为昆士兰州澳大利亚南海岛民考古开发整体合作方法

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2024-07-28 DOI:10.1002/arco.5330
Imelda Miller, Zia Youse, Tomasina Bickey, Eve Haddow, Geraldine Mate, Adele Zubrzycka, Jonathan Prangnell, Andrew Fairbairn, Helena Robinson, Thomas Baumgartl, James L. Flexner
{"title":"为昆士兰州澳大利亚南海岛民考古开发整体合作方法","authors":"Imelda Miller,&nbsp;Zia Youse,&nbsp;Tomasina Bickey,&nbsp;Eve Haddow,&nbsp;Geraldine Mate,&nbsp;Adele Zubrzycka,&nbsp;Jonathan Prangnell,&nbsp;Andrew Fairbairn,&nbsp;Helena Robinson,&nbsp;Thomas Baumgartl,&nbsp;James L. Flexner","doi":"10.1002/arco.5330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Australian South Sea Islanders are a distinctive cultural group comprising descendants of over 60000 labourers who came to Australia from Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and elsewhere in the Western Pacific between 1863 and 1904. “Blackbirded” labourers were commonly referred to as victims of a slave trade, though many also came voluntarily to work in the sugar plantations of northern New South Wales and Queensland. The advent of racist exclusionary immigration policies introduced from 1901 further forced South Sea Islanders to the margins of colonial society. Yet many Australian South Sea Islanders would argue their untold history speaks to resilience and overcoming adversity. Australian South Sea Islanders have a distinctive cultural heritage, including material culture, oral traditions embedded in the landscape and connections to places – from sugar mills to domestic sites – revealed archaeologically. This heritage must be approached sensitively given its association with sometimes difficult histories but is crucial to understanding the contributions of Australian South Sea Islanders to Australian society, contemporary communities and identities, and historical and social significance across multiple scales. Collaborative research with Australian South Sea Islanders pushes the boundaries of “community archaeology” by taking a slow approach to research, reframing ethnographic objects and cultural landscapes, and producing an archaeology that can include many voices.</p>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"59 3","pages":"435-449"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5330","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a holistic and collaborative approach for the archaeology of Australian South Sea Islanders in Queensland\",\"authors\":\"Imelda Miller,&nbsp;Zia Youse,&nbsp;Tomasina Bickey,&nbsp;Eve Haddow,&nbsp;Geraldine Mate,&nbsp;Adele Zubrzycka,&nbsp;Jonathan Prangnell,&nbsp;Andrew Fairbairn,&nbsp;Helena Robinson,&nbsp;Thomas Baumgartl,&nbsp;James L. Flexner\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/arco.5330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Australian South Sea Islanders are a distinctive cultural group comprising descendants of over 60000 labourers who came to Australia from Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and elsewhere in the Western Pacific between 1863 and 1904. “Blackbirded” labourers were commonly referred to as victims of a slave trade, though many also came voluntarily to work in the sugar plantations of northern New South Wales and Queensland. The advent of racist exclusionary immigration policies introduced from 1901 further forced South Sea Islanders to the margins of colonial society. Yet many Australian South Sea Islanders would argue their untold history speaks to resilience and overcoming adversity. Australian South Sea Islanders have a distinctive cultural heritage, including material culture, oral traditions embedded in the landscape and connections to places – from sugar mills to domestic sites – revealed archaeologically. This heritage must be approached sensitively given its association with sometimes difficult histories but is crucial to understanding the contributions of Australian South Sea Islanders to Australian society, contemporary communities and identities, and historical and social significance across multiple scales. Collaborative research with Australian South Sea Islanders pushes the boundaries of “community archaeology” by taking a slow approach to research, reframing ethnographic objects and cultural landscapes, and producing an archaeology that can include many voices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"volume\":\"59 3\",\"pages\":\"435-449\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5330\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeology in Oceania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.5330\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology in Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.5330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚南海岛民是一个独特的文化群体,由 1863 年至 1904 年间从瓦努阿图、所罗门群岛和西太平洋其他地方来到澳大利亚的 6 万多名劳工的后裔组成。"黑鸟 "劳工通常被称为奴隶贸易的受害者,但也有许多人自愿来到新南威尔士州北部和昆士兰州的蔗糖种植园工作。从 1901 年开始实行的种族主义排外移民政策进一步将南海岛民推向殖民社会的边缘。然而,许多澳大利亚南海岛民会说,他们不为人知的历史说明了他们的韧性和克服逆境的能力。澳大利亚南海岛民拥有独特的文化遗产,包括物质文化、蕴含在景观中的口述传统以及考古发现的与各地(从糖厂到家庭遗址)的联系。鉴于这些遗产有时与艰辛的历史有关,因此必须以敏感的态度对待,但这些遗产对于了解澳大利亚南海岛民对澳大利亚社会、当代社区和身份认同的贡献,以及跨越多个尺度的历史和社会意义至关重要。与澳大利亚南海岛民的合作研究通过采取缓慢的研究方法、重构人种学对象和文化景观,以及产生一种能够包含多种声音的考古学,推动了 "社区考古学 "的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a holistic and collaborative approach for the archaeology of Australian South Sea Islanders in Queensland

Australian South Sea Islanders are a distinctive cultural group comprising descendants of over 60000 labourers who came to Australia from Vanuatu, Solomon Islands and elsewhere in the Western Pacific between 1863 and 1904. “Blackbirded” labourers were commonly referred to as victims of a slave trade, though many also came voluntarily to work in the sugar plantations of northern New South Wales and Queensland. The advent of racist exclusionary immigration policies introduced from 1901 further forced South Sea Islanders to the margins of colonial society. Yet many Australian South Sea Islanders would argue their untold history speaks to resilience and overcoming adversity. Australian South Sea Islanders have a distinctive cultural heritage, including material culture, oral traditions embedded in the landscape and connections to places – from sugar mills to domestic sites – revealed archaeologically. This heritage must be approached sensitively given its association with sometimes difficult histories but is crucial to understanding the contributions of Australian South Sea Islanders to Australian society, contemporary communities and identities, and historical and social significance across multiple scales. Collaborative research with Australian South Sea Islanders pushes the boundaries of “community archaeology” by taking a slow approach to research, reframing ethnographic objects and cultural landscapes, and producing an archaeology that can include many voices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeology in Oceania is published online and in print versions three times a year: April, July, October. It accepts articles and research reports in prehistoric and historical archaeology, modern material culture and human biology of ancient and modern human populations. Its primary geographic focus is Australia, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and lands of the western Pacific rim. All articles and research reports accepted as being within the remit of the journal and of appropriate standard will be reviewed by two scholars; authors will be informed of these comments though not necessarily of the reviewer’s names.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A new parasite discovery in Micronesia: eggs of the nematode Toxocara canis at archaeological sites on Ebon Atoll, Marshall Islands extend the known dog presence by c.600 years The archaeology of eastern Lutruwita (Tasmania) Kia kōrerorero tonu ai: a review of the dialogue at the interface of Indigenous oral tradition and archaeology in Aotearoa New Zealand and Oceania The age and position of the southern boundary of prehistoric Polynesian dispersal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1