基于深度学习和数字病理图像构建胰腺导管腺癌综合预后模型。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMC Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1186/s12876-024-03469-4
Kaixin Hu, Chenyang Bian, Jiayin Yu, Dawei Jiang, Zhangjun Chen, Fengqing Zhao, Huangbao Li
{"title":"基于深度学习和数字病理图像构建胰腺导管腺癌综合预后模型。","authors":"Kaixin Hu, Chenyang Bian, Jiayin Yu, Dawei Jiang, Zhangjun Chen, Fengqing Zhao, Huangbao Li","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03469-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning has made significant advancements in the field of digital pathology, and the integration of multiple models has further improved accuracy. In this study, we aimed to construct a combined prognostic model using deep learning-extracted features from digital pathology images of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) alongside clinical predictive indicators and to explore its prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 postoperative pathologically confirmed PDAC cases. These cases were divided into training (n = 114) and testing sets (n = 28) at an 8:2 ratio. Tumor whole-slide imaging features were extracted and screened to construct a pathological risk model based on a pre-trained deep learning model. Clinical and pathological data from the training set were used to select independent predictive factors for PDAC and establish a clinical risk model using LASSO, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Based on the pathological and clinical risk models, a combined model was developed. The Harrell concordance index (C-index) was computed to assess the predictive performance of each model for PDAC survival prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the training and testing sets, the C-index values for the clinical risk model were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively; for the pathological risk model, they were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively; and for the combined model, they were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. The combined model exhibited appropriate calibration at 1-, 3-, and 5-year time points, as well as a superior area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve and clinical net benefit compared to the single models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating the pathological and clinical risk models may provide a higher predictive value for survival prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"24 1","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction of a combined prognostic model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on deep learning and digital pathology images.\",\"authors\":\"Kaixin Hu, Chenyang Bian, Jiayin Yu, Dawei Jiang, Zhangjun Chen, Fengqing Zhao, Huangbao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-024-03469-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning has made significant advancements in the field of digital pathology, and the integration of multiple models has further improved accuracy. In this study, we aimed to construct a combined prognostic model using deep learning-extracted features from digital pathology images of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) alongside clinical predictive indicators and to explore its prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 postoperative pathologically confirmed PDAC cases. These cases were divided into training (n = 114) and testing sets (n = 28) at an 8:2 ratio. Tumor whole-slide imaging features were extracted and screened to construct a pathological risk model based on a pre-trained deep learning model. Clinical and pathological data from the training set were used to select independent predictive factors for PDAC and establish a clinical risk model using LASSO, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Based on the pathological and clinical risk models, a combined model was developed. The Harrell concordance index (C-index) was computed to assess the predictive performance of each model for PDAC survival prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the training and testing sets, the C-index values for the clinical risk model were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively; for the pathological risk model, they were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively; and for the combined model, they were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. The combined model exhibited appropriate calibration at 1-, 3-, and 5-year time points, as well as a superior area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve and clinical net benefit compared to the single models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating the pathological and clinical risk models may provide a higher predictive value for survival prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03469-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03469-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:深度学习在数字病理学领域取得了重大进展,多种模型的整合进一步提高了准确性。在本研究中,我们旨在利用深度学习从胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)数字病理图像中提取的特征,结合临床预测指标构建一个综合预后模型,并探讨其预后价值:对142例术后病理确诊的PDAC病例进行了回顾性分析。这些病例按 8:2 的比例分为训练集(n = 114)和测试集(n = 28)。根据预先训练好的深度学习模型,提取并筛选肿瘤全切片成像特征,构建病理风险模型。利用训练集中的临床和病理数据选择 PDAC 的独立预测因素,并使用 LASSO、单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析建立临床风险模型。在病理和临床风险模型的基础上,建立了一个综合模型。计算了哈雷尔一致性指数(C-index),以评估每个模型对PDAC生存预后的预测性能:结果:在训练集和测试集中,临床风险模型的 C-index 值分别为 0.76 和 0.75;病理风险模型的 C-index 值分别为 0.82 和 0.73;综合模型的 C-index 值分别为 0.86 和 0.77。与单一模型相比,综合模型在1年、3年和5年时间点均表现出适当的校准,接收者操作特征曲线下面积和临床净获益也更优:结论:整合病理和临床风险模型可为生存预后提供更高的预测价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construction of a combined prognostic model for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on deep learning and digital pathology images.

Background: Deep learning has made significant advancements in the field of digital pathology, and the integration of multiple models has further improved accuracy. In this study, we aimed to construct a combined prognostic model using deep learning-extracted features from digital pathology images of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) alongside clinical predictive indicators and to explore its prognostic value.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 142 postoperative pathologically confirmed PDAC cases. These cases were divided into training (n = 114) and testing sets (n = 28) at an 8:2 ratio. Tumor whole-slide imaging features were extracted and screened to construct a pathological risk model based on a pre-trained deep learning model. Clinical and pathological data from the training set were used to select independent predictive factors for PDAC and establish a clinical risk model using LASSO, univariate, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Based on the pathological and clinical risk models, a combined model was developed. The Harrell concordance index (C-index) was computed to assess the predictive performance of each model for PDAC survival prognosis.

Results: For the training and testing sets, the C-index values for the clinical risk model were 0.76 and 0.75, respectively; for the pathological risk model, they were 0.82 and 0.73, respectively; and for the combined model, they were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. The combined model exhibited appropriate calibration at 1-, 3-, and 5-year time points, as well as a superior area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve and clinical net benefit compared to the single models.

Conclusions: Integrating the pathological and clinical risk models may provide a higher predictive value for survival prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
The diagnositic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of tissue oxygen status in rat hepatoma model. Impact of Ahmadi Continuing Nursing Model on self-care ability, stoma complications and quality of life of colostomy patients. Rhaponticin suppresses the stemness phenotype of gastric cancer stem-like cells CD133+/CD166 + by inhibiting programmed death-ligand 1. The association between non- and pro-healthy diet indices and the risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study. The effect of propranolol on gastrointestinal motility and permeability in patients with cirrhosis and significant portal hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1