调查听力努力评估中的听觉认知敏感性:同步脑电图和瞳孔测量研究。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Brain and Behavior Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1002/brb3.70135
Samet Kılıç, Eser Sendesen, Filiz Aslan, Nurhan Erbil, Özgür Aydın, Didem Türkyılmaz
{"title":"调查听力努力评估中的听觉认知敏感性:同步脑电图和瞳孔测量研究。","authors":"Samet Kılıç,&nbsp;Eser Sendesen,&nbsp;Filiz Aslan,&nbsp;Nurhan Erbil,&nbsp;Özgür Aydın,&nbsp;Didem Türkyılmaz","doi":"10.1002/brb3.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>It is still not fully explained what kind of cognitive sources the methods used in the assessment of listening effort are more sensitive to and how these measurement results are related to each other. The aim of the study is to ascertain which neural resources crucial for listening effort are most sensitive to objective measurement methods using differently degraded speech stimuli.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 49 individuals between the ages of 19 and 34 with normal hearing participated in the study. In the first stage, simultaneous pupillometry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and single-task paradigm reaction time (RT) measurements were made during the challenging listening and repetition task with noise-vocoded speech. Two speech reception thresholds (SRT) (50% and 80%) for two vocoding conditions (16 and 6 channels) were collected, resulting in 4 conditions. In the second stage, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the test of attention in listening (TAIL) were applied. Stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of listening effort measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A significant difference was found between 6 and 16 channel stimuli in both pupil dilation change and EEG alpha band power change. In the hardest listening condition, whereas RAVLT scores are significant predictors of pupil dilation change, TAIL scores are significant predictors of EEG alpha power. As the stimulus difficulty decreased, the factors that predicted both EEG and pupillometry results decreased. In the single-task paradigm, a significant regression model could not be obtained at all four difficulty levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>As a result of the study, it was found that the pupil dilation change was more sensitive to auditory memory skills and the EEG alpha power change was more sensitive to auditory attention skills. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the sensitivity of different listening effort measurement methods to auditory cognitive skills.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9081,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70135","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study\",\"authors\":\"Samet Kılıç,&nbsp;Eser Sendesen,&nbsp;Filiz Aslan,&nbsp;Nurhan Erbil,&nbsp;Özgür Aydın,&nbsp;Didem Türkyılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/brb3.70135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is still not fully explained what kind of cognitive sources the methods used in the assessment of listening effort are more sensitive to and how these measurement results are related to each other. The aim of the study is to ascertain which neural resources crucial for listening effort are most sensitive to objective measurement methods using differently degraded speech stimuli.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 49 individuals between the ages of 19 and 34 with normal hearing participated in the study. In the first stage, simultaneous pupillometry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and single-task paradigm reaction time (RT) measurements were made during the challenging listening and repetition task with noise-vocoded speech. Two speech reception thresholds (SRT) (50% and 80%) for two vocoding conditions (16 and 6 channels) were collected, resulting in 4 conditions. In the second stage, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the test of attention in listening (TAIL) were applied. Stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of listening effort measurements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A significant difference was found between 6 and 16 channel stimuli in both pupil dilation change and EEG alpha band power change. In the hardest listening condition, whereas RAVLT scores are significant predictors of pupil dilation change, TAIL scores are significant predictors of EEG alpha power. As the stimulus difficulty decreased, the factors that predicted both EEG and pupillometry results decreased. In the single-task paradigm, a significant regression model could not be obtained at all four difficulty levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>As a result of the study, it was found that the pupil dilation change was more sensitive to auditory memory skills and the EEG alpha power change was more sensitive to auditory attention skills. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the sensitivity of different listening effort measurement methods to auditory cognitive skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brb3.70135\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brb3.70135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:听力评估方法对哪种认知源更为敏感,以及这些测量结果之间的关系如何,至今仍未得到充分说明。本研究旨在利用不同的降级语音刺激,确定哪些对听力至关重要的神经资源对客观测量方法最为敏感:共有 49 名听力正常、年龄介于 19 岁至 34 岁之间的人参加了研究。方法:共有 49 名听力正常、年龄在 19 到 34 岁之间的人参加了这项研究。第一阶段,在进行具有挑战性的听力和重复任务时,同时进行瞳孔测量、脑电图(EEG)和单任务范式反应时间(RT)测量,并使用噪声编码语音。收集了两种语音编码条件(16 和 6 个通道)下的两种语音接收阈值(SRT)(50% 和 80%),从而得出 4 种条件。第二阶段采用雷伊听觉言语学习测试(RAVLT)和听力注意力测试(TAIL)。对听力测量结果的预测因素进行了逐步线性回归分析:结果:在瞳孔放大变化和脑电图阿尔法波段功率变化方面,6 通道和 16 通道刺激之间存在明显差异。在最难听力条件下,RAVLT 分数是瞳孔放大变化的重要预测因素,而 TAIL 分数则是脑电图阿尔法功率的重要预测因素。随着刺激难度的降低,预测脑电图和瞳孔测量结果的因素也随之减少。在单一任务范式中,所有四个难度水平都无法获得显著的回归模型:研究结果表明,瞳孔放大变化对听觉记忆技能更为敏感,而脑电图α功率变化对听觉注意力技能更为敏感。据我们所知,这项研究是首次调查不同听力测量方法对听觉认知技能的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating Sensitivity to Auditory Cognition in Listening Effort Assessments: A Simultaneous EEG and Pupillometry Study

