接受前期自体造血干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的最佳输注 CD34+ 细胞剂量

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Blood Cancer Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1038/s41408-024-01165-w
Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R. Milton, Babar Pal, Mark R. Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Jaehyun Lee, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Yosra Aljawai, Partow Kebriaei, Melody R. Becnel, Hans C. Lee, Krina K. Patel, Sheeba K. Thomas, Robert Z. Orlowski, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Richard E. Champlin, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
{"title":"接受前期自体造血干细胞移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的最佳输注 CD34+ 细胞剂量","authors":"Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R. Milton, Babar Pal, Mark R. Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Jaehyun Lee, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Yosra Aljawai, Partow Kebriaei, Melody R. Becnel, Hans C. Lee, Krina K. Patel, Sheeba K. Thomas, Robert Z. Orlowski, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Richard E. Champlin, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash","doi":"10.1038/s41408-024-01165-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autologous transplantation remains the standard of care for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, yet optimal CD34<sup>+</sup> cell dose remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study on MM patients undergoing upfront transplant between 2005 and 2021 and divided them into low (≤2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg) and high (&gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg) CD34<sup>+</sup> dose groups. We included 2479 patients, 95 in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group and 2384 in the high CD34<sup>+</sup> group. Patients in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group were older (63.2 vs 61.1 years, <i>p</i> = 0.013), more often had R-ISS III (19% vs 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.014), received plerixafor (60% vs 35%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and transplanted after 2009 (88% vs 80%, <i>p</i> = 0.047). Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was longer in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group. Median PFS and OS were lower in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group (31.6 vs. 43.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.011 and 76.4 vs. 108.2 months, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Evaluation of incrementally higher CD34<sup>+</sup> dose did not show significant improvement in survival at thresholds &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg. Multivariable analysis affirmed that CD34<sup>+</sup> &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg was associated with better PFS (HR 0.71, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and OS (0.59, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching, a CD34<sup>+</sup> dose &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg remained a predictor of better OS (0.42, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, CD34<sup>+</sup> dose &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg was associated with improved survival, without any additional benefit at incrementally higher doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":8989,"journal":{"name":"Blood Cancer Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal infused CD34+ cell dose in multiple myeloma patients undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R. Milton, Babar Pal, Mark R. Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Jaehyun Lee, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Yosra Aljawai, Partow Kebriaei, Melody R. Becnel, Hans C. Lee, Krina K. Patel, Sheeba K. Thomas, Robert Z. Orlowski, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Richard E. Champlin, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41408-024-01165-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Autologous transplantation remains the standard of care for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, yet optimal CD34<sup>+</sup> cell dose remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study on MM patients undergoing upfront transplant between 2005 and 2021 and divided them into low (≤2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg) and high (&gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg) CD34<sup>+</sup> dose groups. We included 2479 patients, 95 in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group and 2384 in the high CD34<sup>+</sup> group. Patients in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group were older (63.2 vs 61.1 years, <i>p</i> = 0.013), more often had R-ISS III (19% vs 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.014), received plerixafor (60% vs 35%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and transplanted after 2009 (88% vs 80%, <i>p</i> = 0.047). Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was longer in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group. Median PFS and OS were lower in the low CD34<sup>+</sup> group (31.6 vs. 43.