为价值不可比性辩护：答复多尔、内贝尔和祖尔

Noûs Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/nous.12533

Erik Carlson, Olle Risberg

{"title":"为价值不可比性辩护：答复多尔、内贝尔和祖尔","authors":"Erik Carlson, Olle Risberg","doi":"10.1111/nous.12533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call ‘Strong Monotonicity’, which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability.","PeriodicalId":501006,"journal":{"name":"Noûs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl\",\"authors\":\"Erik Carlson, Olle Risberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nous.12533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call ‘Strong Monotonicity’, which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noûs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noûs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noûs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

西恩-多尔（Cian Dorr）、雅各布-内贝尔（Jacob Nebel）和杰克-祖尔（Jake Zuehl）认为，没有任何物品的价值是不可比拟的。在本文中，我们将对这些论点做出回应，从而捍卫价值不可比的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl

Cian Dorr, Jacob Nebel, and Jake Zuehl have argued that no objects are incomparable in value. One set of arguments they offer depart from a principle they call ‘Strong Monotonicity’, which states that if x is good and y is not good, then x is better than y. In this article, we respond to those arguments, thereby defending the possibility of value incomparability.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Noûs

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

From modality to millianism The censor's burden Paradoxes of infinite aggregation In defense of value incomparability: A reply to Dorr, Nebel, and Zuehl Who killed the causality of things?