Background

It is still not fully explained what kind of cognitive sources the methods used in the assessment of listening effort are more sensitive to and how these measurement results are related to each other. The aim of the study is to ascertain which neural resources crucial for listening effort are most sensitive to objective measurement methods using differently degraded speech stimuli.

Methods

A total of 49 individuals between the ages of 19 and 34 with normal hearing participated in the study. In the first stage, simultaneous pupillometry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and single-task paradigm reaction time (RT) measurements were made during the challenging listening and repetition task with noise-vocoded speech. Two speech reception thresholds (SRT) (50% and 80%) for two vocoding conditions (16 and 6 channels) were collected, resulting in 4 conditions. In the second stage, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the test of attention in listening (TAIL) were applied. Stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictors of listening effort measurements.

Results

A significant difference was found between 6 and 16 channel stimuli in both pupil dilation change and EEG alpha band power change. In the hardest listening condition, whereas RAVLT scores are significant predictors of pupil dilation change, TAIL scores are significant predictors of EEG alpha power. As the stimulus difficulty decreased, the factors that predicted both EEG and pupillometry results decreased. In the single-task paradigm, a significant regression model could not be obtained at all four difficulty levels.

Conclusion

As a result of the study, it was found that the pupil dilation change was more sensitive to auditory memory skills and the EEG alpha power change was more sensitive to auditory attention skills. To our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the sensitivity of different listening effort measurement methods to auditory cognitive skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Behavior
Brain and Behavior BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain and Behavior is supported by other journals published by Wiley, including a number of society-owned journals. The journals listed below support Brain and Behavior and participate in the Manuscript Transfer Program by referring articles of suitable quality and offering authors the option to have their paper, with any peer review reports, automatically transferred to Brain and Behavior. * [Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica](https://publons.com/journal/1366/acta-psychiatrica-scandinavica) * [Addiction Biology](https://publons.com/journal/1523/addiction-biology) * [Aggressive Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/3611/aggressive-behavior) * [Brain Pathology](https://publons.com/journal/1787/brain-pathology) * [Child: Care, Health and Development](https://publons.com/journal/6111/child-care-health-and-development) * [Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health](https://publons.com/journal/3839/criminal-behaviour-and-mental-health) * [Depression and Anxiety](https://publons.com/journal/1528/depression-and-anxiety) * Developmental Neurobiology * [Developmental Science](https://publons.com/journal/1069/developmental-science) * [European Journal of Neuroscience](https://publons.com/journal/1441/european-journal-of-neuroscience) * [Genes, Brain and Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1635/genes-brain-and-behavior) * [GLIA](https://publons.com/journal/1287/glia) * [Hippocampus](https://publons.com/journal/1056/hippocampus) * [Human Brain Mapping](https://publons.com/journal/500/human-brain-mapping) * [Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour](https://publons.com/journal/7330/journal-for-the-theory-of-social-behaviour) * [Journal of Comparative Neurology](https://publons.com/journal/1306/journal-of-comparative-neurology) * [Journal of Neuroimaging](https://publons.com/journal/6379/journal-of-neuroimaging) * [Journal of Neuroscience Research](https://publons.com/journal/2778/journal-of-neuroscience-research) * [Journal of Organizational Behavior](https://publons.com/journal/1123/journal-of-organizational-behavior) * [Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System](https://publons.com/journal/3929/journal-of-the-peripheral-nervous-system) * [Muscle & Nerve](https://publons.com/journal/4448/muscle-and-nerve) * [Neural Pathology and Applied Neurobiology](https://publons.com/journal/2401/neuropathology-and-applied-neurobiology)
期刊最新文献
Association Between Dietary Fiber Intake and Sleep Disorders: Based on the NHANES Database Cannabidiol Treatment for Adult Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsies: A Real-World Study in a Tertiary Center Levels and Predictors of Suicide Literacy and Suicide Stigma in Spanish-Speaking Individuals The Basis of Cognitive and Behavioral Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Featured Cover
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1