrum indicated that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aromaticity and molecular size of biochar-derived DOC. Fe co-pyrolysis increased the release of large molecular humic-like matters rather than small molecular protein-like matters. All the results suggested high pyrolytic temperature and Fe co-pyrolysis could improve the environmental (physico-chemical) C stability of TBC and the C emission reduction. Additionally, TBC presented a considerable energy densification ratio (EDR) ranges (1.355–1.450) of wood- and straw-derived biochars, indicating TBC could be a potential high-performance biofuel to alleviate the energy crisis. This study provides important information to optimize pyrolysis conditions to re-use of tea waste for C emission reduction and fuel substitute.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 107458"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The carbon stability and energy characteristics of tea waste-derived biochar: Effects of pyrolytic temperature and co-pyrolysis with nanoscale zero-valent iron\",\"authors\":\"Mengyuan Huang , Yu Xiang , Jinzhi Ni , Huiying Zhang , Ran Wei , Weifeng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pyrolytic temperature and Fe addition are two typical factors widely used for modifying the characteristic of biochar, however, their co-effect on the C emission reduction (enhancing C stability) and fuel features of tea waste biochar remain unclear. Hence, this study systematically investigated the effects of pyrolytic temperature (300–900 °C) and nanoscale zero-valent iron (Fe) co-pyrolysis on the C stability and fuel features of TBC. Herein, H/C, (O + N)/C, FTIR spectrum, XRD spectrum, <em>I</em><sub>g</sub>/(<em>I</em><sub>d</sub> + <em>I</em><sub>g</sub>) and DOC release suggested that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aliphaticity, polarity and DOC content, but increased the aromaticity and graphitic degree for TBC. Meanwhile, Fe co-pyrolysis decreased the polarity and enhanced the graphitic degree of TBC at 800–900 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated that Fe co-pyrolysis lowered the thermostability of C. Differently, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> oxidization method indicated Fe co-pyrolysis significantly enhanced the chemical stability of C. Furthermore, Uv–vis and fluorescence spectrum indicated that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aromaticity and molecular size of biochar-derived DOC. Fe co-pyrolysis increased the release of large molecular humic-like matters rather than small molecular protein-like matters. All the results suggested high pyrolytic temperature and Fe co-pyrolysis could improve the environmental (physico-chemical) C stability of TBC and the C emission reduction. Additionally, TBC presented a considerable energy densification ratio (EDR) ranges (1.355–1.450) of wood- and straw-derived biochars, indicating TBC could be a potential high-performance biofuel to alleviate the energy crisis. This study provides important information to optimize pyrolysis conditions to re-use of tea waste for C emission reduction and fuel substitute.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"191 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424004112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
热解温度和铁添加量是两个被广泛用于改变生物炭特性的典型因素,但它们对茶叶废弃物生物炭的碳减排(提高碳稳定性)和燃料特性的共同影响仍不清楚。因此,本研究系统地研究了热解温度(300-900 °C)和纳米级零价铁(Fe)协同热解对茶叶废弃物生物炭的碳稳定性和燃料特性的影响。其中,H/C、(O + N)/C、傅立叶变换红外光谱、X 射线衍射光谱、Ig/(Id + Ig)和 DOC 释放量表明,热解温度的提高降低了 TBC 的脂肪族、极性和 DOC 含量,但提高了芳香族和石墨化程度。同时,在 800-900 °C 温度下,铁协同热解降低了 TBC 的极性,提高了其石墨化程度。热重分析表明,铁共热解降低了 C 的热稳定性。不同的是,H2O2 氧化法表明铁共热解显著提高了 C 的化学稳定性。铁协同热解增加了大分子腐殖质的释放,而不是小分子蛋白质类物质。所有这些结果表明,高热解温度和铁协同热解可以提高 TBC 的环境(物理化学)碳稳定性并减少碳排放。此外,TBC 的能量密度比(EDR)范围(1.355-1.450)与木材和秸秆衍生生物炭相当,这表明 TBC 有可能成为一种缓解能源危机的高性能生物燃料。这项研究为优化热解条件以重新利用茶叶废弃物实现碳减排和燃料替代提供了重要信息。
The carbon stability and energy characteristics of tea waste-derived biochar: Effects of pyrolytic temperature and co-pyrolysis with nanoscale zero-valent iron
Pyrolytic temperature and Fe addition are two typical factors widely used for modifying the characteristic of biochar, however, their co-effect on the C emission reduction (enhancing C stability) and fuel features of tea waste biochar remain unclear. Hence, this study systematically investigated the effects of pyrolytic temperature (300–900 °C) and nanoscale zero-valent iron (Fe) co-pyrolysis on the C stability and fuel features of TBC. Herein, H/C, (O + N)/C, FTIR spectrum, XRD spectrum, Ig/(Id + Ig) and DOC release suggested that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aliphaticity, polarity and DOC content, but increased the aromaticity and graphitic degree for TBC. Meanwhile, Fe co-pyrolysis decreased the polarity and enhanced the graphitic degree of TBC at 800–900 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated that Fe co-pyrolysis lowered the thermostability of C. Differently, H2O2 oxidization method indicated Fe co-pyrolysis significantly enhanced the chemical stability of C. Furthermore, Uv–vis and fluorescence spectrum indicated that pyrolytic temperature improvement decreased the aromaticity and molecular size of biochar-derived DOC. Fe co-pyrolysis increased the release of large molecular humic-like matters rather than small molecular protein-like matters. All the results suggested high pyrolytic temperature and Fe co-pyrolysis could improve the environmental (physico-chemical) C stability of TBC and the C emission reduction. Additionally, TBC presented a considerable energy densification ratio (EDR) ranges (1.355–1.450) of wood- and straw-derived biochars, indicating TBC could be a potential high-performance biofuel to alleviate the energy crisis. This study provides important information to optimize pyrolysis conditions to re-use of tea waste for C emission reduction and fuel substitute.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.