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.011 and 76.4 vs. 108.2 months, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Evaluation of incrementally higher CD34<sup>+</sup> dose did not show significant improvement in survival at thresholds &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg. Multivariable analysis affirmed that CD34<sup>+</sup> &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg was associated with better PFS (HR 0.71, <i>p</i> = 0.008) and OS (0.59, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). After propensity score matching, a CD34<sup>+</sup> dose &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg remained a predictor of better OS (0.42, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In conclusion, CD34<sup>+</sup> dose &gt;2.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/kg was associated with improved survival, without any additional benefit at incrementally higher doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Cancer Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01165-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01165-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自体移植仍是符合条件的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的标准治疗方法,但最佳CD34+细胞剂量仍不明确。我们对2005年至2021年间接受前期移植的MM患者进行了一项回顾性研究,并将他们分为低(≤2.5 × 106 cells/kg)和高(>2.5 × 106 cells/kg)CD34+剂量组。我们共纳入了 2479 例患者,其中低 CD34+ 组 95 例,高 CD34+ 组 2384 例。低 CD34+ 组患者年龄更大(63.2 岁 vs 61.1 岁,p = 0.013),更常出现 R-ISS III(19% vs 9%,p = 0.014),接受过普乐沙福(60% vs 35%,p <0.001),2009 年后移植(88% vs 80%,p = 0.047)。低CD34+组的中性粒细胞和血小板恢复时间更长。低CD34+组的中位PFS和OS较低(分别为31.6个月 vs. 43.6个月,p = 0.011和76.4个月 vs. 108.2个月,p < 0.001)。在阈值为 2.5 × 106 cells/kg 时,对 CD34+ 剂量递增的评估并未显示存活率有明显改善。多变量分析证实,CD34+ >2.5×106细胞/公斤与更好的PFS(HR 0.71,p = 0.008)和OS(0.59,p <0.001)相关。经过倾向评分匹配后,CD34+剂量为2.5×106个细胞/千克仍可预测较好的OS(0.42,p <0.001)。总之,CD34+剂量>2.5 × 106个/千克与生存率的改善有关,但在剂量递增的情况下没有任何额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal infused CD34+ cell dose in multiple myeloma patients undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Autologous transplantation remains the standard of care for eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients, yet optimal CD34+ cell dose remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective study on MM patients undergoing upfront transplant between 2005 and 2021 and divided them into low (≤2.5 × 106 cells/kg) and high (>2.5 × 106 cells/kg) CD34+ dose groups. We included 2479 patients, 95 in the low CD34+ group and 2384 in the high CD34+ group. Patients in the low CD34+ group were older (63.2 vs 61.1 years, p = 0.013), more often had R-ISS III (19% vs 9%, p = 0.014), received plerixafor (60% vs 35%, p < 0.001) and transplanted after 2009 (88% vs 80%, p = 0.047). Time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was longer in the low CD34+ group. Median PFS and OS were lower in the low CD34+ group (31.6 vs. 43.6 months, p = 0.011 and 76.4 vs. 108.2 months, p < 0.001, respectively). Evaluation of incrementally higher CD34+ dose did not show significant improvement in survival at thresholds >2.5 × 106 cells/kg. Multivariable analysis affirmed that CD34+ >2.5 × 106 cells/kg was associated with better PFS (HR 0.71, p = 0.008) and OS (0.59, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, a CD34+ dose >2.5 × 106 cells/kg remained a predictor of better OS (0.42, p < 0.001). In conclusion, CD34+ dose >2.5 × 106 cells/kg was associated with improved survival, without any additional benefit at incrementally higher doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
2.30%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Blood Cancer Journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality articles related to hematologic malignancies and related disorders. The journal welcomes submissions of original research, reviews, guidelines, and letters that are deemed to have a significant impact in the field. While the journal covers a wide range of topics, it particularly focuses on areas such as: Preclinical studies of new compounds, especially those that provide mechanistic insights Clinical trials and observations Reviews related to new drugs and current management of hematologic malignancies Novel observations related to new mutations, molecular pathways, and tumor genomics Blood Cancer Journal offers a forum for expedited publication of novel observations regarding new mutations or altered pathways.
期刊最新文献
Venetoclax combined with three-day multi-frequency decitabine (DEC3-VEN) in elder or intensive chemotherapy ineligible patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Frontline Ph-negative B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment and the emerging role of blinatumomab What have we learned about TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia? Impact of TP53 mutation on genetic and cellular hierarchy profile in complex karyotype AML/MDS with increased blasts A simplified, two-factor clinical prognostic scoring system for patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkins Lymphoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1